#1 not fake.. both were going in the same direction at the same speed, it is just the truck made a great recovery and the game isn't to picky about the location of both vehicles to latch the trailer back on.

#2 does not need a lot of retakes.. the guy was simply pulling stunt jumps with a tractor trailer and this happened. You only need to do it once and capturing the stunts in game is super easy (it was designed to always be recording game data on a loop, so anything happens you just hit a key to close and save the loop).

#1 Its not fake.
#2 this is probably one of the first couple of full runs, no one but the home owners even know about it.
#3 It is not actually that difficult. The kits to synchronize these lights have been out for a decade now. In a case like this I would;

a) Get permission to handle everyones lights for the year.
b) Using the same kit, I wouldn't get too fancy, gutter icicles, trees, garage outlines, not much more for each house.
c) only need to make one routine, this routine can then be loaded into all houses with only the need to tweak the strands of lights used in each group.
e) syncing would be no problem with an internet aware kit that synchs its internal clock online.

The place turns into kind of a strobe mess because there are not many types of light groups to alternate between, but that can wait for next year. Great effort.

The rock it is on is like, within a couple feet of the surface at low tide.

FUN FACT: This is the same lighthouse that everyone has seen, with the monster wave crashing around the keeper standing in the doorway. Which was a real photo btw, not faked in any way.

http://beingsakin.wordpress.com/2011/09/08/on-reality-iv/

The most fucked up thing here is that, probably, no one familiar with the US Justice system would bat an eye thinking it was fake (it's not fake, it's just so insane that most *sane* people would question such a ridiculous scenario).

How can we make the rule of law also fair? It's so self-defeating.

No nation would want law to be horribly alienating to the majority of the populace, but in making it so based in logic (which I completely agree with, with our current situation being the only example I don't), it becomes such a nuanced system it defeats the purpose of equality in court.

Again, Wikipedia is not a good science class.
uniformitarianism is an absolutist proposition, easily and quickly proven false...and not only by catastrophe. You admit this, then claim it's still correct and still the base. WHAT?!?
Your "cowboy" is not a fossil, it's calcified at best, if not faked. Ever hear of hard water? That they try to play it off as a fossil only shows their blatant disingenuousness and the gullibility of those that want/need their under-educated opinion to be truth.
The point of finding the same sediment at the same level world wide would be to prove a world wide flood, not disprove dating methods. (WHAT are you talking about, just changing the subject in hopes I'll jump with you?!?)
I cite the ridiculousness and non-scientific basis for your argument(s) as reason to not watch another video, you didn't read closely. I don't have another 1/2 hour to give to the willfully misinformed's silly propaganda.

Apart from the fact that larger planes than that routinely do. Just because larger aircraft are not normally manoeuvred so violently does not mean they are incapable.

Plus that's a relatively small plane in extreme crosswinds. I assure you as a lifetime plane nut that's not fake, just mad p1lot1ng sk1llz! (I would assume they are very low on fuel etc. as normally one would never attempt a landing in conditions that bad)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7P9OAng32F0

Definitely not fake accents.

it's not fake she's not shy because she is a porn star and mostly porn stars do not wear bras and her harness wasn't put on

not fake at all

But it didn't collapse! That's not Battlefield damage, that's Call of Duty.

In the puddle test, the water is very still after the camera change when it's dropped in. Looks like they at least edited together different takes, assuming it's not fake (which would be incredibly pointless).

No - you can clearly see that the plane of sharpness and the depth of field give the illusion away (and confirm that the video is not fake) - especially for the baseball at 0:50-1:00 - it is clear that this is an image and not a 3D object. Just like you clearly can see if the glasses are real or not in the final shot.
Quite obvious that the shots with the changing focus aren't faked, especially if you're used to low DoF photography with fast lenses. The plane of sharpness do not follow the 3D shapes when focusing back and forth - the plane follows the still image on the table.

And of course they adjusted the exposure during the shot! They go back and forth from large apertures to small apertures - they had to change the shutter time and/or ISO.

You can also tell that the deepest shadows on the images never get quite dark enough - look at the shadow underneath the globe in the opening shot, versus the deeper blacks on the typewriter and sunglasses. This is easily seen in all the shots, if you know what to look for.
And, stuff like the edges of the papers under the glasses in the final shot - real objects do not have chromatic aberration with a red tint towards the corner of the image and a blue tint towards the centre of the image.

Nope - real.
Of course it isn't one take, but they did not use editing trickery - they do not swap out 3D objects for 2D ones or vice versa.

No. This is not faked.

not fake at all... its just that the Lithuanian gravity works a bit different...

I was reading this yesterday and shaking my head. Sadly this is not fake or parody :

http://publicshaming.tumblr.com/post/47585129005/tensions-are-high-between-north-korea-and-the