Oh poo, my URL doesn't seem to have been posted. Just google: "MIT passing laws"

This is a prime example of the fallacy of "dog guilt". According to people who know better than I dog's aren't believed to understand contextual responsibility like humans i.e. they don't get the idea that they did something wrong but simply that something IS wrong.

So for instance if there is poop in the room they understand from experience that the owner will go ape shit when they find it. They do not however understand that because THEY did a poo the owner will go ape shit.

That guilty look/walk/hiding in the corner is because the Dog knows the human is likely about to behave irrationally. Every time there has been poop in the room or the owner has walked in on them in a particular place etc. the owner has hit them or shouted or whatever so they know bad things are coming.

The crucial difference is they don't understand the idea that its their fault, only the set of circumstances leading up to it.
This may mean you get some very limited positive effect from punishment as the Dog will realise that not going to a particular place etc. seems to avoid the bad thing happening but as far as understanding that they have behaved badly it wont get you anywhere.

Rewards for desirable behaviour are orders of magnitude more effective than trying to discourage the bad because of this. Dogs don't have morals they just want to please you and trying to appeal to their sense of decency is a waste of both your time, all you will get is a dog that's been scared into inactivity.

If you don't want them to poop on the carpet then you should simply reward them for pooping where you do want them to go. It wont take long before they only poop in the places you rewarded them because deep down all that little doggie wants in life is for you to be happy with them and give them attention.

This dog is basically just cowering and submitting because he's either had, about to have or has previously had an unpleasant experience relating to recent circumstances. It dose'nt know it did wrong but it does understand that the owner is mad/behaving crazy so it assumes a submissive posture and hopes the whole thing will eventually blow over.

Dogs aren't people, their dogs! :-D

You 'n poo or you 'n you know who?

I'm playing-it close to the vest with the dupeage-I was gonna * is dupe one of these but the last time I did I was placed in shackles for duping a non-dupeable doo-poo...abuse of privilege er some such hoo-ha

*promote, because god damn you can't forget this poo poo.

nuclear poo gas postal worker with a nerf gun

Good thing they're in the bathroom, I think some poo came out.

Believe me when you do something like this, you never consider that the density of the average poo is way higher than air, thus you fail to realize how far said shit will fly... it's the way 8 year old me learned something about explosions and how poop tastes in one horrible but funny lesson. I regret nothing!

to be..."fair" conservatives will rally against anything a foreign country does, no matter how beneficial it is. Not on the merits of the actual idea of course, simply because it's a foreign nation is all that is needed for conservatives to poo poo on it.

So he's right, but for the wrong reasons.

For conservatives to *ever* consider gun control, there would probably have to be an american city that enacted some huge gun control enforcement successfully.

or like @dag said, but I think he's being generous. Personally I don't think any real change will happen till no less than a dozen more big mass shootings.

or we abolish lobbying.

or republicans lose big in 2014.

"time to ring the bell"

The music definitely makes this vid. *Bravo
(even though Siftbot, and many others, will poo-poo that invocation..it's my call, so there!)

However, I would be epic to see someone "thread the needle" there (drive against the flow).

Anything can be cool. I'd love to watch competitive diaper changing. Imagine the stay at home dad banter afterwards, wiping baby poo onto each other's butts. *pat* *pat*

˙noʎ ʇıɐq oʇ uɐǝɯ ʇ,upıp ı 'ʎɹɹos
˙pǝɹıʇ s,ʇɐɥʇ ˙ʇuǝɯnƃɹɐ „pooƃ ǝɹɐ sunƃ 'pɐq ǝɹɐ sƃnɹp„ ɐ oʇuı ʇǝƃ oʇ ǝɹǝɥ ʇsod ʇ,upıp ʎןǝʇɐuıɟǝp ı
˙ɔıdoʎɯ sı sƃuıɥʇ ǝsǝɥʇ uo snɔoɟ ʇɐɥʇ ʇno ʇuıod oʇ ʇdǝɔxǝ ˙˙'dıɥsɹǝuʍo unƃ uo ʎɔıןod ɥʇıʍ ɹo sǝɹnƃıɟ ʎʇıןɐʇɹoɯ ɥʇıʍ op oʇ ƃuıɥʇou pɐɥ (ʇsod snoıʌǝɹd ʎɯ ǝʞıןun) oʇ ƃuıpuodsǝɹ ǝɹǝʍ noʎ ʇsod ǝɥʇ 'ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ ɹoɟ
˙ǝuıɟ ˙sn ǝɥʇ uı ǝɹnʇןnɔ unƃ ǝɥʇ ʇnoqɐ ʎɥʇןɐǝɥun ƃuıɥʇǝɯos sı ǝɹǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ ǝǝɹƃɐsıp noʎ os

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by oritteropo.

doo caca poo poo

You'd think that if shinyblurry was correct that scientists would agree with him. Scientists aren't trying to "prove" anything -- they want an orderly universe just as much as shiny does. What do they gain from insisting on the universe being older? Shiny and his ilk have an agenda -- scientists don't.

They have been known to be blinded by their egos, but that doesn't last that long. (Lots of new discoveries and theories have been poo-poo'd before they become accepted wisdom. Because the data is more important. Ego doesn't win in the long run.)

If a scientist could prove the existence of god, a scientist would.

Plenty of scientists do see the hand of god in the orderliness of the data, the elegance of the math, the clockwork of the mechanisms of the universe. They just don't insist on it for everyone.

PAT ROBERTSON THINKS SHINYBLURRY IS MISGUIDED. See link to vid above.