Tags for this video have been changed from 'Asshole, Life' to 'Asshole, Life, Coleman Sweeney, Organ Donor' - edited by blackfox42

>> ^alien_concept:

>> ^Trancecoach:
I dunno.. he seemed to demonstrate a bit of talent in Sweeney Todd and Hugo.
>> ^Payback:
Cohen is such a talentless whore.


And Ali G and Borat. You can't prank that many people and have someone accuse you of being talentless, whether you appreciate his work or not.


And of course, don't forget hit standout performance in Talladega Nights.

>> ^Trancecoach:

I dunno.. he seemed to demonstrate a bit of talent in Sweeney Todd and Hugo.
>> ^Payback:
Cohen is such a talentless whore.



And Ali G and Borat. You can't prank that many people and have someone accuse you of being talentless, whether you appreciate his work or not.

I dunno.. he seemed to demonstrate a bit of talent in Sweeney Todd and Hugo.

>> ^Payback:

Cohen is such a talentless whore.

haha that's awesome

always been a fan of Jackson's comedy, saw her live once.

liked sweeney, but in her older age she's become a bit fanatical zealot herself

Good stuff.

I don't really even have to make stuff up. There is so much perverted goodness in Christian mythology. Lot and his daughters, David and Bathsheba and Onan would all make great porn stories. Although, in general, God seems to prefer snuff to erotica. >> ^shinyblurry:

So this bizarre interpertation wasn't really a vehicle to share religious porn titles you've sat around and dreamt up in your spare time? Okay, turn about is fair play..
Richard Dawkings, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris in The Big Bang
The Flying Spaghetti Monster in Oodles of Noodles
Julia Sweeney and Eddie Izzard in ewwwwww
>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
This has much in common with 80's porn - The soft focus lens (smeared with holy Vaseline?), the cheesy music, the improbable story line and the terrible acting punctuating the longer hardcore theological gyrations. I think this would be more effective with Marylin Chambers and John Holmes. "Repent, heathen! On your knees and prepare to receive your new Lord and savior." You could even do a sequel and call it "The Second Cumming." How about a trilogy? "Spare the Rod, Spoil the Twins!"
I don't know. This is just off the top of my head, but I think there is some potential here.

So this bizarre interpertation wasn't really a vehicle to share religious porn titles you've sat around and dreamt up in your spare time? Okay, turn about is fair play..

Richard Dawkings, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris in The Big Bang
The Flying Spaghetti Monster in Oodles of Noodles
Julia Sweeney and Eddie Izzard in ewwwwww

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
This has much in common with 80's porn - The soft focus lens (smeared with holy Vaseline?), the cheesy music, the improbable story line and the terrible acting punctuating the longer hardcore theological gyrations. I think this would be more effective with Marylin Chambers and John Holmes. "Repent, heathen! On your knees and prepare to receive your new Lord and savior." You could even do a sequel and call it "The Second Cumming." How about a trilogy? "Spare the Rod, Spoil the Twins!"
I don't know. This is just off the top of my head, but I think there is some potential here.

Thanks for the quality

In reply to this comment by Fusionaut:
*quality *cute *kids

>> ^campionidelmondo:

>> ^bareboards2:
And someone had to work really hard to find the dupe.


How so? There are only 5 Julia Sweeney videos on this site.
Anyways, that mormon video is clearly a dupe of the longer one.


I disagree. We let a lot of videos stay that are shorter cuts of longer videos on here. It's subjective, I suppose, whether or not portions of longer vids are seen as dupes, but the agreement tends to be that if it's not an identical dupe then it's not a dupe.

If you posted an awesome ten second football goal but I posted the entire two hour game a few minutes before, would you think it's fair for me to dupe yours?

See, @blankfist, it isn't nearly as settled as you think it is that a clear excerpt of a longer vid is a dupe or not.

Certainly the person who duped my excerpt thinks it is a dupe. Campion thinks it is a dupe. You don't. Gwiz doesn't. Bone doesn't. And I don't.

Who knows how everyone else feels about it.

Now what do we do? There is a clear and profound difference of opinion on this.


>> ^campionidelmondo:

>> ^bareboards2:
And someone had to work really hard to find the dupe.


How so? There are only 5 Julia Sweeney videos on this site.
Anyways, that mormon video is clearly a dupe of the longer one.

>> ^bareboards2:

And someone had to work really hard to find the dupe.



How so? There are only 5 Julia Sweeney videos on this site.

Anyways, that mormon video is clearly a dupe of the longer one.

@blankfist

http://videosift.com/video/Julia-Sweeney-meets-Two-Mormon-Missionaries?noredirect

A six minute excerpt from a 18 minute original. The excerpt starts at the 8 minute mark.

You can see my astonishment that this was considered a dupe. And someone had to work really hard to find the dupe. There was serious effort put into duping this.

I did use *isdupe...that was entry #4, what did I do wrong?
Edit: oh wait...I used dupe OF...got it.

In reply to this comment by therealblankman:
>> ^AdrianBlack:

...but I thought I just second-ed overcasts' dupe nomination?


You need to use *isdupe

7 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.

This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by therealblankman.