Its ok he is an "artist" spread your legs and get your vagina out .

Of course its not art filming vaginas for pornographic purposes its only art if its not sexually arousing and placed in a white room.

^it's art when it is created for beauty and provoking thought.

edit: behold the culinary derivative!

The final exhibition: http://videosift.com/video/The-great-wall-of-vagina-exhibition

I love vaginas as much as any big ape, but seeing a whole wall of them makes me a little squeamish.

That's going to be one busy gift shop.

>> ^westy:

Its ok he is an "artist" spread your legs and get your vagina out .
Of course its not art filming vaginas for pornographic purposes its only art if its not sexually arousing and placed in a white room.


All this is doing is showing that you think the naked body is inherently sexual and 'rude'. There are those who just see them as bodies, bodyparts. Able to be sexual for sure, but by no means only that. As kids you don't think of them that way, it's only as you get older you learn to find them rude.

It's interesting work because it's showing 'normal' vaginas and the differences between them. Most women probably only see their own and then ones in porn, which are not 'normal'.

So I applaud it. And question your views on nudity.

I see that wall, and I feel like I'm a heartbeat away from the event horizon of one of the biggest black holes ever....

maybe he's just a mega perv hiding under an umbrella of artistic righteousness

If so, I would argue that he is a mega-ineffective perv. Talk about Rube-Golberging your way to a lady's fanny!

>> ^deathcow:

maybe he's just a mega perv hiding under an umbrella of artistic righteousness