Pink Floyd talks about Clare's singing on the song at the 25 min mark.

Pain and suffering. Easy $200k settlement. Or $1 million min at trial for any decent lawyer.

*ban self link. Posted within 15 mins of it posting on yt. Also spam.

I think the length is more accurately around *length=2:00 (surely not 56 min). Also think a *promote is in order. @Mordus feel free of course to edit the time that you deem appropriate if i've gotten it wrong.

*ban self link. Posted to vimeo 30 min ago

I was stopping 10 min in, then read your comment. Stayed for Leia and Padme. Not disappointing

awsome i love it
you went learn how to play despacito in 7 min watch :[url redacted]

Full context..
You can start around 4 min mark.
Then skim to 10:30 mark.
Yea they should still be in jail picking up litter at 12 cents/hour.



Many of those scheduled to be released have not been properly vetted and are a danger to our safety and property. - OK to pick up trash. but not release.

I mixed up your two fire rates (.2 and .12) still you said you can keep up 5rps for many minutes (10 for a short time) not 3...."My lazy firing rate has splits (time between shots) of approximately 0.2 seconds. I can do that for a long time (many minutes before I slow done). That is a rate of 300 rounds per minute. My fast splits are approximately 0.12 seconds. I can't do that for very long (probably one magazine). That is a rate of 600 rounds per minute." And that's only really 300rpm if you have a 300 round mag.

....wait...why am I wasting my time on this? It's clear you're not comparing Apple's to Apple's.
You didn't come close to convincing me that manual 120 shots per minute at 400 yards all well aimed is believable...even belt fed. Keep in mind he actually averaged hitting one moving person in the dark at 400 yards per second for 10 minutes. Your generous competition numbers have you double tapping at 45 targets per min (without a hit rate given, or range).

First you claimed .2 second split is 300 rpm, now you say it's 90rpm. I'm so over this. Have fun at the range.
Again, the target was the crowd. He got more lead on that target on auto. No aim needed.
I've been shooting (non competitively) for 40 years btw, after rifle marksmanship courses for 3 years starting at 7...but thanks for the suggestion.

1963 Wow--
Picking starts at 1 min

I was 2 in 1963

@bcglorf

I'll have to take your word for how they're marked on this, because you've talked to the teachers and whatnot, and i've spent 20 mins looking at the document without finding any regulations on it. I spent most of my time reading the examples. The rest was chock full of text and a bit hard to digest so like a true scientist i gave up.

I can't defend that, i think in essence they've got a very good idea. I've always been good with maths, and i remember when i was learning what i thought were hard bits, i'd find shortcuts a lot like they suggest. And by luck that helped me a lot with more advanced maths. I think these methods are great to set people up for algebra, infinitesimals and therefore calculus. But it's also a very top heavy burden to place on a learning mind, and you're presuming they'd have a use for it, or have the knack for it. And then if you test them on it, you're testing their ability to do stuff they don't need yet.

The way you say it, it's like it was designed by someone with a bit of a gift for maths but no idea about teaching, or kids, or how other people think. These are great ideas for pushing kids to better understanding though. Could easily confuse people.

The people who made the video talk about it here. I listened to a bit and they mention the recording and playback speeds were mucked with a lot, but it's apparent the robots playing the instruments were real in a physical way (the music they played sucked it seems). Listening to them talk about how crazy programming the robots were was entertaining. But yes lots of movie magic type stuff im guessing.
https://soundcloud.com/onlymoviepod/120-aliens (first 17 mins is about the music video)

There had to be a safer place to hole up. That looks like a min or two from death by misadventure.

10 minutes was more than enough listening to get him.
He's one of the 'look,
I'm a rational person, even a lefty, not a right wing nutjob, so listen to me as I denounce and demean the left and excuse and coddle the right....because I'm not right wing, really, I'm not." guys. It's not new, I've heard it before. No need to watch more, as I said, 10 min was 9 1/2 longer than I needed, but I was willing to give him the benefit of a doubt that I might be wrong...I wasn't. By then he had exposed his right wing bias clearly and undeniably.

(edit)

@hermannthegerman This is the same as the other video you posted (Nuclear waste). Just different title. Very small part is actually about Bannon as it's the whole episode.
For reference(whole episode) https://youtu.be/8NlH-5sva2s

Here is the Bannon piece if you want to fix this dead video to match the title. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF5PPtT_ZP4

I would fix it myself if i knew you would want to change the video. However Its a minute and a half compared to almost 30 min.