search results matching tag: how it should have ended

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.013 seconds

    Videos (178)     Sift Talk (0)     Blogs (17)     Comments (106)   

Trump posts "60 Minute" interview before it airs

newtboy says...

Lol.
Stahl- "Are you ready for some tough questions?"
Trump- "No."

Most honest answer ever given by president low T. It should have ended right there.

Snowflake. Run and hide. The questions are going to be one hell of a lot tougher in court, little Donny.

How SOLO A Star Wars Story Should Have Ended

Ocean's Over 40 Trailer

Ocean's Over 40 Trailer

ant (Member Profile)

How Star Wars The Last Jedi Should Have Ended

newtboy says...

I thought it should have ended with ewoks dancing in the redwoods (if not one movie earlier)...because the entire series jumped the shark after that to me.
Imo, #4-6 (episode 1-3) were too geared for kids and were visually spectacular but devoid of substance, #7 &8 were all about member berries.

Police Are Different In Norway

ant (Member Profile)

Zifnab (Member Profile)

Greatest Olympic Gold Medal Win Ever

poolcleaner says...

It should have ended like On The Beach. Scuttle your subs and take your damn suicide pills, Australia!

Not every scenario ends well for those that avoid open hostilities.

How Star Wars The Force Awakens Should Have Ended

ant (Member Profile)

Why Cats Sprint Out of the Room for No Apparent Reason

how climate change deniers sound to normal people

newtboy says...

The point of the video.

I've used well over 100 condoms, and never once had a failure, a pregnancy, or an STD. Then again, I not only read the instructions, I was also shown how to use them, and I don't try to use expired or damaged condoms, or store them in heat and sun, or any of the other things people often do wrong with them....so you're wrong, they are not only >98% effective in labs...they have been 100% effective in my experience, for instance, which is >98%, and not in a lab. ;-)

It is not a lazy abandonment of people who disagree with me, it's a long over due abandonment of people who disagree with reality and science (honestly or not) usually in order to be a roadblock for action.
The skeptics have had their hearings, time and time again. At some point, you must admit that those still 'skeptical' either pick and choose/misinterpret information that allows that mindset, are knowingly lying for some gain, or are completely ignorant and only listening to those that pick and choose information or are liars, and they're doing so willfully. Because further 'debate' is consistently at the expense of any overdue mitigating action, and action is imperative for long term survival, the time for more 'listening' to deniers should have ended decades ago.
Examining theories with a critical eye and being a denier are not the same thing by far. Deniers examine theories with a pre-conception, and if it's not agreed with, they discard the theory, then figure out a reason why.
Deniers aren't 'skeptics', they're conspiracy theorists. The only way their argument stands up is if they can convince you that the overwhelming majority of scientists are actually not scientists, but are really just liars that somehow stand to make a fortune if they convince people of the big lie....to most people that's just nuts....and to reasonable people it's long past time to stop giving the nuts equal time and consideration.

harlequinn said:

And which point and answer would that be? It's pretty clear you're wrong. You're moving into delusional territory.

Health happens to be my area. Condoms are only >98% effective in lab settings. My numbers are from longitudinal studies. In other words, it reflects the average user's results. They are not from anti-sex education organisations. Go look them up - there are lots of studies. Interestingly condom's have similar rates (80% to 90%) of stopping HIV transmission for exactly the same reasons. Even lower in some studies.

Don't be a snob. Education is the path forward. Your lazy abandonment of people because they disagreed with you is stone age thinking.

Anthony Giddens addresses sceptics in his book "The Politics of Climate Change": "Yet the sceptics do deserve and must receive a hearing. Scepticism is the life-blood of science and just as important in policy-making. It is right that whatever claims are made about climate change and its consequences are examined with a critical, even hostile, eye and in a continuing fashion."

Note: Anthony Giddens is very much not a sceptic and his book is an analysis of how to better achieve real action on climate change.

Cat Poops on Mole



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon