Does anyone else think like me that this is telling us what we ALREADY know?, hell, it may even be a new political tactic - like when Barack Obama complained about the lobbyists influencing politics in America, my how things have changed from then. Wait....

It's well known amongst demon worshipers?

See, you were just complaining about apostasy in another post today. And yet it sounds like you're sort of buying into some sort of weird, middle ages Malleus Maleficarum stuff here. Nowhere in the bible does it say that marijuana use is a sin. Am I wrong about that? Or is this something that god told you personally? To me, it sounds like you're just buying into the antiquated perception of mainstream society that says that marijuana use is "evil". So you're going to base your gospel (remember, you're the one who's preaching) on the words of Aleister Crowley now? All of a sudden Aleister Crowley is the last word on what's holy or unholy? Seems to me like he's the last person whose word you would want to take on the subject.

Oh, but you used the word "abuse" right? Drug "abuse" is sinful and Satanic? Well, isn't the abuse of anything sinful and satanic? So it's kind of a moot point right? Can't you just as easily abuse butter, or adrenaline or the bible?

Well what about the legitimate use of a drug? Is using aspirin sinful and satanic? It sounds to me like you're pretty much writing off the use of any marijuana ever. Well what about someone dying of leukemia who hasn't eaten in a week because they're so sick? I'd like to see you say to that person that they were worshiping demons for taking marijuana to help them eat. That the sick or the dying should not receive comfort because of something Aleister Crowley said.

It sounds to me like you're guilty of letting the devil convince you of something that God has yet to let us know about.

I won't even get into the whole "burning bush" thing since I know you prefer to take any bible verse that suits your purpose literally.

>> ^shinyblurry:

What you think about me has no bearing on my witness here. Even if no one believes me, at least they will have the information if they ever wake up. Satan is real, and anyone who doesn't know God has been utterly deceived by him. It's been well known amongst demon worshippers that marijuana opens you to spiritual realms controlled by Satan. Aliester crowley stated that very clearly in his book of the law. Drug abuse of any kind is sinful and satanic, and invites possession.
>> ^Ryjkyj:
Shiny, it's comments like that that truly help illustrate the level of your ignorance.

What you think about me has no bearing on my witness here. Even if no one believes me, at least they will have the information if they ever wake up. Satan is real, and anyone who doesn't know God has been utterly deceived by him. It's been well known amongst demon worshippers that marijuana opens you to spiritual realms controlled by Satan. Aliester crowley stated that very clearly in his book of the law. Drug abuse of any kind is sinful and satanic, and invites possession.

>> ^Ryjkyj:
Shiny, it's comments like that that truly help illustrate the level of your ignorance.

That wasn't a joke. I'm not interested in the opinions of corporate think tanks or PR outfits.

In reply to this comment by blankfist:
Your one go-to joke.

In reply to this comment by dystopianfuturetoday:
Thanks for thinking of me. If I want David Koch's opinion on politics, I'll just email him directly.


In reply to this comment by blankfist:

Thanks for thinking of me. If I want David Koch's opinion on politics, I'll just email him directly.


In reply to this comment by blankfist:

He said it himself, "When is it time to start thinking about me?" That's it in a nutshell. Some people are just of the mentality that they take care of themselves first, no matter the circumstances or who it affects. Even if it makes them complete hypocrites. That's a small price to pay. As long as they get what they want, who cares?

>> ^shinyblurry:

I appreciate your concern. Let me assure you that I don't have a mental illness, I don't have any mania, I don't hear voices..I am very balanced, well grounded and internally consistant. I've actually been a counseler for people who have bi-polar, schitzophrenia and even multiple personality disorder. So I am familiar with all the signs and symptons, and I don't have any. If I did I would seek treatment.
>> ^kceaton1:
I'll tell you this one last time. My mania was ENCOURAGED by the religious. Although it was a a mental illness, but they had no knowledge of it... So if in the future you hit the ground running, with those that love you asking you, "Why?", with no understanding...
Think of me then. (And MANY others....)



