Your video, Howard Schultz and Cliff Sims Stumble in Interviews: A Close, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

This ,
Fusion GPS,
Clinton / DNC paying for the fake Dossier,
DNC / Clinton Russia connection--
Democratic IT staffer Imran Awan
Debbie Wasserman schultz issues

All this amounts to death by a thousand paper cuts.

Yes, I think more voted for Trump than voted against Obama because they finally had someone to vote FOR instead of AGAINST.

No, you said "refuting the white racist voters brought Trump in fallacy. Somehow they didn't come out to vote against a black guy..." and I'm saying that, without the white racists, he would have lost, so they DID 'bring Trump in' and did 'vote against the black guy', but in smaller numbers.....again. You didn't say they didn't vote for him, but you said their votes didn't make a difference, I disagree.

I guess YOUR personal bias is blinding YOU, because I also said EXACTLY that, repeatedly, starting in the first reply, that Clinton and Schultz drove independents and moral Democrats away....it was a combo punch. Racists emerged AND moderates stayed home, and had either been different, the outcome would have been different.
I never refused to recognize the hatefulness in America, I stated clearly and repeatedly when the DNC fiasco happened that Clinton had just lost to hate, because that's what Trump is, the leader of the party of hate and angst.

Some of us refuse to ignore blatant racism just because it might be more pleasant to do so. Clearly, you aren't in that camp. I have been clear that not all, or even a majority of Trump voters are blatant racists, but they all are willing to stand shoulder to shoulder with blatant racists and support blatantly racist policy....nothing to do with where they work and all about what they say and do, plenty of left leaners work with their hands...I'm a trained welder for instance.

I would agree that Clinton -Schultz mess did not help.
A better / closer race would have been Bernie VS Trump.
I think Bernie would have won over Trump.

Democrats put the wrong horse in the race.

Not all. When Clinton and Schultz stole the nomination, this "liberal" stated clearly and repeatedly that she had just handed the election to Trump....I would say Clinton and Schultz bitch slapped the liberals.....now as to the pundits, yes, and he's still rubbing their nose in it.
What an egoless unifier he is, and what an amazing job he's done at bringing the country closer together already.

I'm so angry this man is not my president elect right now.

Good work douchebags. You thought you were so clever with your fucked up voting strategies, bitching about "lesser of two evil" choices, refusing to vote and taking a stand against...whatever the fuck you thought you were doing. Now we have a thin skinned, narcissistic, ignorant, man-child for our president.

Stop trying to rationalize this. This is not a voter revolt, this is not a paradigm shift in politics, this is not Hillary Clinton's fault or Debbie Wasserman Schultz's doing; this is the result of the masses falling for decades of misinformation combined with an emotional appeal to our worst instincts by a demagogue. You fell for it while you patted yourself on the back for being so much smarter than everyone else. Now we're fucked.

So grow the fuck up and do something to fix this.

If the "Liberal Elite" within the Democratic Party hadn't been so pigheaded and worked against Bernie at every turn, and maybe accepted him as a candidate, then maybe this interview would be with President Sanders.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz being immediately appointed to the head of Clinton's campaign after the Wikileaks revealed how she was undermining Sanders behind the scenes showed just how out of touch the party had become. Without realizing it, the "Liberal Elite" of the Democratic Party chose Trump to become the next president.

Meanwhile, Lawrence Lessig---who was running on the single most important issue facing American Democracy today---couldn't even get on the ballot during the primaries.

*related=http://videosift.com/video/Debbie-Wasserman-Schultz-Resigns-Sanders-Fans-React

*related=http://videosift.com/video/Hillary-Clinton-Accepts-Democratic-Nom-to-1-2-Empty-Arena

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Booed By Florida Delegation has been added as a related post - related requested by notarobot on that post.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Booed By Florida Delegation has been added as a related post - related requested by notarobot on that post.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Resigns, Sanders Fans React has been added as a related post - related requested by notarobot.

Hillary Clinton Accepts Democratic Nom to 1/2 Empty Arena has been added as a related post - related requested by notarobot.

This is really important. *promote
MM lays out how REAL a President Trump is, based on some of Hillary's fatal flaws, like the TPP support and the loss of the Rust Belt support.

http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/michael-moores-5-reasons-why-trump-will-win

Yet she still continues to make poor choices, like double-down on Wall Street/Banking support with Caine, and a big wet sloppy kiss to Wasserman-Schultz after evidence surfaces of their conspiracy. This is the behavior of the Entitled, not the Deserved.

The Democratic Party having control of both the executive and legislative branches does not mean Congress will go along with whatever the president says. Do you remember Obamacare at all? Was Obamacare what Obama wanted? No. It was a center left compromise to keep Democrats in the fold to vote for it. The Democratic Party still has a significant number of moderates within it.

Do you honestly think Obama got whatever he wanted his first two years in office with control of the house and a supermajority in the Senate? Absolutely not.

In fact, because of filibusters and polarization of the electorate, you can't get much of anything done anymore without control of the house and a supermajority in the Senate.

And the Shultz thing is hilarious to me. Clinton hired a high up skilled Democratic Party political operative for her campaign, and that means she's corrupt? Because Schultz favored a candidate who has always been a strong party candidate over another candidate who only caucused with the Democrats, and wasn't actually a Democrat himself? Yeah, she shouldn't have done what she did. Dennis Rodman shouldn't have done what he did to Scottie Pippen in the playoffs, too, when he was with Detroit. And who thought Rodman should have been brought in to help the Bulls? Pippen. Clinton is trying to win an election. If that's the kind of thing you consider as proof of actual corruption, I don't know what to tell you.

I am not voting against Trump. I am voting for the most competent, experienced candidate who I think will do the best job out of this lot of candidates. She is the only candidate who is extremely qualified.

Is she perfect? Hell, no. She isn't particularly inspiring. She's not very good as a politician at persuading people to her side. She panders too much. Sometimes she plays political games too much, like with the email fiasco.


But you can do a lot worse than Clinton. You don't have to go back far to find an inept president.

It's so involved that Hillary had to have known. She may be dishonest, but she isn't stupid.

I came across this comment on reddit:

"
We all know Debbie Wasserman Schultz (DWS) was the co-chair of Hillary's 2008 presidential run, where she lost the nomination to Obama. So, in order to lock down the nomination for 2016, Hillary was able to get DWS in charge of the DNC and manipulate it from within. That's the theory anyway, except....

In order for this to work, they would first have to, not only get the DNC chair to step down, but also get them to recommend DWS for the position. The Clinton's would have to promise something to that person, something more prestigious than being head of the Democratic party. So who was that person and what did they get in return?

It would appear that Donna Brazile was in-line to get the position, but she was only the interim chair after the previous chair left, served only one month. According to this, http://rulers.org/usgovt.html#parties, the previous chair of the DNC prior to DWS was Tim Kaine.

Yes, HRC Vice President running m8 Tim Kaine.

www.nytimes.com/2016/07/23/us/politics/tim-kaine-hillary-clinton-vice-president.html?_r=0

"

/sauce:

https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4ur359/atheist_group_calls_for_dnc_cfo_to_resign_over/d5scevf