I couldn't find out, but I am assuming she possibly had on the pants and was trying to shoplift them. Alternatively, they might have lied and claimed she was a suicide risk so they could take them and humiliate her. Either way, they could have given her a pair for court instead of marching her up there in panties.

The face-to-pantie ratio he is talking about has nothing to do with the ladies' faces...

McAfee is not someone you want to publicly be in your camp. I thought he was actually still wanted for murder, and he certainly doesn't have a clean history of rational behavior.

It's insane that the feds have repeatedly, and under oath, claimed this is a one time thing...when it's clear that there are hundreds and hundreds of other phones they, and other government organizations want and plan to unlock with the 'tool' today, not to mention how they'll use it tomorrow, or what happens when it's 'released into the wild', which WILL happen. Government internet security is a joke.

No surprise at all that Trump is on the wrong side of this issue.

EDIT: Really, a downvote for that ^ comment? Someone has their panties in a bunch.

i have been watching interviews where prominent comics are refusing to do gigs at universities due to the fact that the PC culture has become so saturated that they can't even do their bits,and it becomes a horror show.

young,educated people who mistake their own little bubble-world and attempt to project their sense of morality onto others by demanding changes in language and attitude by way of shrill harpy speak,is totally missing the point of humor.

comedy is the examination and critique of certain truths we may hold sacred,and expose the absurdity.a good comedian can do this fairly well,a great comedian does so with a finesse that is epic.

see:george carlin.lenny bruce,bill hicks,patrice o'neal,bill burr,louis ck.doug stanhope

so i have to disagree with you @Imagoamin.
comedians who thrive on being edgy are not thriving just for the simple fact of being edgy or controversial.they thrive because they are adept at exposing the absurdity of life in such a way that makes us all laugh.....at ourselves.

they experience pushback constantly in the form of heckling and jeering,and do so on a nightly basis and do not get upset that people get offended by their material.that is the very boundary they are pushing!

self examination,criticism and the ability to accept that maybe those things we held so dear are,in fact,absurd and in need of ridicule.the great comedians all give us a great,totally effective self-cleansing pill.they call it "the get the fuck over yourself" pill.

but the overly sensitive PC culture that is festering in our current higher education institutions is creating a new breed of human that lacks basic self-awareness and,on the whole,a gaggle of humorless cunts.

humor is a concept beyond their ken.they dont get it and instead of relaxing a bit,they prefer to get their panties in a knot over.....words.so they all get together and tweet and facebook,in order to share their outrage and make their little signs and march in front of a chris rock show with absolutely zero sense of irony.

to them they are striking a blow for justice!

which is just absurd,and in desperate need of ridicule.

@ChaosEngine

if you are referring to the established political class,the pundit class and those with relative power and influence i would agree with your assertions.

which is pretty much what i am talking about.

if you look how ron paul was being treated by his own party and compare that treatment to sanders by the DNC,there are some glaring similarities.

while both paul and sanders have differing politics,they did align in a few areas i.e: audit the fed,citizens united,money in politics and restructuring the military to name a few.

they both had/have immensely popular grassroots support.ron paul garnering 20 million in small donations and sanders broke that record with 30 million.

they both held large rallies with high attendance.

they both had a populist flavor that appealed to their own political base.challenging the current corrupt power structures.

and they both have/had experienced a weird media blackout,even though they were/are incredibly popular with the voters.

now we can question WHY that is,but i don't think it too much a stretch to come to the conclusion that both candidates challenged the current power structures that dictate this countries dysfunctional and corrupt political system.add to that mix a paid propaganda pundit class that never challenges the current narrative,all put on display on corporate media which is owned by what? 5-6 entities? who just happen to be the biggest lobbyists in this country?

nader experienced pretty much the exact same treatment from the DNC in regards to media exposure and it went even further in his case with him being outright denied to some debates,or made to jump through almost insurmountable dictates to even get ON the debates.

so when i assert this is a well crafted and intentional practice by the parties,i do so with precedent.

because all three,nader,paul and sanders all had/have massive public support from the voters,but not their respective parties.

so when ron paul started to become a real thorn in the RNC,who did not want him anywhere near the nomination.they changed the tactic from ignoring or downplaying pauls message..to creating the "kook" myth.this was from his own party!!

nader received similar treatment,though in a different context.the establishment as a whole came out against him.

so what can we assume,based on previous tactics from these political parties in regards to sanders?when they can no longer ignore his popularity? his grassroots campaign donations? his rally attendances?

there will soon come a time when they can no longer ignore sanders and his grassroots success,and they will respond the exact same way they did with nader and paul.they will concoct a narrative that plays on peoples fears and biases and begin to portray sanders as an anti-capitalist "kook".that somehow him being a democratic socialist means the end of our civilization.just the word "socialist' makes many a republican wet their panties.

