Baby Jesus would be ashamed of you Mike .

OOOOWWWWWAAAAAHHHH!!!!

^Wow! Choggie actually posted in one of these topics?

On behalf of the sift community, I would like to officially welcome you to the never-ending circlejerk.

Wow, fantastic sifting Netrunner. As November gets closer, these sifts are going to be even more significant. Keep 'em coming!

I was thinking along the same lines as you ashes, but not going as far. I thought perhaps a *dupe invocation might work a little like a dead call. Whereby the submitter is notified by email that someone has claimed their submission is a dupe. As long as a link is supplied to the original, the member can either agree and discard their video or dispute it and have it *discussed.
And like the dead call, if they don't respond to the *dupe call within a few days, their video is auto-discarded.

*downunder

^Doesn't look like siftbot wants to join in on the fun.

Well KP's new avatar was certainly prophetic.

*gay

I was expecting him to climb on his chair and throw faeces.

No way is Bill that good an actor.

^It's English title is 'Downfall' and yes, it's an excellent piece of cinema.

I've been thinking about this quite a bit since I made this post, and every time I think I might have a rough idea of how to deal with it, I immediately think of an example that breaks it.

If a case were to come up and a few members were to see it and think it was ok, it only takes one member to disagree and discard. So who's opinion overrules who's?

perhaps it should be up to an agreement between the original submitter and the new submitter. But that certainly isn't a solid solution either.

I'm not bothered that so much that my video was discarded, but more by the fact that these cases come up every so often and there never seems to be any consistency to how they are dealt with.

*kill

*beg