>> ^westy:

All the non dancing stuff and technical aspects timing of the lights and the general structure and design of when the lights went on and off and the basic layout of people was really really good.
the specific dancing and raw dance moves were very pore though still the top point more than made up for it and if they are people that don't normally dance doing it then they did really well.


*sigh*

>> ^Fletch:

@westy
The dancing was awesome, imho, and the lights and timing just made it so much more than that. As for them being people "that don't normally dance", guess again.


Well they certenly rnt very tight they look like a bunch of people that just learnt the general moves but not how to execute them sharply.



If they enjoy it then that's cool but if I was paying to see them id expect better dancing.

@westy

The dancing was awesome, imho, and the lights and timing just made it so much more than that. As for them being people "that don't normally dance", guess again.

Still miss you like Westy misses his dictionary and like Blankfist misses his Galaxy.

>> ^westy:

This is just annoying , Yes its possible for sum one to compose general music around random notes.
seems like a mastabatory celebration of the protentoise interpretation of what a piano is.


Well I, for one, completely agree with westy. Ms. Kronenberg's arrangement of this piece belies the typical human ignorance involved when trying to project the metaphysical onto the postmodern darkness of the everyday conditional object. Her lack of finesse when dealing with the emotional spectrum involved with the derivatives of dialectical emotional power is clumsy at best. At worst it becomes a maladroit nightmare of unresolved, vernal weltschmerz.

Additionally, my balls can play the key-fiddle better than this chump.

>> ^westy:

This is just annoying , Yes its possible for sum one to compose general music around random notes.
seems like a mastabatory celebration of the protentoise interpretation of what a piano is.


These notes are not that random - it's a complete redub. A lot of the note clusters the eye picks up wouldn't make sense in terms of the audio if any of those were actually notes that the baby was playing. The note velocities and pedal work also don't match. Note there's no ambient noise, nor sound of the baby cooing or laughing.

Also, maybe lighten up: it's only a cute baby video.

LOL!!!
In reply to this comment by westy:
This is just annoying , Yes its possible for sum one to compose general music around random notes.

seems like a mastabatory celebration of the protentoise interpretation of what a piano is.

>> ^critical_d:

Nice!
Any plans to port this to the Sift?


/looks at westy.

>> ^grinter:

>> ^westy:
I know these devises work and are excellent.
however in this case I think its highly unlikely she would have been seriously hurt /substaintaily berried without the bag.
The snow didn't have much of a chance to brake up and envelop here and was mostly large chunks rolling down the hill side , not giving much of an opertunity for the bag to really function.
obviously someone can die stuck under just a small amount of snow , There are far far more impressive demonstrations of the technology actually working with dummies falling down huge mountines in massive avalanches.

Do you have a link to one of those demos?

Seriously @westy, thank you. IMO you are exactly right about all of this.

I think it's best described as the Michael Bay Movie of all Video Games.

>> ^westy:

I know these devises work and are excellent.
however in this case I think its highly unlikely she would have been seriously hurt /substaintaily berried without the bag.
The snow didn't have much of a chance to brake up and envelop here and was mostly large chunks rolling down the hill side , not giving much of an opertunity for the bag to really function.
obviously someone can die stuck under just a small amount of snow , There are far far more impressive demonstrations of the technology actually working with dummies falling down huge mountines in massive avalanches.

Do you have a link to one of those demos?

>> ^westy:

I would rather a kid get all these questions wrong but understand the basics of scientific methadoligy , you can learn facts and history over time as you get older but if you dont understand critical thinking and scentific method then you will litraly fill your brain with shit and evan worse not know the shit from the non shit.


I'd wager that most of those people don't know the scientific method either.

Yeah they should have asked them to name 30 large corporations that have power over congress. >> ^westy:

I would rather a kid get all these questions wrong but understand the basics of scientific methadoligy , you can learn facts and history over time as you get older but if you dont understand critical thinking and scentific method then you will litraly fill your brain with shit and evan worse not know the shit from the non shit.

>> ^westy:

companies exist to make money and you will find that The larger and older a company gets the less it cares about anything but the bottom line.
This is why emphasis should be on suporting small buissiness and taxing the hell out of large bussinesses , Or enforsing that larger companies have to pay every employee within a % of the most paid employee so everyone shairs in the wealth not just the top shair holders.
Like the internet for a economy to be safe it needs to be highly redundant have everything dependent on 2 banks and 5 coperations and one big fuck up takes the whole system down.


you know that's an interesting take on it, I always thought that caps on salaries is the obvious way to go, but I like your idea of just paying all workers a % of the highest paid worker (i.e. the CEO). It's a way of keeping the ability to pay your CEO well when they perform, but a recognition that the regular employees all contributed to the success.