You're gonna hate me for making you watch this heheh
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUXveLdO-F4

Anyhow, thanks for the nice comment heheh




In reply to this comment by choggie:
upvote for the skiddo, these folks inna car-wreck(@train-crossing), and goddamn!!!!!

upvote for the skiddo, these folks inna car-wreck(@train-crossing), and goddamn!!!!!

"Normal sifting process"....Tha's rich!!
SDGundamX, the shitty thing is, that some folks learn more than others from consciousness-raising experiences....I say we sit back and hope it happens over and over until neuter or spay, takes the piss outta the either/or scenario.....

Point in fact, some people did not even have to watch it, at all, to have a solid take on it-that voyeur is able to be controlled, stimied, or killed altogether, and replaced with that which edifieth the spirit-Do you HAVE to turn your head when you drive past a car wreck? Do you HAVE to listen to bullshit before shoving it back up the ass came from?

Do you have to follow rules, if you are not breaking any is the real question-no one has presented evidence, and when the rule (Eris forbid) is made, there is no end to the pushing of the envelope-Now......Isn't there a tax to pay or a crosswalk to have to get to before you can get to the other side of the boulevard????

Dude...dude...DUDE! I can't get enough of these interviews from backwood bumpkins. It's a car wreck. I hope that's not how the world sees all Americans.

It's entertainment. Horrible and attractive to sheeple much like a freak show. Entertainment at the expense of the bereaved. Montel knows this, but hey, it sells or he wouldn't have her on there. People watch it like they crane their necks to see if anyone died at a big car wreck.

I approve of cults that practice mass ritual suicides. I'll take any situation where the sheep of humanity, that believe in magic instead of reason, willingly take their own lives, thus freeing up some space on our crowded planet.

Why wait for car wrecks and amateur "jackass" stunts to take out one at a time when we can do this effectively?

It's like a car wreck or a really ugly person. You can't help but stare.

You'd be surprised what runs through your head at crazy times. I almost died in a car wreck when my car started doing a 360 down a two lane bridge at 80mph - and all I thought about the whole time was "My insurance is going to skyrocket"

^Not even joking.

In reply to this comment by jimnms:
Ron Paul has a lot of good "common since" ideas about most things, but there are some things I don't agree with. He says he wants to get rid of social security and Medicare, but I haven't heard his plan for what's going to happen to all of the people who rely on social security and Medicare. Private insurance companies are not the answer, private insurance companies are a rip off. I'm all for a working national healthcare system, healthy citizens = a healthy nation.

Insurance companies only care about making money for their investors, not providing care for their customers. Insurance companies should not be telling doctors what they can or can not do. When I was seriously injured in a car wreck years ago, my insurance company would only pay for so many days of ICU, so when that was up, I was kicked out to a regular hospital before I was even stable. Then they only covered so many days in a hospital, and once again when that was up I was kicked out. I didn't have any say in the matter because I was still in and out of consciousness.

It wasn't just my insurance company either. The accident wasn't my fault, and at fault driver's insurance tried to weasel out of paying for anything. I had to get a lawyer and it took over a year just to get them to pay their share of the bills.

Then to add insult to injury (literally) when it came time to renew my policy, they denied me. Nobody should have to go through that just to get the medical care they need. I'm sure if the insurance companies had any more control than they do, they would have just let me die so they could save money.

I think government does stick it's nose in a lot of things where it doesn't belong, but healthcare for it's citizens isn't one of them.

Totally agree here. His platform is the war in Iraq and national security.

You'll notice when the moderator asks him about getting rid of the IRS, federal reserve, CIA, FBI, etc., he immediately refocuses the question on security only. That's because he knows his libertarian platform of privatizing everything and relying on the free market doesn't ring true to most people. Even if it does, though, I have not seen a plan by which he will take all bureaucracies private while avoiding the collapse of much our infrastructure.

This is what worries me most about Ron Paul -- people hear the Iraq stuff (which I personally agree with), but don't hear the equally important stuff about what he plans to do with the federal gov't (eliminate as much as possible).

So while this makes Paul a nice story, he is not a candidate I would support, because his "classical conservatism" is so extreme. My vote is still going to a Democrat, for better or for worse.

