Dont usually like car wrecks but title in combination with the video made me laugh. *quality

I take offense at the assumptions you made here and on several other posts, assumptions you seem fine with that help to define your presence online-I come off as a terse, bitter asshole on certain offerings here often due to the slanted banter but mostly when my smug meter pegs the red too many times after reading smegma like,

"So they need skills like this to walk around and shoot up rapists?

"Knowing how to walk around and shoot stationary targets is not that useful in real world situation...unless you are walking through a school shooting up kids laying on the ground".

"you gun crazies"

"these delusional gun crazies"

"Did you get those stats from NRA's PR department?"

"Ok, i'll bite your troll bain"

Your comments on threads that take offense at the direction of Congress on this issue sound EXACTLY like the creature Feinstein as she clucks and embarrasses herself daily in these hearings regarding another ineffectual attempt to standardize worldwide, the availability of boomsticks of any kind to citizens anywhere-I have been watching the slow train-wreck of U.S. politics for 40 years with the help of the massive disinformation/indoctrination mechanism of the media machine.....it's offensive, as are those living in an insular and idyllic world of fantasy and delusion, not unlike yours.

Especially detest the smug, holier-than-thou bullshit tone (as I have stated hundreds of times before when someone crawled-up my ass on this site), and ESPECIALLY on issues of police vs. citizenry, firearms, and left vs. right (two meaningless labels that have nothing to do with the mechanism of how the game really works).

I am happy to remain a voice crying in the wilderness here but I won't take asshole or douchebag lying down- ...I am a very gracious, and reasonable person otherwise-

I promoted this video for Buck, a recent addition to the users here, because the issue is fundamentally connected to the reason the U.S. is still here and get's swept aside in favor of kitty-cats, Russian car wrecks, and people fucking themselves up....

Oh, and because I like the cut of Buck's jib-I regard ANY new user who actually embeds videos here, votes and comments who offers an alternative to the regular fare here a breath of fresh, fucking air-

You appear to me to be another person deluded by their own world view enough to use labels, stereotype (which you have obviously done with myself) cry racism, or employ a similar tactic when faced with common sense or reason colliding with your ideals. It's sophomoric and offensive and unimpressive.

Don't sweat it-If You creep-through my past comments I'm sure you'll find many examples of my own foot-in-mouth-Peace

"The rest of the page reads like it was written by a programmer (probably because it was)."

I was going to chime-in to make a similar point-The site would benefit greatly from a re-tooling from a marketing standpoint-The place has been online long enough to have attracted more regulars-Most of the tweaks initiated here come from the realm of the programmer(s), formula-over-function....

There's plenty of talent and appeal available on the site to tap into when you find it's soul-The preeminent users here, so tenured through charter or stamina can do a lot to encourage fringe participants to broaden the appeal of the community-

One user in particular whose submissions and personality added some quality weight to the place is Arvana.... His fare was mind-expansion² with never a mundane cat fart, car wreck with or without human injury, or unkind word for anyone. A few real pieces of amazing work have floated through here.,.,.

Oopsy doopsy.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Car-wreck-launches-car-through-the-air

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by bareboards2. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

>> ^Quboid:

>> ^Darkhand:
I agree
We should have a set of rules to abide by.
I mean if we banned murder then nobody would be able to commit murder anymore right?
Lets start there!

What are you saying? That feels like sarcasm, since murder is in fact banned yet still happens, but then what's your point? That murder shouldn't be illegal??


You shouldn't argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. Don't worry, everyone else here understands your point.

>> ^bamdrew:

eeek, check out the passenger side of the front windshield... possibly someone wearing a white shirt launched forward from the backseat


airbag

>> ^Darkhand:

I agree
We should have a set of rules to abide by.
I mean if we banned murder then nobody would be able to commit murder anymore right?
Lets start there!


What are you saying? That feels like sarcasm, since murder is in fact banned yet still happens, but then what's your point? That murder shouldn't be illegal??

I agree

We should have a set of rules to abide by.

I mean if we banned murder then nobody would be able to commit murder anymore right?

Lets start there!

>> ^Quboid:

>> ^Darkhand:
GOOD THING THE RED LIGHT CAMERAS WERE THERE TO STOP THIS!
What's that? Red Light Camera's don't reduce accidents? They are just another way for the government to rob us? Oh I didn't know.

http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal
That someone ran a red light doesn't tell us anything about whether or not red light cameras reduce accidents, just that it hasn't eliminated them.


>> ^Quboid:

>> ^Darkhand:
GOOD THING THE RED LIGHT CAMERAS WERE THERE TO STOP THIS!
What's that? Red Light Camera's don't reduce accidents? They are just another way for the government to rob us? Oh I didn't know.

http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal
That someone ran a red light doesn't tell us anything about whether or not red light cameras reduce accidents, just that it hasn't eliminated them.

