I like that he's retiring over this, even if he isn't a raging racist, his judgement sucks dick. Telling a terrified woman that you kill people isn't a good way to defuse anything unless she's racist too.

you sure about that? sucking dick at the old folks home can be pretty profitable.

It's better than sucking dick at the old folk's home.

If she doesn't change her policies in response to donations then what are these people paying for?

Look, if Hillary Clinton says she sucks dick for campaign contributions, then I guess the generous thing would be to take her at her word.

Ah Asmo, this is humorous. Not in a way that has me thinking less of you, but due to the fact that even the smartest people make the most indefensible arguments. Stewart always has a joke when Republicans (and sometimes Democrats) do the same thing Chaos just did and which you defended--which is to ignore the "implied" in a statement. Usually Republicans use hate speech or such, but they just don't say the hate literally (Often when Obama's policies were compared to Nazi Germany's policies, for example.)

I.e, "Hey, I'm not saying Obama is like Hitler, but look at the smoke stacks coming from the White House?! They look like Jew smoke to you?!"

Another, but this one in more relation to our conversation.

I.e., Hey Lawdeedaw, when you have dick in your mouth does it taste good? WOAH, I DIDN'T SAY YOU SUCK DICK! YOU IMPLIED THAT! I just asked, you know, when dick is in your mouth...

See how utterly indefensible that above statement is? Or why Stewart gets so pissed, rightly so, when people make that argument? People can hide behind the most obvious statements and it's bullshit. Or people can be ignorant of the statements you make, and it's just as bullshit.

If you can't see the sense that makes, don't respond to this post please. I don't argue with ideology that blinds people to clear points and I have agreed with my fair share of points over the years when I have been wrong...so I expect it returned in kind.

Second, you do have a point about me being judgmental. I am jaded because every marriage I observed growing up was toxic. "Dad can't divorce mom, even tho she abuses us kids." Was a wonderful house I lived in. My wife was beaten for years by her husband, until she took poverty and destitution over that, and then met me. The list goes on and on, yada yada, no more need to explain my own life history because it isn't necessarily what happens in all of America. So I look at the worst aspects of marriage. Aspects that are as universal as the fact that we eat, breathe, shit and die.

Of course I also use history and stats to back up my judgment. So; marriage is a civil contract based on liberty and property (At least the part of marriage that matters to the government insofar as the rights they give you.) If the world's population of homosexuals is around 2.5% or so, depending on the estimates, then cheating (seeking out more than one relationship at a time) is much more naturally inherent to humans than sexual orientation by far. This is also natural in regards to the homosexual relationships as well. Cheating causes so much grief, repercussions, and yet it is only one bad aspect of being tied into a contract that many societies make difficult to break either through legal means or cultural taboos. Furthermore, abuse, divorce, long-term separation for business matters, much of these things kind of lend credence to the fact that marriage is created by society and has nothing to do with the "apparent" definitions we apply to it.

And Asmo, naughty naughty Asmo, you implied something...I am in no way shape or form telling other people what "their relationship is about." Just because I say something is inconvenient for damn near everyone (For some it is not) doesn't really mean much of anything. Shoes are inconvenient because you have to tie their laces. Is that me telling you how to shoe? No. How about kids? Kids are a hell of an inconvenience, but if you said I was degrading parenthood, especially my own, I would tell you to fuck yourself with that bold-faced lie.

If you are focused on the "property" aspect of that comment, well, you have an issue with my definition of the government's hand in marriage.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-grandia/the-30000-global-warming_b_243092.html

http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/08-11-12/

http://www.skepticalscience.com/OISM-Petition-Project.htm

took a whole 30 seconds just for these links.
go ahead..read them...or are you too much a pussy to realize that maybe..juuust maybe..your information is wrong and possibly should be re-examined.

the intelligent man accepts new information and evolves his thinking in accordance with the new information.creating a new paradigm.

the tool will continue to parrot and hold onto tired tropes because he finds them comforting and aligned with his understandings.

i like you man,aint got a single problem with ya but when you post ridiculous shit like you just did....im calling ya out.

why?
because i like ya and i truly think you are a better man than the knucklehead you sometimes portray here.

so..
/lights a smoke
lets go grab a beer and enjoy the warmer weather..
and the sucking dick thing?
yeah...that still costs extra.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'homophobia, kids, schoolyard, blowjob, oral sex, suck dick' to 'homophobia, kids, schoolyard, blowjob, oral sex, suck dick, chewed up' - edited by xxovercastxx

*beg like a duck offering to suck dick for some bread (just one of the animal noises featured).

About that pro-gun idiot in the other video... was anyone else curious about who he is shaking hands with in that framed photo in the background? I sure am lol

"BTW, liberals don't seem self-aware of how obsessed with penis size they are.

They bring it into discussions about everything, as if in liberal heaven, they'd all be sucking dicks constantly."

As opposed to conservatives who see sex and gays everywhere?

BTW, liberals don't seem self-aware of how obsessed with penis size they are.

They bring it into discussions about everything, as if in liberal heaven, they'd all be sucking dicks constantly.

(I trust liberals will approve of this comment, seeing how they approve of the video.)

Well, wait... what kind of dicks are we talking about?
>> ^hpqp:

"You suck dicks" is NOT an insult, goddammit!!

Shh, shh, let it happen.

>> ^Boise_Lib:

>> ^hpqp:
"You suck dicks" is NOT an insult, goddammit!!

"You suck dicks," Shouldn't be an insult, but as things stand now it is.
I would also like to see this changed, but there is a whole lot of inertia behind it.

>> ^hpqp:

"You suck dicks" is NOT an insult, goddammit!!


"You suck dicks," Shouldn't be an insult, but as things stand now it is.

I would also like to see this changed, but there is a whole lot of inertia behind it.

"You suck dicks" is NOT an insult, goddammit!!

"Marijuana is not a drug. I used to suck dick for [meth]. Now that's an addiction. You ever suck some dick for marijuana?"