So how does this work, exactly? Jesus is paying the price for our sins.. A price set and collected by his own father? God makes the rules here, right?

So god decided that because people did not do what he wanted then they should go to hell forever. But wait! God has a plan.. Send Jesus to earth for a bit, let him die then bring him back up to heaven. Debts settled!

Though, I'm still going to hell anyway, so I kinda don't see the point in that plan..

Someone explain.
>> ^shinyblurry:
Jesus was not a scapegoat. He laid down His life, willingly, to take the punishment that you and I deserve. He paid the price for our sins, paid it in His blood; He was bruised for our inequities, and pierced for our transgressions. He died so that you and I could be forgiven for our sins and to give to us eternal life. He did what He did out love, love for us, that even while we drove in the nails, He loved us.

Reminds me a little of Powerthirst.

Very nice sift. He's a pretty inspiring guy.

The video was beautifully shot, except.. wtf is with crossing the line during the interview? Switching from the left side to right side, in simple terms. Don't do that. Seriously.. don't.

Maybe you could keep this in mind next time you're moralising?>> ^shinyblurry:
However, that is their choice, and it is not up to me, but it is between them and God.

The gentlemen doth protest too much, methinks.

America, solve your problems through obesity!

What's with the crooked frame and lack of transitions between clips?

WTF does this have to do with Skyrim??

At the first chord I was like, no.. way..

I never thought I'd hear the Small Faces in a GTA clip.>> ^paganif1:

Upvote for the Ogden's Nut Gone Flake.

That's my job right there, though for a different country's AF. Never seen our aerobatic team get that close! I'd be shitting myself.

I love my job. (edit: except for all the vomiting, that's something I could do without)

I think you have to "relax" your eyes.. or go cross-eyed. Or try looking "through" the video.>> ^GeeSussFreeK:

That's really odd, this one didn't work for me at all. I think it has to do with the shading on the top...or I am going flat out bonkers.

(Hopefully not derailing the thread..)

Use light at a known wavelength, let's say 475nm (blue), then record your response and my response. If we both say "blue" then it would indicate we're both seeing the same blue.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

>> ^GeeSussFreeK:

I can't even prove that the color blue I am seeing is the same for you as it is me, proof is hard

"Are you sure that's safe, boss?"
"Yes, very safe, I swear.. You'll be fine."

With the amount of people and equipment around I could easily imagine there's a foreman in charge.

Here's the problem, guys.

There is no way of debating evolution with this underlying belief.

Stop wasting our time.



Quick edit: Dude! Please don't give us "literally hundreds of examples".. just summarise. Pleeeassee?>> ^shinyblurry:

No, I believe the bible is the inspired word of God and that He created the world in 6 days. I also believe that science supports that account of creation and disputes the theory of evolution. I could give you literally hundreds of examples as to why this is the case.

I'd have trouble taking anything you've copied from a religious website seriously. It's hardly unbiased, is it?

http://www.allaboutthejourney.org/problems-with-the-fossil-record.htm
>> ^shinyblurry:

This video is complete fantasy. Take the evolutionary animation for instance..none of that is supported in the fossil record. All of those transitions are completely inference, especially ape to man. If you believe that, you are thick..do your own investigation. There isn't any conclusive evidence for ape to man evolution what so ever.
And you don't think they're looking for true transitionals? Why do you think evolutionists trotted out piltdown man and nebraska man as proof of evolution for over 50 years, and why today the desperate search is still on to find the missing link. They thought it was neanderthal man but it turned out to be a guy with arthritus and rickets. The fossil record isn't just incomplete, it is ludicrously so..with hundreds of millions of them uncovered yet no true transitionals. I'll let real palentologists explain it to you:
Our museums now contain hundreds of millions of fossil specimens (40 million alone are contained in the Smithsonian Natural History Museum). If Darwin's theory were true, we should see at least tens of millions of unquestionable transitional forms. We see none. Even the late Stephen Jay Gould, Professor of Geology and Paleontology at Harvard University and the leading spokesman for evolutionary theory prior to his recent death, confessed "the extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology."
He continues:
The history of most fossil species includes two features inconsistent with gradualism: 1. Statis. Most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they disappear… 2. Sudden Appearance. In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and 'fully formed'. 6 The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils. 7... etc, etc..