search results matching tag: lesbian
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
| Videos (198) | Sift Talk (9) | Blogs (12) | Comments (687) |
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
| Videos (198) | Sift Talk (9) | Blogs (12) | Comments (687) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Why Home Ownership is Actually a Terrible Investment
PaybackThis is also the first time I'm not upvoting one of these. I upvote for the ones I agree with, I upvote the ones I vehemently DISagree with. I won't upvote one they threw together in 20 minutes to make a bunch of gay and lesbian jokes with.
Mr. D - Kindergarten Vocabulary
JustSaying"You can never be a lesbian."
Poppycock! Follow your dreams! Everything is possible when you truly believe in yourself!
Mr. D - Kindergarten Vocabulary
ant*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Kindergarten-Vocabulary-What-is-a-lesbian
Why Do Women Live Longer Than Men?
PaybackI read somewhere lesbians tend to have shorter lifespans than hetero women, so it's probably living WITH women that causes "the other side" to just give up sooner.
Texas Representative Warns of Gay Space Colony
nanrodIf I was designing a space ark for the perpetuation of the human race and as much of Earth's biodiversity as possible, I would go with as large seed bank as possible, frozen embryos and sperm and wherever possible female animals only. And since it would not make sense to waste payload on unnecessary males the crew would need to be female. In terms of perpetuating humanity the most valuable resource would be wombs. And since the first generation colonists would be female then it would make sense for their mental health to recruit primarily lesbians.
The Worst Intersection in West LA
Payback"What's that? A lowrider Subaru. Must be driven by an overweight lesbian."
lmao.
NOFX: Creeping Out Sara
eric3579I was backstage at a festival in Germany
talking to a cute fair skinned brunette
I asked her if she wanted to have a beer and if she liked our set
I noticed that her hair was longer in the back
I figure that’s cuz she’s Canadian
That’s why I was surprised when she told me she was fully lesbian
That's when I realized it was Sara, or maybe it was Tegan
I'm pretty sure that it was Sara
Cause Johnny Sampson said she was the cooler one
I told her I was a big fan of her band
She asked me if I had a favorite song
I admitted that I'd never actually heard them, but I like k.d. lang
I told her this Jew knows about the Juno’s
And how they got robbed three times in a row
And then I asked her if she knew of anyone who was selling pills or blow
That's when I creeped out Sara or maybe I just pissed her off
When I asked her if her sister and her had ever had a threesome?
Where they both ganged up one girl, a forgy or a fivesome?
Do they think strap-ons are groovy, and had they ever seen the movie
Bound and did they like Jennifer Tilly, did they like Jennifer Tilly?
Sara said she preferred Gina Gershon, Angelina Jolie
In the Gia movie that was on HBO
And “If These Walls Could Talk” made Tegan cry a lot
After that I forgot what she said
That's the problem with Diazepam, so many things I don't remember
But I've got a sinking feeling, it's not that I'm a clairvoyant
But I think that I creeped out Sara, I was creeping out on Sara
I hope it wasn't Tegan, cuz Matt Skiba said she is the cooler one
Clueless Gamer "Overwatch" With Peter Dinklage & Lena Headey
00Scud00 says...Totally lost it at the Battle of the Shiny Asses. The combination of moans and gunfire makes it sound like lesbian pornstar day at the local gun range.
This Dildo Tried To Ban Dildos
MordhausFunny thing was, the only thing they targeted were dildos. I remember going to a adult store, when the law was still in effect, and there were tons of male toys for masturbation. The law stated both were illegal, but they only ever went after the female ones.
The only reason they were against the dildos was because they thought it would prevent lesbians from having satisfactory sex and prevent women from wanting to service their husbands.
Meanwhile, not that I'm complaining, I could own all the guns I wanted and resell them to whomever I wished.
Doctor Strange Teaser Trailer
poolcleanerJessica Jones is Matrix lite for lesbians who don't want hard scifi.
Daredevil is Batman for new yorkers who don't like fake cities.
Guardians of the Galaxy is a 1970s scifi fantasy medley.
Oh look, the sequel to inception!
I love the penis.
MordhausWho doesn't?
Lesbians, for the most part, I would think.
The surfer not considered hot enough for sponsorship
ChaosEngine@newtboy yeah, but that ad was specifically for a surf competition that Roxy was sponsoring. It took a lot of flack at the time for being demeaning to women surfers and inspired this awesome parody.
) should be paid. And before that, we should make sure that children have enough to eat, and stop wars and fix climate change and so on and so on.
)
@Babymech of course teachers and civil rights activists (and most importantly software developers
I don't know how many times I've said this, but just because problem A is worse than problem B doesn't mean that problem B isn't a problem.
No-one tells teachers, activists, etc. that they're not hot enough to be paid (certainly not in software anyway
My issue is not that she's not sponsored, it's that she's not sponsored because she's not good looking enough.
I get why that is from a commercial sense. There's a definite expectation on female surfers to be attractive (probably because they tend to wear bikinis a lot). I mean, look at this. If you removed the one surf pic, it could be a generic modelling agency roster.
But that only goes on as long as we accept it. There's nothing wrong with attractive women modelling bikinis. I appreciate the female form as much as the next straight guy/lesbian. But it sucks when a young girl with great talent, looks at that list and thinks that looks are more important than ability in surfing.
why is the media ignoring the sanders campaign?
LawdeedawHere, let me see if you agree.
Basically, there were three camps around Ron Paul.
1st was the conservative camp. 2nd was the liberal camp. 3rd was the everyone who voted for Paul camp.
