search results matching tag: pants
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.002 seconds
Videos (435) | Sift Talk (22) | Blogs (36) | Comments (1000) |
Videos (435) | Sift Talk (22) | Blogs (36) | Comments (1000) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Vampires vs Werewolves
Man, that amorphous purple blob was hot!
especially in those pants....
Trump Attacks Mueller/McCabe; Facebook suspends CA
Thumbs up ... in my pants!
Asmo (Member Profile)
I just now saw this. My yahoo email account sometimes disappears things on me. I lost another email about the same time.
I absolutely agree with everything you say. Biology is biology. There are differences. Sex is in the workplace, of course, and women bring it there.
I can agree with all these things, and still be creeped out by the indulgence, the wallowing, of only hiring very attractive women.
There is a long history of that in America, and it was creepy then, too. Stewardesses and what they were subjected to in the workplace is a great example. They would lose their -- THEIR WORK -- if they gained five pounds, is an example of really inappropriate use of a woman's appearance as a job qualification. These people are responsible for the safety of the passengers if a tragedy strikes. I love reading stories about how women are heroes and professional when an accident happens.
A shooting range is not a strip club. Wanting to be surrounded by women in your business who COULD work in a strip club is creepy.
Creepy really isn't the right word. It is shorthand for a complex interplay of gender roles and abuses and complicity that is endemic in our culture. I just like the way it feels in my mouth -- I found that Japanese word for it that perfectly explains my pleasure in using it. I am still pleased to know that word exists.
Gitaigo: Onomatopoeia that describes states of being, not sounds.
Creepy perfectly feels like my state of being around this video.
We are all biological beings who like to look at pretty people. Tall men make more money. Attractive people of both genders make more money. We will never be free from those responses.
But lets keep it unconscious, shall we? Let us work to be better human beings than people who reduce ourselves to walking genitalia looking for constant stimulation.
The rest of your points... yeah. I'm right with you. I am not someone who criticizes men for "looking." I find myself looking and I'm pretty firmly on the hetero side of things.
It came up the other day on a hike through the woods. A woman passed me wearing some sort of body hugging stretch pants. There was natural jiggling from her movements, which caught my eye. I found myself staring, I became aware of how perfectly proportioned she was, and how the rest of her was lovely in every aspect (I had seen her a few moments before, walking in a different direction.) I almost called out to my friends -- my god, that is the most beautiful woman. All triggered by a chance glance at an objectively beautiful rear-end.
Biology. It happens. I have no problem with it.
And those shooting range owners want to stimulate that reaction in the workplace, 100% of the time. And that, my friend, is creepy.
I was responding to your comments, as I understood them, and if I got the wrong impression, I apologise. But I think it's somewhat blinkered to say that it's men that bring sex in to the workplace. eg. Most of the young ladies that work in the same building as me wear short skirts or tight pants, lots of decolletage on display etc. That is absolutely their right as long as they meet the dress code of their employer, but it certainly brings sex appeal firmly in to the limelight.
Unfortunately, while men are seen as rather simple creatures biologically when it comes to sex, there is more than meets the eye. The science certainly isn't conclusive, but there is a lot of evidence pointing to desire being a function of the amygdala, which is strongly stimulated by visuals in men. The following article is a pop news summary of a longer (and fairly dry) study which I couldn't find an non-subscription version of, which compares brain activity in response to viewing porn images for both men and women.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/16/health/in-sex-brain-studies-show-la-difference-still-holds.html
Women still get aroused by the images, but the desire that is evoked in the male amygdala is not replicated in the female. Hence men tend to respond far better to objectification than women do. There are other results with further delve the difference between male and female sexuality, and it's not surprising that society as a whole has been molded by our biology.
Probably also explains, at least somewhat, why men (myself included) find it hard to accept criticism for something that comes naturally to most of us. Few men would go to a public place with the express purpose of leering at attractive women, but almost all men (at least the straight ones) will find themselves gazing for longer than perhaps polite at certain women that catch our eye. That is not to take away from the fact that we are generally in charge of our actions, but it certainly adds an imperative that is less about being creepy and more about our biology.
