Immediately explained because there is no question whatsoever that’s what it was.

You have all this fake information…but from where? I know you won’t answer because it’s embarrassing….because the answer is Twitter.
None of it resembles the official reports from police, not one detail is close to correct. It’s pure unadulterated lies you bought hook line and sinker because you want to, or that you made up yourself, not because you have a scintilla of evidence, and it’s all 100% opposed by the reality that an armed MAGgot drove to Pelosi’s house with weapons and zip ties, broke in, and beat an 82 year old man he pulled out of bed with the hammer in front of police, fully dressed, screaming “where’s Nancy”.

I think you people took the fact that he’s a nudist and pretended he was nude at the failed assassination….no, that’s almost rational, I now see Musk just made it up, tweeted it out to millions, then quietly retracted it once he planted the seed of insanity in your fertile skulls, and it grew like a weed in the manure you keep there. Every accusation you make is an admission.

Depapi is pure, undeniably MAGA. You have no evidence otherwise. Police have tons to back that up.
He is far right politically, not all over the place. There were no guards, no dogs, no cameras, no alarm, no third person, no tall wall, no attacker in his underwear. Every bit of that is made up by far right liars like yourself to try to hide from the fact that he’s absolutely one of you, just like you, a splitting image of yourself, believing every crazy conspiracy theory you believe. No evidence he’s a “doper” although that would mean nothing, most republicans are dopers, rush Limbaugh was the biggest heroin addict in recent history, Trump likes speed.
Mr Pelosi called him “friend” to calm him down, not because he was his friend you tool.
Was a failed political assasination by the far right, with prodding from politicians for years up to the “fire Pelosi with a rifle” add on the day before the failed assassination.
Funny, every place your alternative facts were put up is down, not those my info came from. Derp

You just don’t like who you are and seeing yourself in the mirror disgusts you, so you came up with a story from your own life when your gay lover beat you up. It’s so incredibly stupid, and shows you are not a bit serious, just ranting and blaming anyone but terrorist maggots.

Only the completely insane like you believe everything in the universe is on their side at all times…. all truth, all facts, all ideas, all goodness, even god….but somehow you just keep losing constantly, bigly. Maybe it’s just you!

But to recap, you don’t get to ask questions until you answer one….and you can’t.

Meh, nudity for the sake of being naked. That video with the nudists and the clothes-gun-toting hunters made more of a statement. This is just a peepshow.

That's exactly what happens when you live in a nudist environment, after a while it's just naked people and it's not a big deal.>> ^Payback:

You know, it's odd, at about 2:22 I'm starting to think, this is kinda... meh... I mean, they're nice and and balanced and all, but not in any way sexy. She was sexier before Uncle Fester ripped her dress off.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Outside nudist colonies- body modesty is a prevalent trait for most adolescents - you can blame corrupting society - but it exists.>> ^Bidouleroux:

Being conscious of what? Only peer pressure from the non-naked outside world (which equates nudity with sex) makes teenagers insecure around naked people. Children of nudists generally don't grow up to be "conscious" of their and others' nakedness. When you've seen and have been seen by thousands of naked bodies, nakedness becomes a non-issue.
Also, Freud is pants.>> ^dag:
Why is everybody sexualizing this? Nudity around your kids is not a harmful thing. What most of the books say is when kids start being body conscious, that's when mom and dad need to put clothes on around the house. And I think I liked your first title better, BMG.

Being conscious of what? Only peer pressure from the non-naked outside world (which equates nudity with sex) makes teenagers insecure around naked people. Children of nudists generally don't grow up to be "conscious" of their and others' nakedness. When you've seen and have been seen by thousands of naked bodies, nakedness becomes a non-issue.

