From the video description: "On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple techniques of image manipulation were employed to simulate "airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks were proactively complicit in staging this false-flag operation needed to gather public consensus to wage immensely profitable, illegal wars.
The forensic analysis of the live images leave no room for doubt : they do not depict the real-life events of the day but turn out to be entirely doctored video sequences which effectively fooled the worldwide TV audience. Thus, the live broadcasts now stored in the major TV networks' archives, constitute the most solid, verifiable and repeatable proof to expose the falseness of the official version of the 9/11 tragedy.
The subsequently released, so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites yet all have now been exposed for what they are :digital forgeries. Most likely, electromagnetic technology commonly used in war zones (to jam electronic circuitries) prevented any private footage being recorded at the time of the tower strikes. Scores of testimonies confirm that cellphones or firefighters' walkie-talkies did not function properly in NYC that day.
Most on-the-scene witnesses reported a SMALL aircraft of some sort : Arguably, what they saw was a winged missile. The 4 purported hijacked flights, as well as the related passenger lists, turn out to have several problems as far as their authenticity is concerned : a long list of documentation (or lack of it) reveal serious discrepancies regarding NTSB, BTS and FAA data. All of the above facts, taken together, suggest that the official version of the events is fraudulent."
8 Comments
Nykwilsays...I could tell you the truth but then I'd have to give back all the money I made from the truth
Edgeman2112Upvote for compelling evidence of compositing.
StukaFoxsays...You're out of your fucking mind.
EndAllMe, personally?
dagComment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)
The fade to black portions are the weirdest part for me. Why would that happen precisely at that moment?
EndAllThe black-outs would have had to be done manually, by someone sitting in the control room. The fact that they happened on several different networks lends credence to the theory that all the video feeds were controlled from a single, central control room.
MaxWilderAlmost all of these oddities are easily explained with slight differences in camera angles mixed with extremes telephoto lenses. All of these camera shots were miles away from ground zero.
The timing of the blackouts are strangely similar, but why would there be black-outs at all? Because during live video shots, technicians were sitting at the controls with orders from the FCC to not show "traumatic imagerey" on live tv. That's why they have a tape delay. This is in large part due to a suicide by shotgun that was accidentally broadcast live in 1998. News stations all moved to tape delays and had instructions to "obscure" violence that happened during live broadcasts.
Some thought the plane impact was such a moment, others did not. Obviously two people at two different tv stations had very similar gut reactions: to obscure the moment of impact, but get back to the shot as soon as possible. And their timing was a little slow.
Obviously this is just a guess, but it is far more plausible than some vast conspiracy that the US government is incapable of pulling off.
....
Trying to finish watching, but it's too painful. Whoever made this can't grasp simple concepts like perspective.
And they think it's more likely that a super-sophisticated virtual reality program accidentally made a background character translucent rather than do a little research about video interleaving and compression.
And they think to simplify complex concepts like acoustic dynamics in a dense urban environment.
Patently absurd. I can't finish watching.
Give me some real evidence. Lets hear from some of the dozens or hundreds of government workers that had to have been involved in this so-called fabrication. I would believe one single whistle-blower with some real government credentials over a thousand "charcoal" planes and "road-runner" physics videos.
EndAllhttp://www.sheilacasey.com/2009/08/deep-state-does-not-respond-to-foia-requests.html#more
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.