westy

Member Profile


Member Since: July 25, 2006
Last Power Points used: never
Available: now
Power Points at Recharge: 1   Get More Power Points Now!

Comments to westy

haki says...

In reply to this comment by westy:
I guess if you cannot see the funny side then you probably just fail in gneral.


Regardless of u stance on animal crulty its ironic that the people r trying to get the dogs to fight and the dogs just want to sniff eachothers bums and hump.

if annything it gose in the face of dog fighting.

allso this video in no way indorses dog fighting.


seems like some of you guys are the typs of people that cannot find humor in things Because it is within a context you disagree with or find offencive.

Ultimetly thats your loss.

I personaly think we should laff at and enjoy eveything we can evan if its something negative and then make sure to try and improve things. for example you can still hate and fight against blood sports and find this amusing.

Being able to find humor in negative ( or percivably) nagitive situatoins is a incredably vauable skill. there have been manny instances where people have been in desperate situatoins and the only resoin the didnt give up was becuse of a sence of humor.

Infact Our mear exsistence is pritty dam hilarouse in a hopeless and ironic way.


we could learn to laugh at it or we could learn how to spell

JiggaJonson says...

I'm not clueless to the use and function of profanity. Profanity serves a real purpose in our language (for instance I can't think of any other way to say "Fuck you" with the same effect). But I think you're the one who is misinterpreting the word usage not the other way around.

Profanity exists to give offense. In that context, who were you trying to offend?

Perhaps I misconstrued your sharp criticism as a tirade because you peppered it with profanity. In THAT context were the words 'performing their function' as you say?

In reply to this comment by westy:
>> ^JiggaJonson:
I hate it almost as much as idiotic tirades that rely on profanity to express a point. Get some real language like 'abhorrent' or 'vile' if you want to be nasty without being so crude.
^westy:
what an idiotic comparison , and fucking terrible editing.



Clearly not idoitic (or not necessarily idiotic) I belive the statment you have made is far more idoitic in its content than my "tirade" as you put it.

"get some real language" what a stupid thing to say. Its clear what I wrote to the point that you understood it and I'm sure others would , Although It might be more interesting for some people to use different words at times who Cares if the words used work and perform there function.

(also your suggested words would add no real benefit to what i said other than satisfying your subjective preferences to words used)

I don't see why "rude" words are necessarily crude or how any words are any more or less real language than any other words.

what should really annoy you are people that are clueless to the function of language and are obsessed with details that although can be beneficial and helpful to communication and some times make language more interesting and poetic are merely the icing on the cake and not the cake itself.

GenjiKilpatrick says...

In reply to this comment by westy:
if it was just the wogs then I could see how a dipshit oversensitive prick could be offended , but because Michal Jackson is white it makes 100% seance and anyone that's offended should be thrown into a pit of cow testicles and urinated on.



Westy. You obviously have no idea what the connotations of black face are, Racism and group superior.

If you have no problem with black face then you have no empathy for the millions of black americans it was use to offend belittle and degrade. It depicts blacks as unintelligent uneducated dancing singing jesters for your amusement.

" See, this what those silly blacks act like all the time when we aren't around. "

Black face was, and still is, an attack on black culture. No matter if you're aware of the offense or not.

It's racist and a flagrantly inaccurate stereotype encompassing people like Harriet Tubman and Frederick Douglass who were by no means unintelligent or less valuable than any of us today.


In conclusion, I submit your comment here is insensitive, ignorant and prickish.
I'm sad to see the videosift community has to endure statements of that nature. = /

gwiz665 says...

Hey westy,
I have no hard feelings against you or anything. I think your comment was over-the-top and I think it was an over-the-top reaction that you got hobbled for it too (hypocrisy abound). I think the best thing to do is put it past you and continue as before.

Just learn and grow from it. Make racist jokes again too, but be careful about them.

Cheers.

enoch says...

In reply to this comment by westy:
lol so stupid how they jump to the conclusoin that tripping out is some how the person going to another place in actuality, rather than actually invistigating the more likely aspect that the drug simply makes people counchously aware of parts of the brain that are normally separated from the counchoise.


is your voting finger broke? come on..that was a great documentary!

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Member's Highest Rated Videos