Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Wow, this video really draws out the spammers! The carrie prejean lightning rod.

*cough* http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009/11/exclusive-30-nude-photos-8-sex-tapes-carrie-prejean-surface *cough*

>> ^brain:
So, did the caller say "I love faggots"?


I don't think she cares about Harleys.

>> ^demon_ix:
Mmm. http://www.videosift.com/video/Larry-King-Carrie-Prejean-Takes-Of
f-Microphone


*discuss

Mmm. http://www.videosift.com/video/Larry-King-Carrie-Prejean-Takes-Off-Microphone

Your video, Vote Up To Torment This Christian Woman (Carrie Prejean), has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

"The load I took - by Carrie Prejean"

>> ^bcglorf: So do you think it wrong in both examples then?

While I do agree that being a dick should not be legally defensible as religious expression, it's unfortunately creates all sorts of gray areas. People can be offended by anything, and allowing employers to decide what public opinions their employees may hold is in direct conflict with the rights of citizens in a society which claims to value freedom of expression. I am content to have it either way, but it should be consistently applied, unfortunately nothing ever is.

The thing that strikes me about this guy is that he is a clear copy-cat of carrie prejean. The argument " you can't hold me responsible for what I say if I invoke god" was her MO, and all her worshipers have fed this absurd notion that claiming to be religious should be a free pass. I don't think anybody in that camp will get how ridiculous this guys whining is.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

>> ^honkeytonk73:
He always gawks at the other presenters tits... and so do I


I've never noticed that before - but I just watched it again, and I do believe you're right - quite blatantly.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'TYT, Carrie, Prejean, sex, tape, hypocrisy, family, values, right wing, morality, gays' to 'TYT, Carrie Prejean, sex tape, hypocrisy, family values, right wing, morality, gays' - edited by dystopianfuturetoday

tag advice...
carrie prejean: 1 term
sex tape: 1 term
family values: 1 term

"Carrie Prejean (the queen of morality, miss family values) has a sex tape."

Of course she does. She wouldn't be a God fearing, queer hating, abortion despising, public option bashing, Bible thumping, hypocritical Christian woman if she didn't!

Fascinating indeed. I really think Rachel has it wrong about Carrie Prejean though. There is no way that the would-be Miss USA ever has a chance of holding office IMO. But...Well we did get pretty damned close to electing a moron beauty pageant winner in 2008.

It's frightening to watch people so openly and publicly celebrate intolerance. The people I really feel for are the kids in situations like this. I wonder what dinner table discussions are like at the home of the person who wrote "Why Should God Bless America?" are like for example.

>> ^quantumushroom:
A question for all you supporters of gay marriage: one of the arguments of the pro-gay marriage side is that men and women are "interchangeable", and there are no significant differences between the sexes. If that's true, then why is it so important that another woman be on the Supreme Court--or preferentially placed anywhere else for that matter--when everyone is "the same"?
Another question for all you supporters of gay marriage. The polygamists are right behind you in line to make their marital arrangements as valid as yours. Since the specialness of one man/one woman is no longer special, how do you propose to discriminate against polygamists?



I dont support affirmative action blindly. I subscribe to the idea that people are excited about a new woman on the bench because the people presiding at that post have traditionally (or I should say almost exclusively) been white males. The idea that a Hispanic woman would give a more rounded perspective to the court is valid and it's what i believe she meant when she commented on her background giving her an advantage.

Varied perspectives keep the court honest and that's what people are celebrating. I'm sure liberals (and people in general) would feel the same way if the court were dominated by Hispanic females and a white male was up for nomination.

Also, the polygamy argument you make is a false analogy. There is a huge difference between two people getting married and one person making their own 'tribe' if you will.