search results matching tag: Schrodinger
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
| Videos (14) | Sift Talk (1) | Blogs (1) | Comments (56) |
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
| Videos (14) | Sift Talk (1) | Blogs (1) | Comments (56) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Many will die shortly
MordhausI think we allowed tsunami videos where we know that people are dying on screen but we don't have a zoomed in perspective to their deaths. Like we know there is no way they could have lived, but if we want to get Schrodinger about it we can't actually 'see' them die.
To me death in a video would be unacceptable if you were to see the actual death and it didn't serve an educational purpose, such as exposing an illegal shooting or something else of equivalent nature.
I voted it up. If they had zoomed into a section and showed people's bodies flying or getting crushed I probably wouldn't have voted or I would have called it snuff.
Australian Men Are All Considered Pedophiles
ChaosEngineYeah, along with stories about:
- how climate change is a hoax
- why sexual harassment laws mean the end of romance
- how immigrants are stealing your job
- how immigrants are lazy bastards who don't work and take the dole (I presume these are Schrodinger's immigrants?)
- how the youth of today just need a good war to sort them out
First Today Tonight, now the Daily Mail?
Fucking hell, the standards for journalism are falling through the floor.
The UK's DailyMail posts a story of a female teacher molesting a student almost everyday.
eric3579
(Member Profile)
radxFor your daily dose of dafuq, I refer you to this: Schrödinger's cat caught on quantum film
Skydiver Almost Struck By Meteorite
BicycleRepairManI think this might be legit, this report is made by a science show on NRK called "Schrodingers cat" They are (in addition to having picked a really cool name) usually thorough and fact-based, and they have been running since 1990. NRK is the Norwegian counterpart to the BBC.
It is of course possible that the diver has faked the footage etc, but if so, he has fooled not just the tv-show but also a few scientists. They've even organized search groups to look for this thing.
Buffalo Sabres win in OT on one of the strangest goals ...
PaybackTL/DR- Schrodinger's Puck: It was and wasn't a goal, all at the same time.
In case anyone is wondering why they are making a semi-big deal about whether or not you can see the puck once it is across the line, I remember several years ago there was a play where a goalie covered up the puck with his glove (which should result in a whistle, but in this case didn't immediately) and in the split second afterwards had 90% of his glove, including the portion where the puck had been visible a split second before, pushed across the goal line.
The play went under review, and I believe Darren Pang (a former goalie) was confident that it would be ruled no goal because even though it was next to 100% obvious that the puck had crossed the goal line, you couldn't physically see it. The review came back and he had been correct, and he ventured further that even in a hypothetical situation where the puck slipped under a goalie's leg or something (out of sight of any camera) and then the goalie's entire body slid into the net across the line, it would be ruled no goal if the puck was obscured from vision until the play was whistled dead.
I thought it was interesting that the laws of physics can assert that the puck MUST be in there, but according to the rules it won't count unless you can directly SEE it across the line.
At least, that is how I remember the discussion going. Anyone care to confirm or set me straight on any details I may have screwed up?
Not Your Average Schrodinger's Cat
probie>> ^Phreezdryd:
>> ^probie:
>> ^BicycleRepairMan:
But god DAMN that was a nice Half-Life reference with the crowbar and pickup sound!
Sheesh. A few too many imho. Portal cube, headcrab in the jar, lambda symbols all over the place. Talk about subliminal advertising. It's not like Valve needs any........more.......awesome games! Valve is the best developer ever! I love this video! I'm gonna go load up Half-Life 2.
Have you had a look at the Black Mesa overhaul of Half-Life 1?
Oh, and I think I spy a Portal turret and possibly a picture on the wall with Gordon.
Oh yes. They did a lot of good things in that mod; and some bad. Ladders, for one. There's also another team working on recreating Opposing Force for Source.
Not Your Average Schrodinger's Cat
Phreezdryd>> ^probie:
>> ^BicycleRepairMan:
But god DAMN that was a nice Half-Life reference with the crowbar and pickup sound!
Sheesh. A few too many imho. Portal cube, headcrab in the jar, lambda symbols all over the place. Talk about subliminal advertising. It's not like Valve needs any........more.......awesome games! Valve is the best developer ever! I love this video! I'm gonna go load up Half-Life 2.
Have you had a look at the Black Mesa overhaul of Half-Life 1?
Oh, and I think I spy a Portal turret and possibly a picture on the wall with Gordon.
Not Your Average Schrodinger's Cat
probie>> ^BicycleRepairMan:
But god DAMN that was a nice Half-Life reference with the crowbar and pickup sound!
Sheesh. A few too many imho. Portal cube, headcrab in the jar, lambda symbols all over the place. Talk about subliminal advertising. It's not like Valve needs any........more.......awesome games! Valve is the best developer ever! I love this video! I'm gonna go load up Half-Life 2.
Not Your Average Schrodinger's Cat
BicycleRepairManSchrodinger probably didn't even have a cat, and didn't actually perform the experiment. Poor fellow gets a bad rep because people dont get the "thought" part of "thought experiment". But god DAMN that was a nice Half-Life reference with the crowbar and pickup sound!
Cat Bank vs Cat
00Scud00 says...>> ^artician:
>> ^00Scud00:
Proof that Schrodinger is wrong, that cat is clearly alive.
Incorrect!
Is the cat alive? Or is the cat battery operated?
It's alive as long as the batteries keep up.
Cat Bank vs Cat
artician>> ^00Scud00:
Proof that Schrodinger is wrong, that cat is clearly alive.
Incorrect!
Is the cat alive? Or is the cat battery operated?
Cat Bank vs Cat
00Scud00 jokingly says...Proof that Schrodinger is wrong, that cat is clearly alive.
Ron Paul: "If it's an honest rape..."
cosmovitelli says...>> ^entr0py:
Wait, did Paul just give a schrodinger's womb defense? That was some creative hypocrisy.
That's very good. For you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5RvDorEnMc&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Ron Paul: "If it's an honest rape..."
ChaosEngine>> ^entr0py:
Wait, did Paul just give a schrodinger's womb defense? That was some creative hypocrisy.
Yep. and while we're on the subject...
Ron Paul: "If it's an honest rape..."
entr0pyWait, did Paul just give a schrodinger's womb defense? That was some creative hypocrisy.