I'm used to it by now.
Come with the territory, evidently. I liked your post on the matter, btw., many thanks.

In reply to this comment by smooman:
hows you holdin up under the inquisition? =P

slapstick and the internet do not bode well.

Sir, I assure you to my utmost highest standard that the Banana Hammock wearing Cowboy in my avatar is entirely TOO clothed for how his sexy Atlas Sculpted body glistens in the Humid heat of the camera lights. This male figure should disgust neither I nor you.

The fact you bring this up as something that would or should be disgusting, a picture, of the male body that is; and a woman geting a nut shot really surprises me.

woman gratuitously getting a punch in the box- Ok

Man in a speedo= Not ok


Good luck with society smooman,seems you may need that.

In reply to this comment by smooman:
assuming you were being facetious i found it curious that that video would disgust you or otherwise offend your sensibilities when your avatar is of a man wearing an entirely too small g string......

In reply to this comment by BoneRemake:
explain your self further, this is not making any sense to me, I would like to understand what you mean before I handle the situation in a fashion un-becoming of what is coming.

In reply to this comment by smooman:
>> ^BoneRemake:

nICE, some quality shit right there. Totally Betters the sift, totally. keeping on par with the ass dance skanks


really? have you seen your avatar? i mean i know you picked it, but have you looked at it?

explain your self further, this is not making any sense to me, I would like to understand what you mean before I handle the situation in a fashion un-becoming of what is coming.

In reply to this comment by smooman:
>> ^BoneRemake:

nICE, some quality shit right there. Totally Betters the sift, totally. keeping on par with the ass dance skanks


really? have you seen your avatar? i mean i know you picked it, but have you looked at it?

LOL thanks!
In reply to this comment by smooman:
ps: your avatar is the best ever

In reply to this comment by smooman:
>> ^Ti_Moth:

>> ^shinyblurry:
I mean without faith what do you have?
>> ^smooman:
ps: shinyblurry, science has, quite conclusively, proven that the earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old....but thats neither here nor there. You at least recognize that it doesnt matter (as do i), as it pertains ones personal relationship with god.
The bible wasnt written to tell me how old the earth is =)



Err... Evidence and critical thinking?


while that may be true, they are not mutually exclusive.
faith is the evidence of things unseen (i know thats gonna mean zilch to you so take that with a grain of salt) and i very seriously doubt you could convincingly question the critical thinking skills of persons such as CS Lewis

i dont think atheists (or non christians for that matter) are godless sinners, devoid of any morality, any more than i would hope that you not think me an ignorant, bumbling, neanderthal because im religious

we have different religious views, however this does not make either of us smarter, more critical, or better than the other because of that fact


ok..now i want to have YOUR babies.
pegg is gonna have to go it alone.
right on man.

In reply to this comment by smooman:
oh for fuck sake, enoch and peggedbea, the fact that you two took such offense to a comment that was glaringly obvious as a joke about your avatar (peggedbea) just shows how damn tightly wound you two are in this discussion (if you could even call it that). Hell, i immediately recognized it for what it was: an ice breaking joke observing the exposed organs of peggedbea's avatar.

This is why i try to stay out of religion talks cuz sooner or later it devolves into a vile mess

yeah.i missed that.
maybe due to the fact that blurry is an insufferable cock.
i tried defending blurry when i first encountered him and he threw me under the bus.
while that is no big deal.
the one thing that drives me nuts is hypocrisy and i will call anyone out for behaving as such.
that and i find it amusing.i am no longer wishing to engage or discuss because blurry has made it evident that he could care less about discussion and more about hearing himself talk.

so now i am just in it for the entertainment factor alone.
why?
cuz fuck him..thats why.

you are correct on me missing his joke.
but this isnt his first time to the ball here on the sift.
so...
im gonna play.

Wow that's some good shit! Seriously. That's your brother singing that? Kind of reminds me of The Deftones. At least he can sing originals, something I never could get the knack for. I'm just a imitator unfortunately. Never could find my voice. Mostly due to me being overly critical of my own singing I was just never happy with any original stuff I did.

And yes /handshake. I can pretty much be a prick myself when I want to be as you no doubt have figured out, LOL. I hate arguing with musicians. We are all brothers and sisters in my eyes.

In reply to this comment by smooman:
In reply to this comment by Duckman33:
>> ^smooman:

and whats funny about karaoke? its fun (usually more so if you CANT sing like me), derp derp derp, ......and probably stuck up


Exactly, which is why I don't take it seriously when someone refers to a karaoke star as proof of talent. And yes if that makes me stuck up then so be it. I'm stuck up.

more than just a "karaoke star" i assure you: http://soundcloud.com/sphiralstudios (our bands works in progress page)
http://soundcloud.com/wolvestulsa (the full page, mixed and mastered. A few are being redone, namely Under Cover of Night and Some Kind of Bird, mainly because the songs have evolved from when we first wrote and recorded em (whats on there now) to what they are currently)

its in my nature to be an asshole, it takes some getting used to i suppose, so apologies for that. Put in another way, i was merely pointing out that i had four other "professional grade" singers listen to it and they flatly disagreed with your position, namely that there were plenty of "sour notes" and just an overall lack of pitch control (a talent rarely seen in today's pop stars, as opposed to say, maynard james keenan).

Guess thats just what i was trying to say, but in a dickish manner =P

/handshake?

Happy anniversary! Today marks year number 2 since you first became a Sifter and the community is better for having you. Thanks for your contributions!

Your video, Get On My Horse (Warcraft edition), has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

well thanks anyway. I appreciate the sentiment.


In reply to this comment by smooman:
non music-appreciating bastards, i'd promote the hell outta this sift if i had the privilege

Yay! Rape!

In reply to this comment by smooman:
In reply to this comment by blankfist:
Gay nerd.

=(

At least we have something in common........lets go on a gay raping/murder spree!!!

Gay nerd.

We may disagree on a LOT of topics, but much respect to anyone who responds to personal attacks like that with self-depreciating humor. That's an instant-win in my book

In reply to this comment by smooman:
smooman derives from the show Dinosaurs (remember that show?) there was an episode where Baby was watching TV and all the shows had foul language in them (albeit made up Dinosaur foul language). Smoo was one of those words, along with flark, glimp........and another I cant remember.

I just thought it was a funny word and i plugged it in my online handle and it stuck ever since.


But secretly it means Smoochman which is a euphemism for homo-ass-to-mouth