Part two: http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-july-14-2011/exclusive---leroy-petry-extended-interview-pt--2

Who said anything about need? >> ^CelebrateApathy:

>> ^MarineGunrock:
...15 hollow point rounds to the chest would make sure of that.
If you need more than one or two you're doin' it wrong.

FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP

>> ^Payback:

If the US pulls out like Paul wants, you'd put a lot of honest, hard-working American billionaires out of a job.


Honest, hard-working, LOL



I think you forgot to check the "sarcasm" box.

This whole "they hate us because of our freedom!" thing is fucking retarded. If they attacked us because of that, why hasn't Germany, Canada, Switzerland, Poland, Iceland, Greenland et. al. been attacked like we have? Oh, it's because they're not sticking their collective noses in other nation's business? ...... okay.

>> ^qualm:

^Hehe. He's the sort of guy who never uses a big word when a diminutive one will do.


I see what you did there.

I was hoping it would.>> ^stellar:

There are so many ways that could have gone terribly wrong.

Well, being that China already hols 36% of our debt, or $5,040,000,000,000, I think it's safe to say we're on our way there.>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^hpqp:
In 100 years a scientologist will be one of the serious contenders for the Republican presidential nominations.
It'll never happen. The elections will stop once we become a Chinese territory.

*promote

So after watching, I thought this was stupid, that it was only something that people with money to waste would buy - but I had completely forgotten this technology's appeal to the handicapped. People with missing or functionally impaired arms, hands or fingers could use this to have a nice tight shoe simply and independently. As of right now, I have no idea what kind of footwear I'd use if I could no longer tie laces. Flipflops aren't exactly safe nor are they socially acceptable everywhere. *promote

TRIPOD. FUCKING GET ONE.

We have Na2S2O3 at work, but what the hell did he use for the catalyst? I MUST KNOW.

I'm not saying I would have saved the day. I'm saying I would have fucking tried.

I'm not sure what bias there would be. I seriously doubt that's the kind of thing you could easily study, so I'm not going to bother looking for data. But we all know that people on drugs, meth in particular, are/can be very paranoid and twitchy. It doesn't take but a bell to ring at the door for them to be spooked enough to pull the trigger while it's aiming at the clerk. Besides, I think that if they had access to AK-47s they'd use them the first time. It's why I go to the range as much as I can to keep my aim as good as possible. If I get the chance to draw a bead on someone who is actively and willingly endangering someone's life, they probably won't live to regret it. 15 hollow point rounds to the chest would make sure of that.>> ^Yogi:

>> ^MarineGunrock:
Anti-escalation policies can get people killed. Some robbers will just as easily shoot someone complying with their demands ans someone who tried to resist. I'd take the shot in a heartbeat.

Try this logic. Walgreens guy defends Walgreens with a hand gun...at the next Walgreens robbery a few towns over after this has made national news the robbers come in hyper aggressive with AK-47s. They don't fuck around they just shoot if they think anyone can possibly be reaching for a gun.
I remember when I used to work at Gamestop I helped out at another one...and they told me someone was just fired for leaving too many envelopes of the days earnings in the safe. I thought "That's stupid whats the big F'n deal?" They explained to me that if a robbery had happened and the thieves got away with a large haul...it could potentially put more people in danger because it would get the message out that there's a large haul to be had from Gamestop...people could die over something like that.
Also your "some robbers will just as easily shoot someone complying with their demands..." comment. Is it based on fact or a study?

I know. Fuckin' box cutters. I allllmost want to say we deserved it for having a nation full of such pussies that they wouldn't stand up to some fuckin' morons with box cutters. I mean, they were going to die either way. Should have at least fucking TRIED. >> ^waynef100:

Anti-escalation policies allowed 9/11 to happen. They had box cutters right?>> ^MarineGunrock:
Anti-escalation policies can get people killed. Some robbers will just as easily shoot someone complying with their demands ans someone who tried to resist. I'd take the shot in a heartbeat.