Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Your video, Biker gets taken out by an African antelope, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 1 Badge!

Oooh correction - technically a red hartebeest is an antelope as it has an even number of toes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antelope and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hartebeest).

I learned this while attempting to scold dag for using the term. Damn you dag - you win again!

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Wow. There's something you don't see everyday. Didn't know that antelopes were such road-rage dicks.

>> ^dgandhi:

>> ^shinyblurry:
Did you know that Cyrus freeing of the slaves confirms the bible is true?

[sarcasm]
[PROPHESY] I'm going to eat pickles while writing this post [/PROPHESY]
Clearly, since text can not be edited, all text which precedes a statement must, of necessity, predate it. Therefore if a claim is made in a text, and then said to be fulfilled in the same text, the author must be a true profit.
[/sarcasm]
>> ^shinyblurry:
Titus Flavius Josephus. The same historian who confirms that Jesus was a historical figure and affirms His life death and resurrection.

Josephus's testimony is widely considered forged, and few, excepting christian ideologues, claim that it has not been at least altered. The older Arabic translation does not contain a profession of faith, just an account of the claims of the followers, and saying that christians exist, is not the same as saying that they have their facts straight.
Josephus, of course, is not the only source on Cyrus, he ruled a fucking empire, he was not some two bit sheep herd. Yet you avoid the issue, you made a claim, Cyrus refutes it.
>> ^shinyblurry:
This agrees with modern historians, almost none of which make the ridiculous claim that Jesus never existed.

Some do make this "ridiculous" claim, and those who are left still have not provided the slightest shred of evidence that someone of that name did anything like what is stated in the gospels.
There is no historical reason to believe that such a person did exist, and the gospels are so glaringly contradictory that the authors clearly cared nothing about historical accuracy. Absent any historical authority in the gospels, or the forgeries, there is just as much chance that some guy named meatloaf was tearing around Galilee on his motorcycle at or around 30CE, but I don't believe it.
P.S. I ate pickles

+1 for the pickles...

I had Antelope.

My question is why is it always African animals in the pictures? Giraffes, lions, antelopes, etc. I never see Noa's Ark pictures with say bison or wolves or anything like that.

Course in the end we all know that the story is preposterous and like all the stories from that time, a myth. I wish everyone would wake up and realize that simple truth.

The guy (TigerhataKilla) who posts these on youtube is fascinating, i came across his channel a year or two ago. He is a Tiger 'fanboi'. Yeah that's right, they exist. Check out all of his uploads, they're hilariously named and captioned. Like 'Lion gets pwned by antelope' or 'Lion.. durrr outsmarted' etc. It seems like it's his life's work to endlessly troll lions for some reason.

Antipope.. lions eating antelopes. lmao



>> ^EDD:

>> ^Gallowflak:
I'm sorry, but if he has Asperger's rather than full-on ASD, I'm the fucking Antipope.

So you're this guy? http://videosift.com/video/Zlad-I-Am-The-Anti-Pope-Zladko-Zlad-Vladcik

I'm getting sick of these stupid titles.

WHERE IN THIS VIDEO IS A FUCKING ANTELOPE PRANCING AROUND A LION.

They showed one clip of a wet lion. So fucking what? Where is this prancing going on? No, prey animals do not prance around fucking lions.

Man I'm really gonna have to rethink my Cheetah > Hyena > Antelope theory

Antelope: 1
Food Chain: 0

Thanks to the miracle of google, you've very likely saved the life of an antelope in the distant future who found this helpful tip on his hoof mounted PDA in his moment of need.

Well done, Kymbos. Well done.

Wilson: "Antelope lie!"

so retarded , so mind numbly stupid , Evan if it is a portrayal of American teen retardation.

we as humans are nature there for anything we produce is natural, and evan within the destination of us being different from the rest of nature because we seem to think in more complicated fashion than other creatures. you cannot make an argument for "natural" things being safer than unnatural things, and well as for belife in god in the first place why belive in something that has no evidence, i wouldn't go near this wench girl she has such brain rott id rather have sex with a aids ridden antelope.

That being said, he was raised as an anglican Christian, So he tends to stick with that when he challenges specific religious claims. What he mainly does speak against, however, is Gods, any and all gods, the abrahamic, hindu, norse or greek gods, or the more deistic god of the enlightenment, and most certainly the creationist God that people try combating science with.

Speaking of Creationist loonies, Heard the recent exchange between Ray "The banana Man" Comfort and Blogger and Biology Professor PZ Myers? Its hilarious.


Ray Comfort:"I simply expose atheistic evolution for the unscientific fairy tale that it is, and I do it with common logic. I ask questions about where the female came from for each species. Every male dog, cat, horse, elephant, giraffe, fish and bird had to have coincidentally evolved with a female alongside it (over billions of years) with fully evolved compatible reproductive parts and a desire to mate, otherwise the species couldn't keep going. Evolution has no explanation for the female for every species in creation,"

PZ Myers response:"I know Ray is rather stupid, but who knew he could be that stupid. This has been explained to him multiple times: evolution does explain this stuff trivially. Populations evolve, not individuals, and male and female elephants evolved from populations of pre-elephants that contained males and females. Species do not arise from single new mutant males that then have to find a corresponding mutant female – they arise by the diffusion of variation through a whole population, male and female."

Comfort counters...At what point of time in evolutionary history did the female evolve alongside the male? And why did she evolve? Then explain, if you would professor, why horses, giraffes, cattle, zebras, leopards, primates, antelopes, pigs, dogs, sheep, fish, goats, mice, squirrels, whales, chickens, dinosaurs, beavers, cats, human beings and rats also evolved with a female, at some point of time in evolutionary history.

At this appalling ignorance, most of us would just give up, But not PZ, instead he lashes out the most embarrasing (for Comfort) putdowns in the history of ass-whopping:
Elephantine errors from Ray Comfort