I like the way it squeaks. Not often you see a Deer make noise.

Oh well if you make it into a race, then we shall see who gets to it first ! I lost all my pockets when my charter ran out, I only have Three slots.

In reply to this comment by ant:
Bah, but it's VOTES! Fine, I will do it but I have to do others first.

In reply to this comment by BoneRemake:
I dont really like posting cutsy stuff like that, seems odd to downvote a lot of it and then to up it. You go nuts if you want, I found it funny how it squeaks like that.

Pip Pip Cheerio

I dont really like posting cutsy stuff like that, seems odd to downvote a lot of it and then to up it. You go nuts if you want, I found it funny how it squeaks like that.

Pip Pip Cheerio

I think Daisy has swallowed a squeak toy.

Excellent post, pretty much exactly what I was thinking as I watched.

I put all the Python tools on my son's laptop so he could play around with command-line programming. I'll have to check out squeak.

In reply to this comment by spawnflagger:
wow. just wow. He needs 8-cores, 12 GB ram, 64-bit OS, to do what a 12MHz 286 running DOS could do 25 years ago ?

Seriously, why did he make a whole OS ? (or half OS, because it doesn't support multiple users, like unix did in 1970). He could have just made a custom shell for "recreational programming" that has all the same features, but would just run in user mode on top of linux/unix/windows (under cygwin at least).

If his goal was to create an RTOS, he certainly didn't show off any real-time features.

This could quite possibly be the most insecure OS ever, everything running in kernel mode, and everything can see all areas of memory. Although doesn't look like he has network support, so no big deal

If you want to do recreational programming, or teach a kid how to program I recommend Squeak (based on SmallTalk)
http://www.squeak.org/About/

If you want to learn x86 assembly, get a DOS virtual machine and use NASM.

wow. just wow. He needs 8-cores, 12 GB ram, 64-bit OS, to do what a 12MHz 286 running DOS could do 25 years ago ?

Seriously, why did he make a whole OS ? (or half OS, because it doesn't support multiple users, like unix did in 1970). He could have just made a custom shell for "recreational programming" that has all the same features, but would just run in user mode on top of linux/unix/windows (under cygwin at least).

If his goal was to create an RTOS, he certainly didn't show off any real-time features.

This could quite possibly be the most insecure OS ever, everything running in kernel mode, and everything can see all areas of memory. Although doesn't look like he has network support, so no big deal

If you want to do recreational programming, or teach a kid how to program I recommend Squeak (based on SmallTalk)
http://www.squeak.org/About/

If you want to learn x86 assembly, get a DOS virtual machine and use NASM.

Oh my god! They're squeaking! Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

>> ^Tingles:

This may, unfortunately, be a dupe of: http://videosift.com/video/Treadmill-Kitties
Up to the mods if the differences in sound let this one squeak through.


Oh balls! I just can't win. I will discard if people think its the right hting to do.

This may, unfortunately, be a dupe of: http://videosift.com/video/Treadmill-Kitties
Up to the mods if the differences in sound let this one squeak through.

You can tell when the door likes it by how loud it squeaks.

Remember that next time your door at home squeaks - You tease.

Her: Honey, I really need you to fix this door, it squeaks.
Him: Fuck the door, I have other things to do.
Her: Ooooookay, whatever gets you to fix it I guess.

If that's what you need to tell yourself, then sure he's trying to carry the shoe, a long..(squeak) long..(squeak) long..(squeak) way.>> ^RedSky:

Are we all completely sure he's not just trying to carry it?

>> ^Hive13:

That is the exact same noise I make when I am doing it. HEY-O!


...with a shoe?

*promote the squeak

>> ^dannym3141:

Correct deano. Brooker has had many sifts here with newswipe and screenwipe and whatever-else-wipe. They always do very well, people find the guy witty and clever.
Yet when an apple product gets bashed by him, they scrunch their eyes up real tight, pound their fists on their desks and squeak their fury.
If people bothered to think for a second, this is a recent SIFT, it isn't a recent production by brooker. He made this long long ago when the ipad was just announced, so all these things you're saying he's "repeating", him and his ilk were the ones who came up with it.
Brooker's paid to be sarcastic and pessimistic about the media, or politics, or whatever his show is about. He's made a living off it and he's pretty well acclaimed. Him and david mitchell are not dissimilar. Mitchell's just a bit more geeky.


An additional note, for those wondering about brooker's geekiness, he was editor of PC zone (like PC gamer, and coincidentally both owned by the same company, despite being rivals) for a good couple of years.