Holy crap. My family and I did a Euro vacation a few years ago and we stayed in the town of Grindelwald while we were in Switzerland. I think we rode the same trail as in the video in the summer, just on what were called trottibikes; basically giant scooters. It was scary and fun as hell.

https://www.jungfrau.ch/en-gb/grindelwaldfirst/trottibike-scooter/

Happy Birthday, Janine! Hope your day was fun as hell!

If you can manage to get a good group of folks together, most pen and paper RPG's are fun as hell. People that have grown up used to letting computers and consoles do the imagining for them don't really seem to get how fun it is to use their own minds to create worlds to play in.

Of course, on the flip side, if you have a bad group it can sour you on the experience for quite some time.

the thrill of the hunt. It's fun, not only does it provide food, it's exhilarating. Stalking the target is the most fun style of hunting large game, as you have to stay down wind, stay quiet, and get close enough for a good shot.

it is "getting off" so to speak. The adrenaline is pumping, it even has a name you can google "Buck Fever" every hunter gets it. "Buck Fever" causes a lot of missed shots, the heart races, adrenaline pumps and you wind up missing or spooking them. But hunting is a ton of fun, if it weren't my kids wouldn't even be interested in it either. Not only does it provide cheap and plentiful food for family, which otherwise I would probably need food stamps to afford meat for family of 4, it's also fun, entertaining, and constantly trying to get better.

Similar to how fps gamers get addicted to keep getting better scores and "kill streaks" same for hunting, I hate missing a flock of quail, I love when we flush a flock of 5 or 6 quail and we can get them all, which rarely happens, usually 2 or 3 are dropped until next flush.

if hunting was not fun, there would be no point, just buy from store...
but it serves a purpose and it's fun as hell.

Jeepers, I dunno what kind of trailer you were expecting when it comes to a robot vs kaiju film. Physics? Really? I think this looks fun as hell and although everything Del Toro touches isn't gold, I haven't seen a film by him yet that I found to be complete and utter garbage.

I dragged a computer from my neighbors garbage when I was 8 years old. A 286 with a monochrome monitor. I learnt to program in BASIC then HTML then Java then turning then C then action script.
shits fun as hell.

And I agree with them. I think Jesus was saying pretty bluntly: "It's fucking impossible for rich people to go to heaven... period."


That site you link also clarifies that:

...and Homo neanderthalensis were simply racial variants of modern humans and, like all humans, were descended from Adam and Eve.


But despite the fact that these nutbars said it, it's true there's no historical evidence for the gate in question (or at least there wasn't last time I looked). However, there's lots of things about life at that time that we don't have any real evidence for, and the parable makes more sense (to me at least) interpreted that way.

It also doesn't jive well with the rest of the Bible for rich people to be unilaterally condemned - there's plenty of biblical people who receive riches as a reward for righteousness. That wouldn't be much of a reward if those riches dragged them down to Hell (haha, here's your stuff back Job, have fun in Hell!).

Ok, I know Petaluma is fun as hell to say and all, but you coulda spared two characters somewhere for a CA in the title so those of us who don't know, would know, Petaluma is in California.

>> ^A10anis:

Answer me one question. Given the luck and privilege of his life, how many of you, given the same good fortune, could not do what he does? Given the time and money, would you not indulge in fun pursuits? Hell, i'd love to learn how to fly a jet or helicopter. I'd love the fame to be invited to drive an F1 car.This is not envy talking, it is reality. Best of luck to him. But, please, don't tell me he is special. Of course his fans will say he is supremely talented..Hmm, ok.


If I had his money, I'd buy one of these

Answer me one question. Given the luck and privilege of his life, how many of you, given the same good fortune, could not do what he does? Given the time and money, would you not indulge in fun pursuits? Hell, i'd love to learn how to fly a jet or helicopter. I'd love the fame to be invited to drive an F1 car.This is not envy talking, it is reality. Best of luck to him. But, please, don't tell me he is special. Of course his fans will say he is supremely talented..Hmm, ok.