I know the other conversations are going quick right now, so answer this last.

I'm sorry to say I don't believe you when you say you have experience. I won't specify why too much as it isn't truly needed. What I wish to know is why did I get this answer? To prove to me something? You could have done so with a sincere, "OK" or "I'll look at the classifications; or symptoms".

This response is very terse.

I appreciate your concern. Let me assure you that I don't have a mental illness, I don't have any mania, I don't hear voices..I am very balanced, well grounded and internally consistant. I've actually been a counseler for people who have bi-polar, schitzophrenia and even multiple personality disorder. So I am familiar with all the signs and symptons, and I don't have any. If I did I would seek treatment.

>> ^kceaton1:
I'll tell you this one last time. My mania was ENCOURAGED by the religious. Although it was a a mental illness, but they had no knowledge of it... So if in the future you hit the ground running, with those that love you asking you, "Why?", with no understanding...
Think of me then. (And MANY others....)

I'll tell you this one last time. My mania was ENCOURAGED by the religious. Although it was a a mental illness, but they had no knowledge of it... So if in the future you hit the ground running, with those that love you asking you, "Why?", with no understanding...

Think of me then. (And MANY others....)

I just love photography/video of abandoned buildings/locations. I find it fascinating to see how things are just left, what's left behind, how things age... try to make stories from things left behind.

Love them

Plus, ones like this are especially fascinating for all the work that went into building the place, all the rides, the wild west town, the machinery... and then it's all just left.

It's the leaving it and not reclaiming the land or buildings that, I think, fascinates me. Why is it just left, how is the land not valuable to anyone.

So many questions.

Some great sites if you like this:
http://www.abandoned-places.com/
http://www.opacity.us/

>> ^Drachen_Jager:

Yes, you could post those links. I might actually pay attention to the content, unlike you. You'd apparently prefer to believe what you want in a vacuum of contrary thinking. Which is fine, it's your right, but don't expect people's opinions of you to improve.
<em>>> <a rel="nofollow" href='http://videosift.com/video/FOIA-Lawsuits-Cause-Release-of-New-WTC7-Collapse-Video?loadcomm=1#comment-1166922'>^Duckman33</a>:<br />
What cracks me up is simply because we don't believe the "official story" we are labeled a "dumb fuck truther". Sorry to inform you "dumb fucks", but I do have a right to my opinion as much as you do. As others have already said, I don't buy 100% into the whole truther thing. Never thought Bush was behind this, simply because he's too God damn stupid to pull anything of this magnitude off. He's lucky if he can tie his own fucking shoes by himself! But there are too many inconsistencies in the official story to make it believable. There's nothing wrong with questioning things that don't add up. Don't know why you guys get so worked up about it but it's funny. <br> <br> @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/Drachen_Jager" title="member since April 18th, 2007" class="profilelink">Drachen_Jager</a> I can post just as many links to, and quotes from pages supporting questioning the official story of 9/11 as you can debunking them. Whoopty doo.<br></em>


No I don't prefer to think what I want. I prefer to think about what I have already read and watched on the subject. And I have read and watched a lot on both sides. For some reason you all assume I haven't because I still ask questions. I guess asking questions is not allowed.... Sorry, from now on I'll be a good little robot and keep my mouth shut.

There are many expert opinions on both sides of this subject. Everything from architects and engineers to firefighters. Who's to say which side's opinions are right and which are wrong? Why do you and the others here assume the links you provide to me are the end all truth of the discussion because it follows your line of thinking? Or that I haven't already read them? Much like when I watch the news on TV, or read news articles on the internet, I don't assume the information I read or watch is 100% accurate or correct. But I do give info on both sides my consideration.

