Japanese game shows are the best!

Well, this is not a reality tv but a game show, so...?

Here's the follow up video.
http://videosift.com/video/Will-Grumpy-Cat-Play-With-It-Friskies-reg-Game-Show-for-Cats

What I find to be the most amazing thing with this video is how it so masterfully shows the difference in culture between Japan and say the UK or the US. If this had been on say X-factor he would have gotten 3 red X in the first 20 seconds. They really have a completely different outlook on mastery of skills. That is what makes the Japanese talent shows and game shows so much better.

Russian dashcams are the new Japanese game shows.

there was an American game show called Supermarket Sweep, which had a similar premise of grabbing as much merchandise as you can fit into your cart as you race around the store during the time allotted.
I think the more questions you got right, the more time was on the clock.

Looks like something copied from Japanese game shows.

You forgot speechwriter and lawyer for Presidents Nixon and Ford.>> ^Payback:

Ben Stein.
Stand Up Comic.
Comedic Movie Bit Player.
Game Show Host.
Economist?
Say what?
Jerry Seinfeld
Stand Up Comic.
TV Personality.
Billionaire.
Dental Assistant?

Ben Stein.

Stand Up Comic.
Comedic Movie Bit Player.
Game Show Host.
Economist?

Say what?

Jerry Seinfeld

Stand Up Comic.
TV Personality.
Billionaire.
Dental Assistant?

>> ^critical_d:

How about Wink Martindale and Gene Rayburn?


Game show host names actually do play in -- they will replace the classic bronze, silver, gold, ruby, diamond, crown progression in videosift 5.0. Details are still slim but I understand as a Diamond I will become a "Richard Dawson"

>> ^brycewi19:

Don't laugh, Penisdump is a serious medical condition. It's no laughing matter.


I just had a penis dump and it wasn't painful at all. In fact, it was quite uplifting and I recommend it to all those with penises.

" "Explicit sexual content" is defined on VideoSift as gratuitous nudity of a sexual nature lacking any reasonable artistic and educational merit, implying its sole intent is to cause sexual arousal." -- Da rules.

We're not prudes here, so 4 of those don't count of lack of proper nudity, and Girl in a Toyota is funny and has a story. Britta crosses the line and should also be * discussed. If it had been discussed and approved already, you'd have a point.>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^messenger:
Two aren't precedent because they have substance beyond the sexuality, and the third one is dead. The only focus of this piece is naked hot chicks. The policy is in place to keep single-purpose fap material elsewhere. I mean, is this enjoyable for any other reason?
And there's precedent for this too. There was a video with two or three hot topless women having a snowball fight. It was considered unfit for the Sift. (I searched now but couldn't find it again.) Even actual porn has been accepted, because it was a funny parody. This is nothing but boobs. I like that line to be clear.
They all work for me, but that's neither here nor there.
On the point of "single-purpose fap material"...
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Huh-Title-Just-a-minute
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Girl-in-a-To
yota-Supra-The-full-uncensored-version-in-HD
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Britta-from-Community-goe
s-topless-in-Choke
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Kate-Upton-The-Many-Talents
-of-Kate-Upton
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Hot-Girl-Dancing-Around-in-H
er-Underwear
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/French-game-shows-B
ETTER-than-Japanese-game-shows
I can't call this video enjoyable for any reason but that's also neither here nor there, IMO.
I like the line to be clear as well, but it never is. It depends who submits, who complains, what day it is, which way the wind is blowing, etc. I just can't justifiably call this pornographic; certainly no more so than any of those accepted videos above.

>> ^messenger:

Two aren't precedent because they have substance beyond the sexuality, and the third one is dead. The only focus of this piece is naked hot chicks. The policy is in place to keep single-purpose fap material elsewhere. I mean, is this enjoyable for any other reason?
And there's precedent for this too. There was a video with two or three hot topless women having a snowball fight. It was considered unfit for the Sift. (I searched now but couldn't find it again.) Even actual porn has been accepted, because it was a funny parody. This is nothing but boobs. I like that line to be clear.

They all work for me, but that's neither here nor there.

On the point of "single-purpose fap material"...
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Huh-Title-Just-a-minute
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Girl-in-a-Toyota-Supra-The-full-uncensored-version-in-HD
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Britta-from-Community-goes-topless-in-Choke
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Kate-Upton-The-Many-Talents-of-Kate-Upton
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Hot-Girl-Dancing-Around-in-Her-Underwear
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/French-game-shows-BETTER-than-Japanese-game-shows

I can't call this video enjoyable for any reason but that's also neither here nor there, IMO.

I like the line to be clear as well, but it never is. It depends who submits, who complains, what day it is, which way the wind is blowing, etc. I just can't justifiably call this pornographic; certainly no more so than any of those accepted videos above.

>> ^fritzo9602:

Not real. This is from a comedy sketch.


Either that, or the female presenter dyed her hair WAY dark.

>> ^fritzo9602:

Not real. This is from a comedy sketch.


Not real? This is from the Australian version of Countdown, called Letters and Numbers.