I only made it to the :29 mark before I noticed some side boob. Then the whole illusion was ruined...and I continued to watch every second of it.

side boob?

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/chilaxe" title="member since April 27th, 2007" class="profilelink">chilaxe
What's the more important issue here:
1. The murder of 100,000 innocent people by a coalition of top governments.
2. An eccentric pissy hacker that swiped some Swedish side-boob.
Like kranzfakfa said, vegetarian painter was Hilter.
By your logic that means that the Nazi party probably did great stuff!
Back to the main issue tho.
~~~~
"Hundreds of documents released on October 22, 2010, by Wikileaks reveal beatings, burnings, and lashings of detainees by their Iraqi captors. Iraq should prosecute those responsible for torture and other crimes, Human Rights Watch said."
"These new disclosures show torture at the hands of Iraqi security forces is rampant and goes completely unpunished. It’s clear that US authorities knew of systematic abuse by Iraqi troops, but they handed thousands of detainees over anyway."
http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2010/10/24/iraq-wikileaks-
documents-describe-torture-detainees


HOW DARE YOU! Hitler WAS NOT a Vegetarian! So sayeth QI so it shall be remembered!

@chilaxe
What's the more important issue here:

1. The murder of 100,000 innocent people by a coalition of top governments.

2. An eccentric pissy hacker that swiped some Swedish side-boob.

Like kranzfakfa said, vegetarian painter was Hilter.
By your logic that means that the Nazi party probably did great stuff!

Back to the main issue tho.
~~~~

"Hundreds of documents released on October 22, 2010, by Wikileaks reveal beatings, burnings, and lashings of detainees by their Iraqi captors. Iraq should prosecute those responsible for torture and other crimes, Human Rights Watch said."

"These new disclosures show torture at the hands of Iraqi security forces is rampant and goes completely unpunished. It’s clear that US authorities knew of systematic abuse by Iraqi troops, but they handed thousands of detainees over anyway."

http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2010/10/24/iraq-wikileaks-documents-describe-torture-detainees

You know, right about the point in the interview where they talk to her live and she is wearing a revealing blouse, with side boob, I thought I was watching "The Onion". It was kinda surreal for a minute or so there.

edit- One last thing. One point about the surrealism that I will use as an example. In the interview they cut away and show her in a sundress that shows a fair amount. But, then they zoom in on the picture. Seriously, I think The Onion could do the same bit without changing too many things.

doubleeditftw- Also, down to the bottom right while they're doing the interview... Is it just me or is that plastic hair?

Watch for the side-boob bounce at 42-51 sec.

I'll take a side hug with a side of side boob

Tags for this video have been changed from 'family guy, side boob, peter griffin, comedy' to 'family guy, side boob, bewb, peter griffin, comedy' - edited by calvados

I gotta tell ya, Doc, you raised my hopes and dashed them cruelly. They totally could've flashed some Kilcher side-boob, but nooooo.

*femme

Now with side-boobs!

Agreed with ren; for the record, I downvoted "Choco Party" for the very reason you brought it up here - I imagine Ant may have had similar logic.

I hadn't seen the tennis one before, but I'll be glad to downvote it now (done) since it's not especially funny/interesting.

Going back to this vid, "Side boobs" are the key little flesh-coloured boundary line between pr0n and non pr0n for actual "sexual things" (as opposed to non-use/fondling, in which case there's more leeway, i.e. Ridgemont) according to the dynamic definition that has evolved at VS (reference: look up the naked boss video).

Since there's contact/fondling, this video just barely passes (very strategically placed arm there!).

bnsa, one thing that's key, is the importance of the nsfw tag - it's probably allowed a bit more boundary pushing at the Sift thant here was before. There are still limits (no hardcore pile-ups), but artistic/cultural/humour arguments exist to allow a vid to stay (the "Instructional Kissing Video" was great b/c it spawned the posting of the Oz version as a kind of gender balancer).

I think it's safe to *return this now.

I don't get it.. a great, intelligent video like this.. (which also has hot side-boob)... gets no votes. But freakin' Peanut Butter FederLine is almsot front page. bah!