What does this clip have to do with a frothy mixture of lube and feces?

I don't want "The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex." to be our president

So stupid. So frothy.

Man, what a frothy mix'o shit.

so i hadnt even HEARD santorum used.....ever. had no idea it was even a word. and like all monkeys i had to look it up, and ya.....whatever shred of innocence i had left has been obliterated....frothy indeed =(

damn you internet!!

At first I refused to watch this--John Stossel sucks frothy santorum through a straw.

But, after reading the comments I watched it, and I'm glad I did.

Piss in the wind, normally, yes, but in this specific case, at the Sift, with the type of people in here who really cling to fact, it's worth it. I'm not angry when I say it. I fully believe that THIS place, as opposed to the rest of the net, can grasp the concept.

I could just as easily stop caring how many people believe it wrong. It's not like Savage doesn't deserve credit for it for all the work he put into it.>> ^bareboards2:

Frustrating, isn't it? I go through the same thought process.
Another annoying example....Al Gore is still credited with saying he "invented" the internet, which he didn't do.
Some things just get twisted and there is naught we can do about it.
Piss in the wind, is all.

>> ^messenger:
As I've mentioned elsewhere, and as Savage himself has said many times, he didn't create nor even suggest creating this new definition. It was his column's reader's idea to find a sexual definition for Santorum's name, and the "frothy mixture" definition was another reader's contribution to the contest. Savage provided the space, and promoted it through his website www.spreadingsantorum.com.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'rick santorum, stephen colbert, dan savage, anal discharge' to 'rick santorum, stephen colbert, dan savage, anal discharge, frothy mud, more popular' - edited by calvados

Frustrating, isn't it? I go through the same thought process.

Another annoying example....Al Gore is still credited with saying he "invented" the internet, which he didn't do.

Some things just get twisted and there is naught we can do about it.

Piss in the wind, is all.


>> ^messenger:

As I've mentioned elsewhere, and as Savage himself has said many times, he didn't create nor even suggest creating this new definition. It was his column's reader's idea to find a sexual definition for Santorum's name, and the "frothy mixture" definition was another reader's contribution to the contest. Savage provided the space, and promoted it through his website www.spreadingsantorum.com.

As I've mentioned elsewhere, and as Savage himself has said many times, he didn't create nor even suggest creating this new definition. It was his column's reader's idea to find a sexual definition for Santorum's name, and the "frothy mixture" definition was another reader's contribution to the contest. Savage provided the space, and promoted it through his website www.spreadingsantorum.com.

What a horrible, inconsiderate guest. The host invited the man into his home, provided him with a frothy beverage, some reading material and interesting conversation. Then the dude damn near assaults him, insults him and jets on out of there in righteous indignation. Pffft.

Alright, I'll explain.

Ever since Roe v. Wade in 1973 (that's the legal case that basically ratified women's right to choose here in the States), the religious right has worked itself into a froth. Each year they get more frothy than the last and now, they have a chance to pass SOME kind of legislation, ANY kind of legislation that pushes their agenda forward.

At the same time, marijuana legalization appears imminent, culminating in a very near-future ballot initiative in California. I believe that occurs this coming November, if I'm not mistaken?

So...given the zero sum nature of politics, it would not be unheard of for the powers that be to covertly murmur amongst each other that if we pass marijuana legalization, then we'll ban abortion too, just for balance: if the liberals get something (legal pot) then the conservatives must also get something (more babies because there aren't nearly enough of them).

What's my justification for such a wild claim? Nothing more than my bitter cynicism about how politics work. What tells me it works this way? All of recorded history tells me.

So this poll is asking you which you value more: legal weed or legal abortions? Because I really do not think we can have both. That simple, really.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

^@spoco2 - I checked my kettle once with a meat thermometer- and it looks to be just the right temp (80c) = after automatic shut-off. I'm not a frothy milk drinker, so it's not an issue for me, but yeah, you would probably need a frother.

I'm finding I like mine long macchiato style with extra hot water added and then just a dash of milk.