>> ^gwiz665:

Hehe, fair enough, free will doesn't exist, technically, but Christianity (and everyday life) assumes it does.
Can people in heaven never change their minds? Are they locked in a stasis? How come evil can exist here on earth but not in heaven? Is it not even a possibility that it could spring up in heaven? Or is it possible but just doesn't happen?
Are people selected on actions they might take in the future or on stuff they have already done? What about being already forgiven because of jesus or confessional or whatever way you are absolved of your sins? Is that suddenly not enough anyway?
Heaven cannot exist within logic. The only possible heaven that could exist, can't have people in it anyway, because as soon as it has people, it's no longer "heaven".
Free will exists, but it's deterministic.

Well now you're on safer ground.

Except, if free will is deterministic, and God is omniscient, then he knows who will eventually change their minds and choose evil. They go to hell. Yes, that means heaven is probably a pretty empty place, and not so fun, while hell is a seriously happenin' place filled with people who mostly do right, but occasionally do wrong...

Mostly my issue with heaven is that it perpetuates the idea that you can sort people into black and white categories of good and evil. Judging the morality of a single act taken by a person is a dizzying challenge in all but the most clear-cut cases. To judge a person in their entirety is not something people really should feel is within their capability. Even if you hypothesize that there's some supreme, invisible being doing the judging, you really have to question why such judgments are necessary, given how totally murky the human moral existence really is. I mean for God's sake, we can only keep living if we kill and eat massive numbers of other living organisms...how is that moral?!

But I don't really think there's a simple logical fault with the definition of heaven. Mostly there's just no evidence to believe that any of it exists, or functions based on the rules in the Bible(s) or elsewhere.

>> ^shuac:

It can't be as bad as Kick-Ass. That's an impossibility.


Umm what was wrong with Kick-Ass? I thought it was fun as hell.

Gotta love that scene with all the reapers in the shot.

My worry about ME3 is that since ME2 distracted us with the collectors instead of the ACTUAL reaper threat, that they're going to have to pull a Deus ex Machina out of their butt to save us from the reapers in the end.

Yes, I know the collectors were pretty much created by the Reapers and they were making that new hybrid Reaper, but the whole thing, to me, seemed like such a distraction from the real threat.

ME2 was fun, but I agree with XXovercastXX and MarineGunrock, They took some of the best parts of ME1 and ripped them right out. the thermal clip system was dumb as hell. As MG said, the inventory needed fixing, not elimination.

I cant believe someone actually LIKED probe scanning. Yes driving the Mako around a lifeless planet was sometimes tedious, but it was also fun as hell sometimes too.

You actually made me second guess myself. There were several wild west themed shooters around that time so I went and confirmed that I was remembering the right game.

The quickdraw minigame kinda reminds me of VATS from FO3 in that it was pretty sweet at first, but faded quickly. After doing it a few times the challenge was gone and it just became another repetitive motion to go through.

>> ^Shepppard:

Perhaps you and I played completely different games, but I loved the original red dead. The storyline mechanics of actual "Draw" fights made that game fun as hell, and the dead eye meter was fun, too.
One of the reasons I was stupidly excited for RDR was because they brought those back, and I was not disappointed.

>> ^xxovercastxx:

I played Red Dead Revolver for a couple hours when it was new and I'm not sure why. It's definitely up there as one of the worst games I've ever played, and that was obvious within the first 10 minutes, but I think I was hoping for it to suddenly improve.
Of course Green Spleen Submarine could still be a good game despite it's terribad heritage and, as someone said, it's getting great reviews, but Revolver got pretty good reviews too so I don't really put any faith in that.


Perhaps you and I played completely different games, but I loved the original red dead. The storyline mechanics of actual "Draw" fights made that game fun as hell, and the dead eye meter was fun, too.

One of the reasons I was stupidly excited for RDR was because they brought those back, and I was not disappointed.