Your video, "why I'm striking", has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Happy anniversary! Today marks year number 3 since you first became a Sifter and the community is better for having you. Thanks for your contributions!

This is why we can't have nice things. Stop blaming Nader when the Democrats simply didn't get the job done. Dems have a fine record of losing all on their own. No need to blame Nader.

This is why I'm independent. Our choices are a bunch of assholes..or a bunch of pussies. Both are in bed with corps. Dems can be just as deluded as Reps

In reply to this comment by highdileeho:
we already had an uncorruptable progressive canidate in nader and he was why bush won the 2nd term; that turned out exceptionally. our memories seem to be just as short as the repubs.

EDIT: oops..hit the wrong button..feel free to delete

Your video, Bill Moyers and Jeff Toobin discuss supreme court corruption, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

In reply to this comment by highdileeho:
Whatever you cracker ass faggot



In reply to this comment by Heartspark:
This is why people don't say crap when riding public transportation. You don't know the person, or anything about them. Hell they could be on the bus with a handgun ready to take out every coworker they are with and was going to leave you alone till you said "hello".


Racist, mental problems, or not..EBM WAS in the right here. He did defend himself.
Black or white does not matter, you do not act on impulses to do whatever violent act you see fit based on someones words towards you.

If that was the case, half you mother fuckers would be dead on here.


Wow, I had respect for you. Now I don't.

In reply to this comment by highdileeho:
Thanks for that great definition, I would be lost in this world if people like you don't take up the role of degrading peoples intellect. That spelling correction: thank you. I assume you sent out replies to everyone who had an opinion on this video? oh right, you were being a loudmouthed arrogant douchebag.

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
>> ^highdileeho:
I'm pretty sure that mother fucker asked the black guy to spit shine his 'stacy adams'. that's why the whole thing started, and why the woman replied with racial slurs, It was in response to the motherfuckers racism. I'm pretty sure the black guy was just reacting to the white guys racism as well. The motherfucker started it, the motherfucker initiated the bullying, and the black guy was vilified for being in the wrong. Funny how everyone assumed that the black guy must have deserved it. You refer to an asian as a 'chinaman' on the street and see if you get the motherfucker treatment, I bet you will. I just hope the asian won't vilified.
I changed the spelling of the word Vilified to be correct in your quote, so now it is a paraphrase.

We don't know what happened before the video, so there is no way to know for sure who started what. Or how the conversation began to take place. The evidence in the video is circumstantial. This means we have to infer what happened before, and that is highly uncertain. Circumstantial evidence alone is not enough to have a case, there must be corroborating evidence. There simply exists, for us, no way to know what took place before the beginning of this video.

No I was simply replying to your comment, and I took the time to proof it.

Your assumption is wrong. I only replied to those that I thought were interesting enough to comment.

Furthermore you can look at my comment history and find loads of spelling errors, grammar failures and overall stupidity. I take the time to proof read my comments now, because once they are on the internet they are there forever. Or until the internet implodes. Even if that means proofreading the quotes that I use.

Your video, Hero talks about Bernanke's reappointment, and his failures, has made it into the Top 20 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Fuck you. Stay off my board.

In reply to this comment by highdileeho:
In reply to this comment by rougy:
woman on the street

her shoes themselves
would light my room
like my candles.

she walks like all things
shining on glass,
like all things
that make a difference.

she walks away

(Charles Bukowski)
Don't be such a sensitive prick, I wasn't insulting you or him. I read his stuff, I like the one about how people suck and how softness, whinning, and mediocracy prevails. Sitting here and listen to you croon words from a dead man, make him the truth.

It's definitely based on Penny's farm. However, that song is a pretty basic depression era song. Dylan's lyrics are more of a declaration of independence from his former musical ideals and the people who saw this as "pure" music. So it's pretty cool that he performed that song the first time he ever played electric on a stage, and at the Newport Folk festival no less.

In reply to this comment by highdileeho:
try to find "the bently boys": down on penny's farm. Great original, from wich Dylan kinda "borrowed" re-arranged and formed maggies farm. The only reason I believe dylan stole the song is because the lyrics imply the same metaphor and values. The original is a little better. Not trying to troll, just saying, check out the original. Its an amazing song....I found a link to the song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_9_kp8HPfA

In reply to this comment by highdileeho:
I got to say, Astrophysicists are the creationist of the scientific community. Almost every single modern theory regarding this subject is completly untestable. And in every other scientific discipline you cannot even create a hypothesis unless it is 'testable' let alone assert it as being a theory. Try publishing an ecological journal without signifigant testable data to back you up; It would be your last. You certainly wouldn't be visited by nerds, sipping wine at a vineyard talking about your insane ramblings. A theory based on what? the fact that another scientist cannot test it to be false simply because it is physiclly impossible? That logic is exactly aligned with religions 'faith' based principles that we all love to bash so freely. I think We can only say that certain sub-atomic and atomic particles react a peticular way. But making wild assertins as to how, why, and how we can manipulate those wild assertions is where we all went astray. I blame Einsteen, He duped the entire world, and became an icon to astrophysicists. So now they all follow his very arrogant and presumptious methodology. Being right 2 or 3 times when you were wrong hundreds is a terrible ratio for any scientist...well except for...you know fake scientists like these guys. ohhh snap, ecologists talking trash...what Son! We run this bitch!
And Relying soley on Mathamatics it very very faulty. Even newton who was thinking way beyond the scale of any measurable device was innovative enough to create devices to test his hypothosis'ss's. The bottom line is, it's not a theory unless you can repeatedly test a hypothosis as being true, beyond crunching numbers. Face it, you can bend any number into another to bolster a pre-existing concept. So I don't want to hear any rebuttle about how this is different because the scale is so much more vast than 'typical' science.

Hahaha... very similar... and we finished ours, too, and it was fantastic. I still have the scar and a little lump on my index finger.

A guy named Jim would be one of five people who know this story, if that counts!

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

I don't think any less of you at all. No one can fully control what they witness or experience. It wasn't a situation where you could speak up or change anything. Thank you for sharing what you did.

In reply to this comment by highdileeho

don't forget to vote for your own videos yo!

Not a problem... he is definitely one of the all time greats!

In reply to this comment by highdileeho:
Thanks for putting me on to this guy, Brilliant. i went on youtube. There was a long documentary about 90 minutes. It was the history of his joke telling, with a smattering of an autobiography mixed in. He is a brilliant comic, definitly one of the best, top 3. He had me rolling with laughter for 90 minutes. the 1 when he talks about taking a shit when he worked in the shipyard and beating out his flaming pubic hair with a hammer: so funny ...here's a link to the first bit. . Thanks again
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hF_bFPMZy6Q