How can anyone forget that sultry saxaphone? This takes me back.

She sounds like she was bitten by a venomous slow-snake. Can we have a category for bio-chemical trainwrecks already?

joedirt: Shop Smart, Shop S-Mart!

Newsom writes and performs such a pretty music.

Are you seriously suggesting that because none of us have the ability to remotely pilot a USAF that we cannot recognize the colossal mistake recorded in this video?

As a general aside, I personally think classifying any video which graphically depicts a human death as snuff is not a suitable rule of thumb. Though I admit that my personal standards for feeling offended are perhaps more relaxed than the average persons, I think 'snuff' is more urban legend than deviant pornography tearing our moral fabric apart at the seems.

So without considering the tact with which a video was made, what technically constitutes snuff or otherwise prohibited submissions due to violent content? Does http://www.videosift.com/story.php?id=7331 pass your criteria and, if so, is there some value to the content beyond the simple fact that it captures the moment of death?

P.S. Welcome to videosift, Anliz!

I often wonder how many videosift users are actually marketing interns who lurk about our ranks, sifting only to satisify their evil corporate overlords. Hmm...

[redacted]

It's a nikon d70. The d200 is the latest hotness though.

Overcoming adversity, such as spelling words properly.

Hey, "mormon" is just Jamaican for "more men"

As my 'alternative-reality-portal' is currently in the shop, perhaps you could tell me what it means if drugs were legalized.

Also, I'm not sure where you got your information but LSD is arguably the safest illicit drug. While most drugs are measured in grams or milligrams, the average dosage of LSD is measured in micrograms and the LSD molecule is the smallest of known psychoactive chemicals. This is why LSD can be distributed on blotter paper and why I would argue the relative safety point. Even if the paper is infused with some other, more dangerous drug, it could occur in amounts no larger than a couple hundred micrograms -- far below the amount required to trigger even a threshold effect.

On the other hand, a typical LSD dose is 50 - 150 ug and the LD50 of LSD (the amount at which 50% of test animals died as a result of ingestion) is 12,000 ug (reference: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/lsd/lsd_dose.shtml) Inferring from that one can assume that taking 80 to 240 average units of acid will lead to a 50% chance of death. While there are not yet any documented cases of LSD poisoning, an overdose is within the realm of possibility provided sufficient brazen ignorance or sheer stupidity -- of which both circumstances, I should add, have an LD50 much higher than that of LSD.

Not that I want to be too much of a jerk, but I was just wondering if it were possible for quantumushroom to pose an argument without sounding stupid?

A better planet than you or I will ever know

same here... "meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow"