A trio of reckless thieves breaks into the house of a wealthy blind man, thinking they’ll get away with the perfect heist. They’re wrong
newtboysays...

Finally, a decent looking movie that's actually an original story.
Oddly ironic that it comes from the people who made Evil Dead and Evil Dead2, which were almost shot for shot the same movie.

siftbotsays...

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Saturday, August 27th, 2016 11:13am PDT - promote requested by Mordhaus.

newtboysays...

Thanks for the promote.
It looked good, I'm glad to hear it was from someone who's taste seems close to mine in many instances.

Mordhaussaid:

It was pretty good, watched it last night. Some seriously weird shit near the end. *promote

Drachen_Jagersays...

Uhh, that was the point of Evil Dead II.

He (Raimi) did a super-low budget film with his friends and found big cult success, a film studio wanted to capitalize, but thought the production values were too low, so paid them to re-shoot the whole thing.

No lack of creativity to blame there.

newtboysaid:

Finally, a decent looking movie that's actually an original story.
Oddly ironic that it comes from the people who made Evil Dead and Evil Dead2, which were almost shot for shot the same movie.

newtboysays...

I know all this...ED2 is one of my favorite movies. I was not implying a lack of creativity, only the irony of the juxtaposition of 1. A shot for shot remake vs 2. A seemingly original plot. ED was also quite an original, but not 2, as good as it was.

Drachen_Jagersaid:

Uhh, that was the point of Evil Dead II.

He (Raimi) did a super-low budget film with his friends and found big cult success, a film studio wanted to capitalize, but thought the production values were too low, so paid them to re-shoot the whole thing.

No lack of creativity to blame there.

OverLordsays...

I think we can all agree that Army of Darkness was the far superior movie of the three.

newtboysaid:

I know all this...ED2 is one of my favorite movies. I was not implying a lack of creativity, only the irony of the juxtaposition of 1. A shot for shot remake vs 2. A seemingly original plot. ED was also quite an original, but not 2, as good as it was.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More