could i be wrong?
oh please god let me be wrong.
i happen to like much of what sanders is promoting,not everything,i have issues with some of what he proposes,but over-all i dig not only what he is saying but how he is going about conveying his message.

there is one huge problem if sanders gets the nod,and that is the support you mentioned.he has almost none in the legislature.which will make much of what he is trying to change in washington damn near impossible.

which will create it own political mess and just create fodder for the pundit class to ineffectually pontificate on,just so they can have a job.

i think it would be such a great thing for this country if sanders got the nomination,but the establishment has already made its intentions clear:they dont want sanders,they want hillary.the establishment does not play by the rules nor do they play nice.

playing by the rules and being decent is for the peasant class.

hope i am wrong.
i hope that every single point i made will never occur.
i hope that sanders gets the nod and things may change,because this country needs a fucking enema.
but my cynicism really struggles with that kind of hopeful optimism.

I wonder if it raises and lowers your score based upon your porn searches. You're looking for an anonymous terminal just so you can watch your panty sniffers porn, which would lower your score. Maybe I should just sniff panties in real life?

Oh no, the secret police tracked your anonymous login, which is illegal btw, so now the entire country knows you like sniffing panties. Ha ha ha!

It could be filmed like a television program, sort of a I don't know a To Catch a Predator vibe. Lure these men into anonymous login booths and watch them search for porn and then get caught by the government.

Not only does this web search constitute the lowering of your credit score, but it was an anonymous search not tied to your social media account, therefore illegal. Prepare to be shamed Pee Wee style. Paging Mr. Herman. We have a pervert. China no rikey.

Why are those clown ass niggas wearing panty hose on their heads?

No, don't overthink it. It's not some deep complicated reaction to artificial gender\comedy\social issues you read about in blogs, it's just stale humor to me. I'm sure many find her deadpan delivery of facial cream-pie queef soiled panty jokes to be ground-breaking. If Eisenhower was in the White House I'm sure I would think so too but it's been done a billion times.

If you don't laugh at the "why did the chicken cross the road" joke does that make you an animal rights activist?

No Bob, you have failed.
You and all the other citizens of the US. You allowed your government to became a corrupt, for-sale pseudo democracy. Why? Because you voted for the wrong fucking people or didn't vote at all.
Maybe I'm wrong but my instincts tell me you vote republican. That's even worse. While you got your panties in a knot over the two gays down the street trying to marry, your party leaders sell the future of your country to the highest bidder. They're throwing one ridiculous diversion after another at you (Obama ain't american, Benghazi!, The gays!1!1), which you gobble up like the good boy you're supposed to be, while they redefine free speech as money donations and bribery as lobbying. Corporations ain't people, my friend. But who cares? As long as we build a big ass fence on our border.
The problem is you. You have a vote, a voice and you could use it to put the right people in power. What have you done with it?

At the 21 second mark she is clearly wearing some kind of panty. There's a waistband and a mimsy-panel.

@lantern53
stop moving the goddam goal posts to fit your apologist narrative!

police have strict procedure and protocol to follow and should be held accountable when those officers step over the line.in fact,they should be held to higher standard then the rest of us because they wield immense power and authority over us normal citizens.

what REALLY burns my balls is that YOU should be the first to call these little turd-nuggets out on their bullshit,but no,what do we get from you on a consistent basis:

whining and crying on how people just dont understand how hard your job is and that we cannot even conceive the pressure a police officer is under,

now maybe their is some truth to all that but nobody put a gun to your head forced you to be a police officer.so dont act like you didnt know what you were getting into,that is just pathetically weak.stop acting like a pussy and man up.

should this officer get fired?
or arrested?
fined?
jailed?

i really have no idea but how about some goddam accountability?
how about consequences for bad decisions?
how about holding your profession to a higher standard than that of a common fucking thug?
where is your goddam pride?

jesus lantern,you make it sound like your entire profession has turned into a gaggle of panty-waist pussies.

man up for fucks sakes!
cuz we sure as fuck have to and you dont see us crying like whiny little bitches.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Amy Schumer, Clown Panties, Comedian, Balloons' to 'Amy Schumer, Clown Panties, Comedian, Balloons, inside amy schumer' - edited by Grimm

That's garter be a little embarrassing, being caught short like that. He probably needed to purchase them after visiting one of Canada's famous knickerless parks. I think we all have a vested interest in this subject as voters. That said, I have large-array of delicates I'd like to see them discuss and I'm sure there is some pretty interesting dirty laundry in such a place; but camisole get a break from all this panty politics?

Unfortunately the Indian man can NEVER unwad his panties since they broke his neck and at least partially paralyzed him. Lots of good the arrest does him at this point...but the $25million he'll get from the department will help.

If there's not a conviction and serious jail time, look out. It's nearly open season on officers as it is, you all need to stop making more, angrier enemies....yesterday.