search results matching tag: bang your head

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.003 seconds

  • 1
    Videos (3)     Sift Talk (0)     Blogs (0)     Comments (11)   

bobknight33 (Member Profile)

newtboy says...

Hannity - Talking about Biden’s strategies …. “You keep banging your head against a wall. Why would you expect a different result?”
Trump (slurring)- “So we would have had the wall completed in three weeks, it was largely completed.”

Who’s brain is mush?

9/11 Masterminds - Explosive Connections

Fade says...

It's called a cover. Distract everyone with planes so that they aren't focused on the buildings blowing up. It's not that complicated or difficult to imagine. It would be a lot more difficult for terrorists to have set up the demolitions.
You have to admit that this video presents some interesting connections and coincidences, no matter what you believe.>> ^volumptuous:

Retards, all of you.
If there were controlled demolitions, why would they involve airplanes at all? Why not just claim terrorists planted the demolitions, instead of going through all the trouble to ALSO hijack airplanes filled with people, and fly them into buildings at precisely the moment the explosives were set to detonate? Jesus fucking christ you have to be so thick to believe any of this horseshit for even a second.
You must literally have to remove your brain to not instantantly brush this off as the dumbest fairytale ever told.
You people are worse than Religious freaks. Zero evidence, and you keep banging your head against the same retardation wall endlessly.

9/11 Masterminds - Explosive Connections

marbles says...

>> ^volumptuous:

Retards, all of you.
If there were controlled demolitions, why would they involve airplanes at all? Why not just claim terrorists planted the demolitions, instead of going through all the trouble to ALSO hijack airplanes filled with people, and fly them into buildings at precisely the moment the explosives were set to detonate? Jesus fucking christ you have to be so thick to believe any of this horseshit for even a second.
You must literally have to remove your brain to not instantantly brush this off as the dumbest fairytale ever told.
You people are worse than Religious freaks. Zero evidence, and you keep banging your head against the same retardation wall endlessly.


u mad bro?

9/11 Masterminds - Explosive Connections

volumptuous says...

Retards, all of you.

If there were controlled demolitions, why would they involve airplanes at all? Why not just claim terrorists planted the demolitions, instead of going through all the trouble to ALSO hijack airplanes filled with people, and fly them into buildings at precisely the moment the explosives were set to detonate? Jesus fucking christ you have to be so thick to believe any of this horseshit for even a second.

You must literally have to remove your brain to not instantantly brush this off as the dumbest fairytale ever told.

You people are worse than Religious freaks. Zero evidence, and you keep banging your head against the same retardation wall endlessly.

What is liberty?

dgandhi says...

>> ^marbles:
I am wrong to "assume" that the only person that has a right to what I produce is myself?


Conservation of M/E means that you can't create, only rearrange. So to even begin to asses such a position it is necessary to clarify what forces are morally relevant, and how much change is "production"? And then, of course, to explain why we should assume that some forces (only human, I'm guessing) moving things makes them "property", when nothing about the physical world implies any such relationship exists at all.

If you can pull matter out of the aether, you might be able to fashion some sort of internally consistent ideology around that, but since you can't, your just banging your head against physics demanding that it is so.

Saying that we accept an absurdity as a social convention is simple enough, but to demand, despite all evidence, that it is true is unbelievable foolishness.

Adam Lambert and media cowardice

Asmo says...

>> ^Enzoblue:
I guess you have to ask yourself why this got censored. I mean really. Why do people find this more offensive than all the other stuff?


Redneck homophobia...

Ask that instead of banging your head against the wall like this guy. What is it about two men kissing in the context of high-end sexual perversion that repulses, when two women doing the same would cause the ratings would go up?


High end sexual perversion? Oh, you mean because two guys would end up anal fucking? You should really get out more, that's not high end sexual perversion my friend... 2 girls 1 cup ring any bells?


His incredulity is high because his logic fails. He's not accounting for all the factors, there's more to it than just a redneck hatred for gays.


So basically your entire 'debunk' is people object because the logical result of 2 guys kissing = teh buttsecks?

It says a lot about those people, they see two guys together and instantly visualise them banging away like a broken barnyard door. Might be because that's what they secretly want to see though... Bit of peaking out of the closet action? *grin*

Adam Lambert and media cowardice

Enzoblue says...

I guess you have to ask yourself why this got censored. I mean really. Why do people find this more offensive than all the other stuff? Ask that instead of banging your head against the wall like this guy. What is it about two men kissing in the context of high-end sexual perversion that repulses, when two women doing the same would cause the ratings would go up?

His incredulity is high because his logic fails. He's not accounting for all the factors, there's more to it than just a redneck hatred for gays.

Magic Japanese ringtone allegedly increases breast size

"Stephen King Doesn't Know Literature"

Is it poor form to upvote your own sift post? (Sift Talk Post)

Richard Dawkins interviewed by Bill O'Reilly

choggie says...

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter." - Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922...., if Hitler said it, that says it all...but wasn't Jesus more like Hitler??? After all, not only was he a fighter...he was a[fill in blanks to make you feel good here]....what about a symbol??? Hay-zeus and Hitler are symbolic.....ever here of Carl Jung, read that shit for a religion to follow, pretty close to Buddhism....and so it goes, we associate that which is aberrant or beautiful filtered through the lens of perception....a glass darkly?....Philip K. Dick said it, so did the Apostle Paul.....what do YOU think is wrong with this picture???

"having a brick wall handy to bang your head against for relief"-


love his too, how true also of sporting events, the fans and fetishes, all relief valves of societies contrived and controlled...Hitler was a madman, no, he tunnel visioned himself down the ultimate path of any sentient beings' destruction, who has no governor...oh, and he was the ultimate asshole.......

So...to hang on Hitler, do you make an assumption or read between the words????.....Propaganda of the kind that is broadcast for mass consumption today is the Antichrist in all her splendor.....Babylon, baby, fill yer' head with Lucky Charms and you'll be doing yourself a better dose.......

This vids an example of
Interchangable pundits of self, expressing the current paradigm in familiar, cabalistic, semantic bleats, ....an editorial, fer crissakes.......

  • 1


Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon