search results matching tag: smurf

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (39)     Sift Talk (1)     Blogs (2)     Comments (101)   

Captured Russian Admits Everything They Were Told Are Lies

newtboy says...

“The Blues”?

Please clarify.

Police?
Democrats?
The Navy?
The Navi?
Smurfs?
Depressed people?
The Blues Brothers?…..

Which “Blues” please.

cloudballoon said:

Coming up next: Putin claims this is an Ukrainian propaganda video forcing a confession under duress/a staged act or whatever hell Putin want to say it is, and most of the old gen Russians will believe him.

Meanwhile, the Blues in America keep on gaslighting POC victims into false statements to keep as many of them in jail to the detriment of the victims, tax-payers, the justice system, and society-at-large, while criminals still walk free and private correctional services providers make a killing.

It's all the same trick of the trade.

A brush with fentanyl almost killed this deputy trainee

Bioluminescent algae in Jervis Bay, Australia

Bioluminescent algae in Jervis Bay, Australia

Ken Burns slams Trump in Stanford Commencement

harlequinn says...

We can only imagine what will happen. Nobody knows.

He is already one of the most powerful men in the world.

He can't seize the reigns. He can only be voted in. I.e., the reigns will be handed to him freely given by democratic vote.

Fascist means such a lot of things nowadays that it is an easy catchall insult. You'll have to elucidate exactly what you mean. Totalitarian? Despot? Anti-democratic? Etc, etc. the list is so long. It's a useless word when it means so many different things. You might as well say "smurf".

"Demagogue". Lol. Yes, he seems pretty good at it too.

Likely is not the same as has. He either has or he hasn't broken as many or more federal laws. And if he has you'd be able to point out the investigations, convictions or some other irrefutably damning evidence. And, just like Clinton, he's innocent until proven guilty.

You forgot an option at the end of your diatribe against Trump. 4) Lacking knowledge of said allegations. Which is not the same as naive.

newtboy said:

You seem to imagine that the "chaos" that a Trump presidency would be confined to the American political arena. It would not. You can be certain that another world wide recession/depression would follow his election, before he's even in office. Financial markets hate uncertainty, and he is the embodiment of uncertainty. That chaos would not go unnoticed by anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together, nor would it be the only chaos he would incite.
I defy you to show one case in history when a power grasping fascist demagogue seizing the reigns of power has ever led to a net positive outcome.

You also seem to not know or care that Trump has been sued 3500 times in the last decades, has likely broken as many or more federal laws than Clinton, brutalizes women personally (that's what it's called when you take a non-citizen wife because she can't say "no" to you, and it's what it's called when you steal from people because you don't pay your bills or fulfil your contracts, causing hundreds of businesses to fail, some owned by women), is a consummate con man, a bully, an idiot, is incredibly gullible and naïve, is incredibly thin skinned, is hyper reactionary, and is a narcissistic demagogue. I say you either don't know or care because you implied he is "better" than Clinton in these areas, which you could only claim because you are either 1) completely naïve on the subject 2) willfully blind to his innumerable faults or 3) intentionally misleading and misguided. Your choice.

Real Time with Bill Maher: Ann Coulter on Immigration

GenjiKilpatrick says...

...O_o? ..did you.. take some shrooms?

Smoke some pot? Pop a molly?

What's up with all these level-headed, non-bigoted remarks you're making all of a sudden.

There's absolutely no way you can be this coherent NOW and not have been completely aware of the egregious insensitive comments you've made in the past.

I swear to FSM that you're a grade A+ troll.

Now, I'm almost certain that @lantern53 is your smurf account.

And you've just been fuckin' with us for the past decade.

Wtf gives? @_@

bobknight33 said:

Both side are right to a point both sides are wrong to a point.

The Ultimate April Fools Prank

43 Cartoon Theme Song Ensemble

Shepppard says...

So, lets see.. It's been a while since I posted this, but lets try and peg all of cartoons from my childhood.