In the 1st one people hated Paul because he didn't follow their platform. He didn't want to ban abortion at the level of the federal government, he didn't want to make gay marriage illegal with a broad pen stroke and he wasn't keen on telling people they could drink but not smoke pot. He believed the states should decide.
In other words, this camp was solely based on their own selfish beliefs. Me me me, greed greed greed. Give me. Fuck the honest guy.
In the second camp people hated Paul because he didn't follow their platform. He didn't want federal government handouts, one-sized fits-all approach to education or legalization of gay marriage or abortion at the federal level. He believed states should decide.
In other words, this camp was solely based on their own selfish beliefs. Me me me, greed greed greed. Give me. Fuck the honest guy.
Then there was the 3rd camp. They valued him as a candidate, and said fuck the platform. Platform voting has been destroying our country and polarizing our nation since the beginning.
What makes me so pissed is that the first 2 camps believe they were doing the right thing. Like a rapist in India trying to make a lesbian straight...yeah, great morals there guys...these delusional whack jobs disgust me. Yeah, it is fine to vote against Ron Paul without being labeled as such, so long as you 100% believed your candidate was morally superior to Paul. And as long as that belief had nothing to do with platform...
Or am I just being a prick?
@ChaosEngine
if you are referring to the established political class,the pundit class and those with relative power and influence i would agree with your assertions.
which is pretty much what i am talking about.
if you look how ron paul was being treated by his own party and compare that treatment to sanders by the DNC,there are some glaring similarities.
while both paul and sanders have differing politics,they did align in a few areas i.e: audit the fed,citizens united,money in politics and restructuring the military to name a few.
they both had/have immensely popular grassroots support.ron paul garnering 20 million in small donations and sanders broke that record with 30 million.
they both held large rallies with high attendance.
they both had a populist flavor that appealed to their own political base.challenging the current corrupt power structures.
and they both have/had experienced a weird media blackout,even though they were/are incredibly popular with the voters.
now we can question WHY that is,but i don't think it too much a stretch to come to the conclusion that both candidates challenged the current power structures that dictate this countries dysfunctional and corrupt political system.add to that mix a paid propaganda pundit class that never challenges the current narrative,all put on display on corporate media which is owned by what? 5-6 entities? who just happen to be the biggest lobbyists in this country?
nader experienced pretty much the exact same treatment from the DNC in regards to media exposure and it went even further in his case with him being outright denied to some debates,or made to jump through almost insurmountable dictates to even get ON the debates.
so when i assert this is a well crafted and intentional practice by the parties,i do so with precedent.
because all three,nader,paul and sanders all had/have massive public support from the voters,but not their respective parties.
so when ron paul started to become a real thorn in the RNC,who did not want him anywhere near the nomination.they changed the tactic from ignoring or downplaying pauls message..to creating the "kook" myth.this was from his own party!!
nader received similar treatment,though in a different context.the establishment as a whole came out against him.
so what can we assume,based on previous tactics from these political parties in regards to sanders?when they can no longer ignore his popularity? his grassroots campaign donations? his rally attendances?
there will soon come a time when they can no longer ignore sanders and his grassroots success,and they will respond the exact same way they did with nader and paul.they will concoct a narrative that plays on peoples fears and biases and begin to portray sanders as an anti-capitalist "kook".that somehow him being a democratic socialist means the end of our civilization.just the word "socialist' makes many a republican wet their panties.
could i be wrong?
oh please god let me be wrong.
i happen to like much of what sanders is promoting,not everything,i have issues with some of what he proposes,but over-all i dig not only what he is saying but how he is going about conveying his message.
there is one huge problem if sanders gets the nod,and that is the support you mentioned.he has almost none in the legislature.which will make much of what he is trying to change in washington damn near impossible.
which will create it own political mess and just create fodder for the pundit class to ineffectually pontificate on,just so they can have a job.
i think it would be such a great thing for this country if sanders got the nomination,but the establishment has already made its intentions clear:they dont want sanders,they want hillary.the establishment does not play by the rules nor do they play nice.
playing by the rules and being decent is for the peasant class.
hope i am wrong.
i hope that every single point i made will never occur.
i hope that sanders gets the nod and things may change,because this country needs a fucking enema.
but my cynicism really struggles with that kind of hopeful optimism.
Lesbians Touch a Penis for the First Time. Yikes.
VoodooVthis is...something people want to see?
I don't get it. is this part of the not so secret delusion that some people seem to have that they will convert a lesbian if they're with the right guy or something?
woman destroys third wave feminism in 3 minutes
Babymech says...There are BLM activists who make inflammatory comments about white people (oh no whatever shall we do) and there are feminists who make inflammatory comments about men (oh no whatever shall we do). I posit, for your reasoned consideration:
Also, please don't say that men suffer from most or all of the opression that women suffer, as much or to a greater degree, without sources. I'll give you some examples of what you could have done:
See, that's what you could have done.
Given the actual facts I have a hard time seeing how anyone has 'destroyed' feminism.
Well, if a majority of the 'black lives matter' people normally chanted 'death to whitey', 'all white people are rapists', 'Anyone who's skin is not brown is evil', etc, especially if they then used their group to harass and quash any dissent, I don't think they would get much support either.
So the fact that men suffer from most, if not all of the issues 'feminists' claim are forced on them solely BY men, almost to the same extent, or to GREATER extents while being completely ignored and actually blamed IS a reasonable argument against today's brand of anti male 'feminism'.
It is not a reasonable argument against equality...but that's no longer what 'feminism' is about.