And now we know the history of the phrase "grapes of wrath"

"The angel swung his sickle on the earth, gathered its grapes and threw them into the great microwave of God’s wrath. They were cooked in the microwave outside the city, and plasma flowed out of the microwave, rising as high as the horses’ bridles for a distance of 1,600 stadia."
-Revelation 14:19-20

The grapes shall fear us now.

Bob
You're so dishonest. You've said clearly that you go to bed hating me. ;-)

In the tape, I see the clear opportunity to plant evidence (with no other explanation for what he was doing retrieving something in his squad car after shooting him but before he's even removed from the car, and sitting in the victims car with his body camera off), which he hides from the cameras in his uniform instead of showing it off to bystanders in his hands, and when tested, the gun only had the officers DNA and fingerprints, and the victim wasn't wearing gloves, the cop was. No explanation given for any of that.
Edit: that's motive, means, and opportunity, and unexplained evidence with no other reasonable explanation.
Case closed.

EDIT: Given the exact same circumstances but a black citizen shooting another citizen, then performing the exact same hyper suspicious actions, you would absolutely, zero question in my mind, say it's incontrovertible that the black man murdered the other man and planted a gun and drugs to get away with it.

Funny, you and your side of the isle has spent at least 8 years in the streets over sour grapes, now you suddenly think you're reasonable and thoughtful....but you don't even understand the words.

If blacks were killing officers at the rate that officers are killing blacks, you would say they've declared open season on law enforcement...oh wait, you've already said that, even though cops actually kill 25 times more citizens than people kill cops, and by far most of those citizens are black.

Newt, As much as I like you I just don't' see wrong doing on the tape below. Where in the tape do you see the planting?

The moments in question of the planting starts around 625 in the tape below.




I see nothing in his hands when he exits his vehicle nor do I see anything as he walks around before he enters the suspects vehicle.


It not an open season on blacks, just justified actions of men in blue.

Delusional grownups seeing things that are not true. Hoping against hope for it to be so. Only to have the truth of the law burst their bubble. Sour grapes and protesting in the streets are the outlet of those without the ability of thought and reason.

I guess that answers the question "what happened to Arnie from What's Eating Gilbert Grape?"

Naw, those people you're thinking of -- more like Arnie Grape.

Infact, there's a VERY famous video now of a woman who was crushing grapes and fell off (It was a news anchor thing.)

Ebaums was the only place to actually see the video because everywhere else took it down.

The Concorde was never really successful though, because Americans wouldn't let it fly through American airspace (well, not farther than NYC, anyhow). They claimed it was because of the noise, but in reality it was just sour grapes at being beaten by the French.

Call him Gandalf the Grape.

Same thing happened to me with a bag of green grapes from a Costco about 15 years ago. Good times.

I wondered how good their experts were too

That said though, Shiraz grapes are used to make both red and white wines and some whites are quite full bodied and can easily stand in for a red. It would be easy to be fooled if you weren't expecting tricks.

I'm fortunate to live in a city where it's really hard to buy an undrinkable wine. Even the cheap ones that I use for cooking are quite nice, although a little less complex than the mid range wines.

p.s. The actual study by Frédéric Brochet is linked from this article - http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2014/08/the_most_infamous_study_on_wine_tasting.html (which also points out that the study used oenology students).

Yes, I do see that...and they should have been tagged snuff when they were posted...I'm rather surprised they weren't.
I do, however, feel that the sudden interest in finding and removing all the snuff videos is not truly about fairness or bettering the sift (I wish I did think that) but rather I feel it's about sour grapes, and getting back at the admin that ruled against him. Perhaps I'm wrong about that, but it certainly looks that way from my viewpoint.

I did think the argument was a red herring and had nothing to do with THAT video being snuff or not...just because some videos didn't get properly tagged doesn't mean the tag should not be used when it's appropriate.

Yes, I was quite offended. The title gave no hint that I was about to watch a double homicide, and I'm really not looking to watch that kind of thing. My estimation of humanity is bad enough already. Because he said in his description that he didn't think it was snuff, and it clearly fit every point of the definition, I had to ask what he meant...and since he had just tricked me into watching a murder, I didn't ask nicely.

I also see less of what I'm looking for, and have noticed the reduced traffic, but I still love the sift as a place to find better (not always great) videos with rules and a community that makes it a place I can spend time...unlike youtube or reddit, etc. which are just rooms full of angry pre-teen girls it seems.

Love you too, cock fag, but the wife said we can only make out if she gets to film it....that goes for him too.