Avatar
Transformers
pokemon
X-men / Sailor moon
Powerpuff Girls
South park
CatDog
G.I. joe?
Family Guy
Pinky and the Brain
Pink Panther
Dexters Lab / The Rescuers
Spiderman
Inspector Gadget
Adventure Time
Babar
Madeline
Smurfs
Doug / Rugrats
Carebears
Dore the Explorer
Spongebob
Futurama / Magic Schoolbus
Muppet Babies
The Simpsons
Peanuts
He-Man
Dragon Ball Z
Thundercats
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
Johnny Bravo
Animaniacs
Tiny Toons
Duck Tales!
Bobbies World
The Jetsons
The Flintstones
Looney Toons

...I know I'm missing a few in there, not sure what they are. Lets see if we can get some people to actually figure them out. *Promote

Smurfs Buying A Cool Drink After Working Out.

oritteropo says...

They were wanted for questioning over an assault charge:

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/four-smurfs-arrested-over-assault-20130109-2cglx.html

The article doesn't explain why they were in fancy dress, but ends with:

The original Smurfs were loveable characters - and did not drive Commodores.

charliem said:

We dont have pledges down here in *Australia.
The best thing I can think of is a house warming party with a dressup theme...

All the ColecoVision™ Games in Fifteen Minutes

All the ColecoVision™ Games in Fifteen Minutes

SlipperyPete says...

Smurf Adventure was the original ragequit game. JUMP OVER THE FUCKING FENCE YOU LITTLE BLUE SHIT. That cartridge got chucked across the room once or twice.

Other nostalgic titles I loved that were in there:
Space Fury
Venture
Antarctic Adventure

All the ColecoVision™ Games in Fifteen Minutes

All the ColecoVision™ Games in Fifteen Minutes

This Is Not Yellow (by Vsauce)

dannym3141 says...

>> ^braschlosan:

>> ^Jinx:
but colour is an invention of our brains anyway? Is yellow a specific wavelength or is yellow what our brain says is yellow whether its red+green together, or "true" yellow.

Either way the light output by your monitor is not 580nm like your brain is telling you but rather an even mix of 650nm and 510nm.
If our eyes didn't "fudge" colors in this way we most likely wouldn't have color television (or monitors)


I didn't read his post like that, maybe he's asking for a definition of yellow because as our cones are basically wavelength filters for photons whilst our brain interprets a message of "hey i caught something of this intensity" from each of them, what is this "yellow" that we all use and think we know what it means? It will eventually come down to the resolution of the eye; each photon from each source will be coming in from a different angle into our eye, by extremely small amounts - the smallest thing we can resolve is where our brain says "ok, i think that's coming from the same place; it's not red and blue separately but yellow."

It'd be the same if you have a green and red patterned circular board and spun it really fast. Our eyes effectively have a "framerate", a point where we see something as motion. Play a game and limit to 1 fps, then increase in say 5's and before 30 you should start to feel motion rather than stuttering frames, then as you keep going you can't see stuttering anymore, it's just all motion. Our eyes have something similar, we used to do it in science. My dad was head of physics and he stuck a ROYGBIV patterned board on a black and decker drill and when it was up to speed it looked white.

So if something registers as yellow to our brains, is that not yellow? We have no direct access to our cones, we just interpret the signals. If all we had were light sensitive cells everything would be one colour and no colour at the same time.

That's what the post meant to me and it's a great point really even if it's just an excuse for sciencey discussion! If yellow is defined as a range of wavelengths of light, he's right to say it isn't yellow, but i doubt many people think of yellow in that sense. Having said all that, the video was actually interesting and informative and i enjoyed watching it, and this is probably a philosophical question for others to bother with.

PS.
Bert and Ernie, Simpsons, Smurfs, South Park, Turtles? Not sure about B&E though.

Robot Chicken: Smurfatar!

siftbot says...

Tags for this video have been changed from 'smurf, gargamel, avatar, meow, smurfette, gargalsmurf, robot chicken, no nipples' to 'smurf, gargamel, avatar, meow, smurfette, gargle smurf, robot chicken, no nipples' - edited by xxovercastxx



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon