A 3% annual risk does not translate to a 100% risk in the next 30 years. For such a smart guy, that's a pretty basic mistake to make, and just makes the public mistrust the "experts" even more when their predictions don't come true.

Translation: We have confidence that the president did commit a crime. The ball is in your court. The court of law.

Look where his confidence is.

What he really said is what he really meant.

If Muller was a cop on the scene of a house with billowing smoke, he could have told the reporters, "If we had confidence that the house was not on fire, we would have said so."

It's not the job of the cop to put the fire out. That job belongs to the firefighters.


BTW, nice play on words. "Nancy Policy." I say, run with it!

Any person with a decent mental faculty should be able to properly translate that to "Congress, the ball's in your court, now read the report and charge the man to protect the country & democracy" right? Right?

He just finished watching The Watchmen, rough translation, "Fuck Ozymandias!".

this right here is what drives me absolutely bonkers.

you proceed from a false premise:
that "wealth" translates to being less corruptible.

blindly ignoring what wealth actual not only IS,but what it represents to the elite class in America.

power.

so could we please STOP with how much trump is actually worth,as if it has any inherent meaning in terms of power?


i do not understand wasting time with an ideologue,or dissecting his obviously conflicting comments as somehow expressing a clear and definable philosophy.these people play in the realm of cult of personality,spectacle and magical thinking.

their adoration for a particular public figure is cultish,and has very little to do with reality but more how their idol represents an ideal that they feel very strongly about.

so are we really surprised that bob will give Alexandria ocasio cortez a nod for exposing how easy it is to corrupt the system,but then conveniently excuse his idol and give him a pass based on the flimsiest of reasons:wealth.

when it was Alexandria ocasio cortez's lightning round that exposed how it is actually EASIER for the executive branch and the president to sell their influence for money.

but to bob,and how he sees things,the very idea that trump would ever engage in a breach of morality,and break his promise to the American people...is preposterous,...because trump already has money,why would he sell his integrity?

because BOB has integrity.
because BOB would never break a promise.
this is basic projection of ones morality onto a figure they admire.
we can apply the exact same metric to those who voted for Obama.same thing.same results.

you will never get bob to admonish his hero,because that hero represents the IDEA of what bob is projecting,not the actual reality.

fundamentalists engage in the exact same magical thinking.

so how can i get mad for bob,and the other trumpsters of the world?
i pity them.
because delusional dreams always crash on the shores of the real eventually.

and that is going to be a sad day for bob.

Translated lyrics

Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Where are your heroes
Athlete's body?
Where are your idols
Unshaven, well dressed?
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
In their eyes dollars
In their smiles diamonds
Me too, one day
I'll be handsome as a God
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Apollo 2000
Zero defects, twenty-one years
It's the ideal man
Charm masculine
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy

Also, same routine translated into Australian:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfnnGSkJ-2U

I communicate 70*80% with clients at work through email, and I totally get this. Any time, I have something that isn't coming across right, instantly I need to pick up the phone.

I've also told my son that I won't discuss things with him through text any more. Doesn't matter what I say in response to his texts, he thinks I'm mad at him, and I think he's mocking me lol

Though in person, or by phone, everything always sounds perfectly acceptable. "Tone of voice" doesn't translate in short sentences,

Is the punchline somewhere in the translation?

I'm confused unless this is just nonsensical.

Anyone?

*education

English translation please!

Your video, Easy way to translate Morse code, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 27 Badge!

Channel name translated by Google: Zahid Leif
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNaYh8lDu4fkmW0Bx3E0KlQ

Self-link *ban

watermark on video says recipe rannaghor

channel is easy ranna recipe when translated by google and in channel page (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOtsCN8ZvHBBVvffNIhS_ew)

username is easy-ranna-recipe


self post

*ban

Could someone who speaks better French than I do translate what the station announcer says at the end?

Yes. Distrust of one untrustworthy nation doesn't translate into trust of their untrustworthy enemies.

International distress frequencies jammed. That's war crime #1. Firing on lifeboats, war crime #2.
You can convince yourself that their unambiguous identification of it as an American ship before attacking is meaningless, you still can't excuse the multiple war crimes.