Mordhaus (Member Profile)
Congratulations! Your video, Behold Chainsaw Proof Pants in Action, has reached the #1 spot in the current Top 15 New Videos listing. This is a very difficult thing to accomplish but you managed to pull it off. For your contribution you have been awarded 2 Power Points.
This achievement has earned you your "Golden One" Level 170 Badge!
Mordhaus (Member Profile)
Your video, Behold Chainsaw Proof Pants in Action, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 224 Badge!
Tornado 10-23-2017-Cam2
The guy who come in at 21 seconds regrets not wearing his Brown pants that day.
A great white shark sneaks up on a diver
I hope he had on his brown pants underneath that wetsuit.
newtboy (Member Profile)
Congratulations! Your video, Rick and Morty-The Poop In My Pants, has reached the #1 spot in the current Top 15 New Videos listing. This is a very difficult thing to accomplish but you managed to pull it off. For your contribution you have been awarded 2 Power Points.
This achievement has earned you your "Golden One" Level 78 Badge!
newtboy (Member Profile)
Your video, Rick and Morty-The Poop In My Pants, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
Sarah Silverman Comments on Louis CK
Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)
There must be so many powerful men crapping their pants right now - wondering when their story is going to get out. Good.
Semi Truck Stops Amazingly Fast In An Emergency
Everyone gets a pair of brown pants today.
Always best to wear underwear
But wouldn't you just end up blood staining your work pants instead?
Because it costs too much to keep replacing your blood stained underwear.....Chipotle Away, get some today!
Always best to wear underwear
WHY would you wear pants w/o underwear?!
When your dog mistakes the moon for a ball
Awesome edit would be them coming out back the next day and the moon is sitting there on the ground, big as all Texas. Dog panting in the foreground.
Gaslighting: Abuse That Makes You Question Reality
Let me disabuse you of some of your assumptions...
I didn't do gamergate and I don't really give a fuck about feminism/anti-feminism as it pertains to how I treat women in the real world (that being egalitarian, everyone should be equal).
Now that that's out of the way, yeah, I am for fucking real. Whether it was a stunt or just a bunch of people turning up to a talk which they paid their money to get in to, it doesn't really matter. Sarkessian was the aggressor (unless you truly believe that threaten = criticise someone's ideas online then show up in person to let them have their say), using a position of power, backed up by a bunch of like minded people to abuse paying attendees who's only crime was sitting up the front and listening quietly, which they are entitled to do.
/shockfuckinghorror, never mind free speech, you can't even listen to people anymore without them wetting their pants in terror.
There is plenty of video footage of said event and you are more than welcome to point out to me exactly where in that footage any of the so called aggressors did anything actually aggressive. Aka, the point where my opinion of what went on is different to the reality. I don't need to convince people of the reality of the situation, I can just roll the footage.
She broke the code of conduct, and while other YT'ers were being ejected for being in public areas (a breach of the CoC), she was given an explicit pass by the Greens. Sargon and the rest of the so called aggressors were not ejected or banned from Vidcon which indicates to me that they did nothing wrong in the eyes of the organisers. The aggressors seemed to get along fine with other people they met that they ideologically disagree with, with no other incidents being recorded. Sark, on the other hand, also verbally abused Boogie2988, one of the nicest and most considerate people I've seen on YT, and someone who had gone out of his way not to offend her.
All this is a matter of record, not my opinion. So now comes the question of your integrity. Are you going to actually back up your claims with a little actual evidence, or are you just going to go back to calling names... ; P
Are you for real?
Do you not see that you are literally gaslighting by attempting to paint an individual, who organized a stunt aimed at intimidating another person in public, as the victim of the incident?
I don't even give a shit about gamergate or the feminism/anti-feminism celebrity battle that you, clearly, have taken a side on. I don't support anyone involved because all of the participants appear to be acting like asshats. But any objective viewer can see that one side made a bold move to aggressively provoke an opponent and succeeded in their goal of getting a response. It was bullying and abusive and it illicited an undignified response.
Let me reiterate, I am not your opposition in your crazy war. But I have to point out that it is a perplexing bit of mental acrobatics for you to attempt to perpetuate a false reality by accusing an intended victim of trying to perpetuate a false reality.
That's a clown move and if you had any integrity you would pause a moment for a little self examination.