>> ^Darkhand:

GOOD THING THE RED LIGHT CAMERAS WERE THERE TO STOP THIS!
What's that? Red Light Camera's don't reduce accidents? They are just another way for the government to rob us? Oh I didn't know.


http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal

That someone ran a red light doesn't tell us anything about whether or not red light cameras reduce accidents, just that it hasn't eliminated them.

>> ^bamdrew:

eeek, check out the passenger side of the front windshield... possibly someone wearing a white shirt launched forward from the backseat


look closer, i think that's actually the driver...

but hell, why wear a seatbelt if you're just going to be running red lights willy-nilly...

>> ^chingalera:

Was that Bruce Willis in the gold Cutlass??


good eye!

Thanks for your thoughtful reply. What scripture says that is everyone receives some kind of evidence that would lead that person to conclude that there is a God, or at the very least, push them enough in that direction to be led to Jesus Christ. It also says that rather than acknowledge it, some people suppress the truth God has revealed them because of sin. It is all too common that humans suppress the truth naturally and effortlessly when it reveals something which causes them discomfort.

Having received (supernatural) evidence that sufficiently proves to me that not only is there a God, but that His name is Jesus Christ, I have faith that all of this is true. I don't believe God is going to hold anyone accountable for revelation they did not receive. I have also spoken with many people who have been given such evidence, such as @A10anis, who was shown supernaturally that God spared Him in a car wreck, but still denies God and refuses to repent.

As far as the rules go, no Christian expects the unbeliever to obey them. We expect that you hate Gods rules and would avoid following them whenever possible, except where they match up with the general morality of the culture. The point isn't really about following the rules, when it comes to why you should accept Jesus Christ. The point is that everyone has broken these rules, and that come judgment day, God will find you guilty for breaking them unless you have repented and turned to the Savior for forgiveness. Jesus Christ came to bring reconciliation with God, and forgiveness for our sins, so we could have a meaningful and loving relationship with God. It is our sins that separate us from Him.

>> ^Sketch:

I think I see. So, the issue you have is not that the Bible says, "believe or burn". It is that you have "faith", or you want to believe, what scripture tells you, in respect to everyone receiving evidence for God. Furthermore, you believe that you have received this evidence, whatever it may be, and it was/is real and sufficient enough for you to accept it as truth. Therefore, it confirms your belief in what the scripture tells you. Perhaps you received what you perceive as the evidence first, which led to revelation, I don't know. Of course, you seem to accept that if you had rejected the evidence you were supposedly given, then you would burn in Hell. Which really is just restating what the video said, except that you are placing the blame on people for rejecting what you see, and the bible states, as clear evidence, and not placing the blame on the actual rule-set given for accepting this so-called evidence for revelation. I think it is the rule-set that people have a problem with, but from your perspective, the rules are divine and infallible, and so any eternal punishment is the fault of those who deny and disobey the rules.
I do not know what you consider to be this "evidence", and I'm sure there are many other 80 post threads about it, but I respectfully(?) disagree that anyone receives any credible "evidence" that is sufficient enough to warrant giving one's life over to a religion without there being some amount of willful self-delusion, and desire for it to be true (faith). And there's certainly not enough to justify religious folk requiring the rest of us to conform to religious rules. From our perspective, without evidence, there is no reason for us to believe that these rules are divine and good. As they are written they are just base and ugly. This, I think, is where we differ.

You think firefighters are just peering out the window of the firehouse, waiting for a fire? Or going from one car wreck to getting a cat out of a tree, then onto a fire?

Talk to one. You'll have all day to talk.

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

@doogle
I hope your house burns down. With you in it.
But at the last second.. one of these "ungrateful" FireFighters pulls your mostly burnt body from the wreckage.
The only disgusting things about this video are the State thievery and your dumbass comments. fuckin' troll

Most people don't even want to be millionaires, they just want to pay their bills, they just want to NOT go bankrupt if they have a major illness.

I wouldn't want to be a millionaire. I don't want to constantly worry about whether or not my friends are just trying to mooch off me or if that girl who appears to like me is a gold digger or not.

If it's envy to see that the millionaire doesn't have to worry about education expenses If it's envy to see a millionaire who gets sick not have to worry about their future because they can afford the medical bills. If it's envy to see a millionaire get in a car wreck that's not his fault and afford the repair bill...

...then fine, you can call it envy. They make it sound like the 99 percent is just envious of the tasteless bling they can afford or the ugly McMansions or the useless shit they buy just because they can and that's where they're dead wrong. It's not envy over the luxuries, it's envy that they don't have to worry about the NECESSITIES.