Also, Freud is pants.>> ^dag:

Why is everybody sexualizing this? Nudity around your kids is not a harmful thing. What most of the books say is when kids start being body conscious, that's when mom and dad need to put clothes on around the house. And I think I liked your first title better, BMG.

thats some prity tight dancing ,

I have more of an issue forcing kids to learn fixed ruteens and spend all there time doing structured shit , rather than this been sexual.

evan if the dance is overtly sexual , they rnt having sex , and from kids perspective its not doing annything , so long as it wasent sumone seting it up for there own sexual enjoyment and the motervatoins behind it were posative then there is no real issue .

for them to call this on clothing is pritty stupid , i mean with that argument its like saying all nudists are secual predators , and its in apropreat for people to be naked . (again it depends on the person who dressed them ups resoning and motivatoin)

granted the typ of clothing is cultraly asoceated with slutty stuff , but they r kids and not sluts , halaween costumes are asoceated with muder and deth , but kids rnt going to grow up to murder becuse of bing a muderer .

People should be far more concernd about kids protending to shoot eachother with toy guns , than this (and evan that is not evan realy an issue )

and then there second argument that , pedoes exsist so thats a resoin for them not to be dressed like that , well


1) whats wrong with pedoes lusting over this so long as they dont do annything to the kids and dont do annything that increoaches on minors there is no problem. Its like me banning statues becuse a % of the populatoin find them sexualy atractive .

2) just becuse sumone is a pedo dose not autimaticly make them a sadistic eval person that will end up abusing kids , this shouting PEDOPHILE atitude just makes the situatoin worse , need to get to the piont where if sumone is a pedophile and they activlly feal they want to abuse kids then they can get help , if sumone has abused kids then fine lock them up and do whats neeeded to protect socity but im sure there will be a percentage of pedoes that would and could get help and a more pragmatic apreach would reduce the likely hood of kids been abused.

I have never smoked (tobacco or anything else). I have never had any desire to smoke. I realize that I cannot really understand smoking from a smoker's mindset. I also realize that saying that "I wish nobody smoked" or "I wish cigarettes were never invented" doesn't really contribute anything.

But I hate smoking, and frankly that creates a large burden to overcome in any situation where I would develop any sort of direct interpersonal relationship with someone who smokes; whether that relationship is friendly, professional, romantic, or anything else. To me, cigarette smoke smells awful and even very small exposure can give me a headache or screw with my sinuses.

I don't want to interfere with other people's right to smoke at their own home or in private businesses that choose to allow it (bars, restaurants, whatever) -- or at least, I can accept that while I might personally be pleased if smoking was universally banned, I wouldn't want to set that sort of precedent for the whims of "some" being enforced on "all". But I will tend to personally avoid any location that allows smoking whenever possible, and I will tend to avoid people that smell of smoke much the same way (no great loss from your perspective, I am sure).

Just as a final thought, I'd suggest that smokers shouldn't take offense on a personal level to attitudes similar to mine. I don't hate you. I do hate smoking. I would prefer if you didn't smoke. You'd probably prefer me to be a female nudist with large breasts, or at least someone without an "attitude" about smoking. Neither of us is going to be magically granted our preference.

Nudists + Anna Paquin = Must See TV.

Aren't you a dear. Thanks a lot

In reply to this comment by JAPR:
*quality!

That's just ... I'm out of words, actually. Imagine the Walmart employee had found vacation pictures taken at a nudist beach; you'd have Homeland Security smashing your door before breakfast.

This video has been declared a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by rasch187.

*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Family-Guy-the-nudists

Visit, dinner, nudists.. Yes!, i see it now, the perfect family guy joke. Good work manatees.

When I read that 33% over 50 years I was surprised.

Then I found this:
People who visit this site are likely to visit these sites as well:
cracked.com I thought you were older?
supermodellinks.com Hehe, that's a little strange?
topxml.com Web development, how progressive!
thepeopleimage.com "Thousands of artistic pictures of teens and preteens" Well, maybe you're artsy
babble.com I KNEW you were mature.
militaryphotos.net Brings back memories, doesn't it?
****nudism.net So maybe videosift is a collection of nudists?
rka**.com Adult content?
heaven-******.com More adult content?
**-models.com ...
*******supermodels.com World view, crushed.
**dir.com Anger, setting in.
Those censored are so because they were rated badly on WOT - Web of Trust.

Foxnews.com and MSN.com are "catering to a more educated group". Enuff said.

I find it funny he refers to only northern european countries when he's talking about differences with the "Union of the Mediterranean". And by the way, there are a lot more nudist beaches along the mediterranean coast than there are in scandinavia.