Since you mentioned it, here's a link for you read away.

http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html

See, the problem is, this subject isn't cut and dry by any means. There's alot more to this than just WTC 1, 2 and 7. But that's what all "debunkers" always seem to focus on. And that's what you guys think I/we only focus on, because I/we make comments about them on these sifts. However, there's a lot to the official story that doesn't add up. One thing I can think of off hand is the fact that the Government still refuses to release surveillance footage of the Pentagon "attack". That is suspect, and only serves to raise questions. There was a lawsuit placed just to get what little footage has been released so far. The question has already been asked once. Why does it take a lawsuit to get this footage released if there's nothing to hide? The fact that all the material from the WTC site was rushed off to China to be recycled before anyone could analyze it is suspect as well, and only serves to raise questions. I'm sorry if it's so hard for you to accept we are being lied to, or at least not being told the entire story. However, as other have mentioned. The sad reality is it's not the first time, and it certainly won't be the last. Sadam having Weapons of Mass Destruction comes to mind....

What was to gain from this?

http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/trillions.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/transactions.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/gold.html

Kill a bunch of people?

http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/victims/index.html

These links aren't meant to be taken as gospel truth, rather something to think about.

The other two questions are harder to answer. Hence why the whole controlled demolition theory is a hard sell. That doesn't mean people shouldn't still ask questions. In all reality the bottom line is, until someone can build an exact duplicate of WTC 1 & 2, and can then smash jets into them, people can theorize all they want but we will never really know for sure why the buildings collapsed. Good thing for us that isn't the only thing fishy about this.

BTW, I could care less about your or anyone else's opinion of me. I don't know you, or anyone else on this site personally and even if I did, I still wouldn't give two shits what you think. This isn't High School, nor is it a popularity contest. My friends all think I'm nuts, so what? That doesn't change who I am as a person. They understand this and are still my friends. At least they listen to me with an open mind. I got over worrying about what other people think about me when I was 16. Perhaps you should do the same.

[Edit] P.S. No-one has yet to provide the odds of this happening, despite the evidence already produced. Which was my original question.

Likey, indeed!

Nice of you to think of me and nicer to hear from you. Anytime, please. Thank you.

Cheers.
In reply to this comment by calvados:
Likey? It's not even mine but it deserves to get 10:

http://videosift.com/video/Give-A-Little-Love-Noah-And-The-Whale

>> ^gwiz665:

@Duckman33 I get the exact opposite feeling! The film version is done with a smirk and it clear that Herod is a crappy king, the album version tells me "standard, cardboard hero". Which I think makes it boring.
Film Herod reminds me of Jon Lovitz. Weird that we have such an opposite reaction.


I think for me, I grew up listening to the album version for years before I saw the movie, so I'm kind of partial to it. I have noticed folks (me included) tend to gravitate towards the first version of a song they hear and mildly like or even hate other versions, even if the other version was the original recording.

coin operated boy
sitting on the shelf he is just a toy
but i turn him on and he comes to life
automatic joy
that is why i want a coin operated boy

made of plastic and elastic
he is rugged and long-lasting
who could ever ever ask for more
love without complications galore

coin operated boy
all the other real ones that i destroy
cannot hold a candle to my new boy and i'll
never let him go and i'll never be alone
not with my coin operated boy......

this bridge was written to make you feel smittener
with my sad picture of girl getting bitterer
can you extract me from my plastic fantasy
i didnt think so but im still convinceable
will you persist even after i kiss you
goodbye for the last time
will you keep on trying to prove it?
i'm dying to lose it...
i want it
i want you
i want a coin operated boy.

and if i had a star to wish on
for my life i cant imagine
any flesh and blood could be his match
i can even take him in the bath

coin operated boy
he may not be real experienced with girls
but i know he feels like a boy should feel
isnt that the point that is why i want a
coin operated boy
with his pretty coin operated voice
saying that he loves me that hes thinking of me
straight and to the point
that is why i want
a coin operated boy.

Hey, we've got this idea for a commercial - we get these six guys and -

Six?! That sounds expensive, just get two and copy paste

But they'll all be in the same circle going around a-

You leave the thinking to me. Who do you think came up with our amazing theme lyrics?