search results matching tag: boyfriend

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (245)     Sift Talk (8)     Blogs (19)     Comments (671)   

Store Cat Food vs Homemade

Payback says...

Anyone who spends this much time making a meal for their cat needs a girlfriend/boyfriend/fuckbuddy.

Don't get me wrong, I understand WHY he's doing it, but honestly, the cat doesn't give a shit and is probably going "WHY I CAN'T JUST HAZ CHEEZBURGER? WHY IZ YOU TEEZING MES?"

Cat's birthdays are 134% about the owner. The cat could NOT care less, and usually is somewhat put out.

artician said:

Are they married?

siftbot (Member Profile)

siftbot says...

Congratulations! Your comment on How to respond when a girl says she has a boyfriend has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

This achievement has earned you your "Silver Tongue" Level 4 Badge!

legacy0100 (Member Profile)

siftbot says...

Congratulations! Your comment on How to respond when a girl says she has a boyfriend has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Vox: Sexist coverage steals the show at 2016 Olympics

Mordhaus says...

I agree with 99% of the examples, but there is one glaring error. Katinka Hosszu was the swimmer from Hungary and the commentary was quite valid. She swam in the 2012 Olympics and did very poorly. She asked her boyfriend at the time to replace the swimming coach she had been with since college. After he took over as her coach and changed her regimen, she destroyed her competition in the World Cup and her dominance carried over to this Olympics.

He is now her husband, but seriously he deserves credit for turning her into a better swimmer in competition. Other than that, I fully agree that the video is quite accurate.

Dallas Officials Report On Shooting Of 11 Officers By Sniper

Video Shows Portion of Dylan Noble Shooting By Fresno Police

CNN anchor reads Survivor's Statement on air

bareboards2 says...

I have also linked this in the description, so people don't have to read the comments to find this link:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/6/6/1534962/-The-daunting-and-powerful-statement-a-Stanford-victim-reads-to-her-rapist-in-court-goes-viral

Here is part of the full statement that was excised for time -- part of where she responds to the defendant's statement, point by point:

You said, Being drunk I just couldn’t make the best decisions and neither could she.

Alcohol is not an excuse. Is it a factor? Yes. But alcohol was not the one who stripped me, fingered me, had my head dragging against the ground, with me almost fully naked. Having too much to drink was an amateur mistake that I admit to, but it is not criminal. Everyone in this room has had a night where they have regretted drinking too much, or knows someone close to them who has had a night where they have regretted drinking too much. Regretting drinking is not the same as regretting sexual assault. We were both drunk, the difference is I did not take off your pants and underwear, touch you inappropriately, and run away. That’s the difference.

You said, If I wanted to get to know her, I should have asked for her number, rather than asking her to go back to my room.

I’m not mad because you didn’t ask for my number. Even if you did know me, I would not want be in this situation. My own boyfriend knows me, but if he asked to finger me behind a dumpster, I would slap him. No girl wants to be in this situation. Nobody. I don’t care if you know their phone number or not.

You said, I stupidly thought it was okay for me to do what everyone around me was doing, which was drinking. I was wrong.

Again, you were not wrong for drinking. Everyone around you was not sexually assaulting me. You were wrong for doing what nobody else was doing, which was pushing your erect dick in your pants against my naked, defenseless body concealed in a dark area, where partygoers could no longer see or protect me, and own my sister could not find me. Sipping fireball is not your crime. Peeling off and discarding my underwear like a candy wrapper to insert your finger into my body, is where you went wrong. Why am I still explaining this.

Mordhaus (Member Profile)

The Friend Zone

newtboy jokingly says...

The 'friend zone' can also be a thing known as her having a 'dick under glass', which means an emergency boyfriend she can use whenever she might feel the need, but that she hopes she never will.

Louis CK on Babies and Gay People and other stuff.

Second Life - An Exploratory Journey

newtboy says...

Second life...where my brother's ex wife found numerous new boyfriends shortly after they got married.

He was smart enough to figure it out and picked her up online as 'Jake', some random guy in another city, set up a weekend sex trip out of state with her, then went to meet her at the airport on her way there to tell her 'BTW, I'm Jake, your new boyfriend that you're going to meet for a sex weekend. Have fun in Chicago, don't bother coming home.'. I can't think of a better way to handle that, except her should have sent her to Wasilla...or maybe Scottsdale.

The Simpsons - YOU'RE NEXT

poolcleaner says...

