New Report: Biological or Nuclear WMD Attack Within 5 Years

"The consequences of a biological attack are almost beyond comprehension. It would be 9/11 times 10 or a hundred in terms of the number of people who would be killed," former Sen. Bob Graham said.

He cited the flu virus that killed millions of people in 1918 as an example.

"Today it is still in the laboratory, but if it should get out and into the hands of scientists who knew how to use it for a violent purpose, we could have multiple times the 40 million people who were killed 100 years ago," he said
The U.S. government "needs to move more aggressively to limit" the spread of biological weapons, the commission said in its report.
vairetubesays...

wait, who released this report early? don't they save these things so we can have fun hearings on who dropped the ball? now... we have no excuses

pretty much a given and an easy guess. you don't even WANT to know what else is going to happen! boy howdy.

p.s. it involves many monkeys and crisco. so many monkeys. you've been warned obama!

9453says...

What a load of crap this puff piece is. Next to no evidence presented to support their fear-mongering. What is the Obama administration going to do to prevent attacks by the Flying Spaghetti Monster? He needs to dedicate more funding to the Spaghetti-Industrial Complex, clearly.

GeeSussFreeKsays...

"...Although a number of international treaties have banned the development, production, and stockpiling of chemical weapons, these agents reportedly are still being produced or stockpiled in several countries.

Within the last decade, terrorists deployed chemical weapons against civilian populations for the first time in history. The release of sarin in Matsumoto, Japan, in June 1994 by the extremist Aum Shinrikyo cult left 7 dead and 280 injured. The following year, the Aum Shinrikyo cult released sarin vapor in the Tokyo subway system during morning rush hour, leaving 12 dead and sending more than 5,000 casualties to local hospitals."


The threat is real, the only thing that prevents massive use is the labs and facilities needed to produce it on large scales. The procurement from failing first world nations is a very large and real threat. To just brush the idea under the carpet and say "It will never happen" is naive. Just because something hasn't happened before on a large scale doesn't make it impossible or improbable. The fact remains that terrorist organizations would LOVE to deploy such weapons if they could get their hands on large supplies of them.

While there might be a certain degree of unnecessary fear pandering in this video, that doesn't mean the idea should be completely disregarded, the consequences are just to grave to ignore.

Ryjkyjsays...

^ If you didn't already know it was possible then you've been living under a rock. Seriously. The media comes out with this and people get scared? I've heard people say: "If Obama gets elected the terrorists are going to attack!" It works both ways. Terrorists are going to attack. The surprising thing is that it doesn't happen more often. 40,000 illegal immigrants come over the Mexican border alone each year and people feel safe because of who's in the white house? Really?

You know what my first thought was on the morning of 9/11/01? It was, "jeez, I've been expecting this for so long. I'm surprised it doesn't happen more often."

Even if an event the size of 9/11 were to occur in America EVERY YEAR, more people would still die of peanut alergies.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More