In reply to this comment by jimnms:
Ron Paul has a lot of good "common since" ideas about most things, but there are some things I don't agree with. He says he wants to get rid of social security and Medicare, but I haven't heard his plan for what's going to happen to all of the people who rely on social security and Medicare. Private insurance companies are not the answer, private insurance companies are a rip off. I'm all for a working national healthcare system, healthy citizens = a healthy nation.

Insurance companies only care about making money for their investors, not providing care for their customers. Insurance companies should not be telling doctors what they can or can not do. When I was seriously injured in a car wreck years ago, my insurance company would only pay for so many days of ICU, so when that was up, I was kicked out to a regular hospital before I was even stable. Then they only covered so many days in a hospital, and once again when that was up I was kicked out. I didn't have any say in the matter because I was still in and out of consciousness.

It wasn't just my insurance company either. The accident wasn't my fault, and at fault driver's insurance tried to weasel out of paying for anything. I had to get a lawyer and it took over a year just to get them to pay their share of the bills.

Then to add insult to injury (literally) when it came time to renew my policy, they denied me. Nobody should have to go through that just to get the medical care they need. I'm sure if the insurance companies had any more control than they do, they would have just let me die so they could save money.

I think government does stick it's nose in a lot of things where it doesn't belong, but healthcare for it's citizens isn't one of them.

Totally agree here. His platform is the war in Iraq and national security.

You'll notice when the moderator asks him about getting rid of the IRS, federal reserve, CIA, FBI, etc., he immediately refocuses the question on security. That's because he knows his libertarian platform of privatizing everything and relying the free market doesn't ring true to most people.

This is what worries me most about Ron Paul -- people hear the Iraq stuff (which I personally agree with), but don't here the equally important stuff about what he plans to do with the federal gov't (eliminate as much as possible).

So while this makes Paul a nice story, he is not a candidate I would support, because his classical conservatism is so extreme. My vote is still going to a Democrat, for better or for worse.

Ron Paul has a lot of good "common since" ideas about most things, but there are some things I don't agree with. He says he wants to get rid of social security and Medicare, but I haven't heard his plan for what's going to happen to all of the people who rely on social security and Medicare. Private insurance companies are not the answer, private insurance companies are a rip off. I'm all for a working national healthcare system, healthy citizens = a healthy nation.

Insurance companies only care about making money for their investors, not providing care for their customers. Insurance companies should not be telling doctors what they can or can not do. When I was seriously injured in a car wreck years ago, my insurance company would only pay for so many days of ICU, so when that was up, I was kicked out to a regular hospital before I was even stable. Then they only covered so many days in a hospital, and once again when that was up I was kicked out. I didn't have any say in the matter because I was still in and out of consciousness.

It wasn't just my insurance company either. The accident wasn't my fault, and at fault driver's insurance tried to weasel out of paying for anything. I had to get a lawyer and it took over a year just to get them to pay their share of the bills.

Then to add insult to injury (literally) when it came time to renew my policy, they denied me. Nobody should have to go through that just to get the medical care they need. I'm sure if the insurance companies had any more control than they do, they would have just let me die so they could save money.

I think government does stick it's nose in a lot of things where it doesn't belong, but healthcare for it's citizens isn't one of them.

the human-drama voyeur in the crowd may find it compelling, as would the detail in the title of the post, attract the flies.......lets all watch the car wreck, and follow the ambulance to the hospital, for some great, you-tube upload material...........bleghhh. So now we know some unlikely effects of, otherwise rudimentary aspects of physics-an arm can rip two legs off at 300 miles an hour:(

dunno man, looks like the cat was surrounded by idiots.....and he falls straight back and tags his skull on the floor, then his buddies stand there hapless........this qualifies for EinE but damn, it's also like watching a car wreck......would have been immediately down to at least check him out.....emt reflex, w/o ever having had training.....just experience....this is disturbing

"Over a lifetime of driving, your odds of dying in a car wreck are about 1 in 90, or 1 in 6,200 in any given year. On average, the death rate for driving a car is about four times higher per mile traveled than flying a commercial plane. In other words, every time you let your fear of flying push you behind the steering wheel of your car for a long trip, you actually increase your odds of dying." [via]

Judging from the reporter's opener, (another fucking car wreck), the news of granny's tits was much better copy....