Way more disturbing than the actual movie it's portraying. Although the movie "You're Next" ain't all that bad. It's a pretty typical slasher but one of the victims turns out to be an ex wilderness survival child born to parents who lived off the land in Australia, so she sets up all these intricate traps to slow down and kill the murders. Pretty awesome at times.

The art film director boyfriend who get shot in the beginning is real life horror director Ti West, who directed an excellent retro satanic cult horror movie called "The House of the Devil". I love that shit. Had one of the actors from You're Next.

Life after 44 years in prison

newtboy says...

No, I didn't miss that part. It simply had no bearing on whether his 'spirit was strong' before he committed his crime. He barely touched on his crime, or his life before conviction, so we know little to nothing about WHY he tried to hurt/kill an officer. It seems you are making a pure assumption.
EDIT: It is most likely that he did not consider the implications of his actions when he attacked an officer for whatever reason he did it...and we have no idea if he was high, trying to escape arrest, just mad at cops, self defense, beating up his girlfriend/wife's boyfriend, trying to kill his daughter's rapist, etc. We know nothing about him before prison except he had a family, and nothing about his crime other than he was charged with attempted murder of a police officer. It might be as simple as he didn't stop fast enough when a cop jumped into the road to stop him, and he had a terrible lawyer...we just don't know.
Where and why did you pull the idea of 'indomitable will' from? No one ever said anything about that. You know there's no such thing, right?
I can barely follow your post, and it does not touch on the topic my post was about....which was....how do you know he didn't feel 'strong of spirit' before he went to prison?

Lawdeedaw said:

You must have missed the part where he recapped what he loved/missed, and how he gave those things up for whatever reason he did (Such as peer pressure, societal judgment, poverty, anger, etc.) The fact that he didn't make excuses truly gives me respect for who the man is, but an indomitable will means not faltering and he did in the past. It was a mistake, and who hasn't made a mistake--even a grievous one? By comparing this great man to what he once was is an injustice to what he has become, and I wouldn't slap him in the face as that comparison ironically has.

Now, he could have had a great will, good will, worthwhile will, but the word indomitable is vastly different from those puny words. He could have tried his best and failed. But again, that is different than staying strong against the others rather than forfeiting the things you most love for the lifestyle that is incompatible and with those precious things.

Spring Valley High "Cop" violently assaults black teen girl

newtboy says...

WHAT?!?
So, you must also think that battered women 'caused this to happen' by not capitulating to their husbands/boyfriends, huh?
You must think those innocent people released from Guantanamo 'caused this to happen' by not making up some terrorist activities to admit to when being tortured?

Sitting quietly is not a crime that requires violence...EVER. The disruption this has caused is exponentially greater than the disruption caused by not leaving class. The proper thing to do would be 1. talk to her and explain that by not following the officers instructions, she's forcing them to expel her and she won't ever be returning to class after today and 2. if that doesn't work, call backup. This bodybuilder cop, Ben Fields, is well known as "Officer Slam" at the school, this is not the first time he's been sued over excessive force, not even the first time he was caught on camera, but this time he was caught strangling and throwing children across the room by the neck.

There's absolutely no excuse for the violence from that officer. They are now trying to claim she hit the cop so his actions were OK...but want us all to ignore that she was flailing and accidentally touched him only AFTER being lifted by the neck with another hand reaching between her legs. In my opinion, it's fine to stab anyone doing that to you when you were simply sitting. Stab them in the eye with your pen...in self defense. I think I might have attacked that douchebag beating up a girl if it had been in my class....and probably paid for it later, but that's better than just sitting by and watching. I couldn't live with myself if I just sat and watched that BS.

Again. I hope she gets paid, and he never has another dime to his name, because she's going to win this lawsuit big time.

artician said:

Yeah seriously, see:
"Did it go too far- yep but the student caused this to happen."

Permeable Concrete? It's like magic!

bareboards2 says...

Years ago, I was at the grocery store with my boyfriend. He picked up a HUGE chunk of caramel that was meant for melting for toffee apples. It was remarkable, how big and heavy this chunk of candy was.

He mused, as he hefted it in his hand, "You know, you could kill someone with this and eat the evidence."

That was 40 years ago, and whenever I see something lethal in the grocery store, that is my very first thought.

You aren't alone, is what I am saying.

PS The boyfriend went on to become a police officer. Yikes.

artician said:

Why, why, why why was the first thought I had: "I bet if someone were murdered on that it would be a lot harder to find the evidence"??

What the fuck is wrong with me today?



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon