@RhesusMonk

...you really look way too much into things. It's comedy. That's it.

People that think Windows is bad software make me laugh. They obviously have 0 idea what software is typically like. Windows is probably better than 90% of software out there today, and if you don't think so, then you clearly don't know what software is out there today. Most companies that produce software would kill to be able to make something like Windows.

That said, yes, I'm still on XP. I'm sure Vista is good but the problem is XP is good too and there is no reason for me to switch.

For all the supposed support that Ron Paul has, you'd think he'd have more delegates from the primaries so far. But I suppose someone is going to say there's still a lot of states left and he's going to come back, right?

I can't wait until he finally racks up enough 5th and 6th place finishes to quit so these videos don't litter the top 15 anymore.

Cars have pilots now?

I would *wtf this if I could

I see the Ron Paul 5% still runs strong on VideoSift.

Sorry, I can't respect a guy that misuses the term fascism like half the people on the Internet do. What the hell is "Soft Fascism". It's either fascism or not. Mussolini was fascist. What, is Bill Gates a fascist too? Are you really going to take fascism so lightly?

God, I'm glad this guy is never going to be President. And I'm glad you people that support him are the minority and/or foreign and can't vote in our election and/or under voting age.

Good.

Normally I hate when the change movies from the book... But I felt the end of Return of the King was a letdown. After the kickass final battle of The Two Towers, I was expecting (as someone who hadn't read the books) something epic at the end of the third movie. Didn't really care for what I did get.

Don't get me wrong, overall it's a beautiful story, but it wasn't the epic end I was expecting to a 9 hour (more if you watch the special editions) movie. I never read the book in the first place, so I wouldn't have been disappointed if there was a final battle with Sauron. I was kinda disappointed not to get it.

Oh, and for the record, I'm not religious and I do believe in evolution. I mention it because some reject is 100% likely (it's the internet, it just happens) to assume I am one or the other or both just because I'm taking Huckabee's side on this one.

@budzos...

Sorry, but it's foolish to say that such a complex issue is settled by a simple yes or no. As likely as it is, evolution is a theory, also, define "creationism". Do you mean actual the earth is 6000 years old creationism or are you down on the guy just because he says a greater power was involved? Because I do recall his answer to both the evolution question AND the 6000 years question, when allowed to give an answer other than yes or no, was "I don't know".

In something like this, I don't know is a perfectly valid answer. As a matter of fact anyone that claims to know is a fool. All of this is theory and while some theory is more likely than others, unless you are a Scientist actually researching this stuff your "knowing" is no better than reciting verbatim what your supposed elementary/jr. high teachers told you.

Personally, I think it's refreshing to find someone who is wise enough to admit he doesn't know things. In such an issue that is truly impossible for us to KNOW at this point (I did not say speculate, I did not say theorize, and I'm not even trying to imply that we're not really close to correct) I have respect for someone who is willing to say "I don't know" and leave the argument to the people that SHOULD be debating it.

Hope that quickness to judge people works out in life for you. I'm sure you'll have loads of friends.

He wasn't saying that questions about his faith aren't fair. He was saying that boiling it down to a simple "raise your hand if you believe this" and moving on was not appropriate. You'll understand that perfectly if you ever talk with a government employee on the phone, and they repeatedly ask you to respond yes or no to questions that require explanation, and yet are denied it.

He wasn't saying he shouldn't be asked about Evolution, but that at that particular debate if they were going to ask, they should have allowed him to express his answer more fully instead of just leaving it at that.

Anyway, I'm just defending this guy because even though I'm a Democrat, this is one Republican who I actually think isn't insane, is a genuinely nice guy, and has some good ideas.

Plus he has the support of Chuck Norris! How can you go wrong?

He didn't say he didn't believe in Evolution, he said that he didn't know, but that there was a creator behind it. He also said that it's inappropriate to ask such questions as "yes or no" questions without explanation in a presidential debate, which it is. But I guess some of you are too busy giving yourselves handjobs over how great it is to be able to have another Christian to bash that you've got no problem twisting it into whatever you want.

@Memorare
Wow, you conspiracy people never turn off, do you?

Wow, a crappy picture montage. I'm... so touched?