..also, it looks like you'd need a long-ass straw.

I'm not impressed with this at all. What Coke is doing is subverting a regulation intended to reduce litter (bottle deposits) in a way that produces more litter (plastic bags) while also finding yet another surface to plaster with their logo. And I am supposed to confuse that with environmentalism?

First the Higgs Boson discovery...now this. These are exciting times.

@wormwood they were using bags already, and the hoarse sounding voice in the ad said it's biodegradable. You don't want to cross the guy with that voice.

@wormwood. I don't for one second think that Coca Cola is doing this for environmental reasons, but plastic bottles were never an issue. Coca Cola is, and has been, selling their product in reusable glass bottles. Customers don't want to pay the deposit on the glass bottle (or bother bringing the bottle back), and that's where plastic enters the picture.

It will be a failure unless they are free. If they are free other drinks besides coke will be served in them. They fail to understand the purpose of drinks in bags is to save money.

What wormwood said was right.

>> ^braschlosan:

It will be a failure unless they are free. If they are free other drinks besides coke will be served in them. They fail to understand the purpose of drinks in bags is to save money.
What wormwood said was right.


Pretty safe to assume that they are free to customers. ..maybe the same price, perhaps free, to store owners.
..and perhaps I missed wormword's point. Glass bottles, at least in Central America, have nothing to do with government imposed environmental regulations.

>> ^oohlalasassoon:

First the Higgs Boson discovery...now this. These are exciting times.


I knew that the God Bag was right around the corner after the Higgs.

Stupid... gross... unaesthetic.... way to make a Coke seem like a disgusting junkie fix .

Hope you never have to set your drink down.

Are you denying that the bottles have a deposit on them?
>> ^grinter:

Pretty safe to assume that they are free to customers. ..maybe the same price, perhaps free, to store owners.
..and perhaps I missed wormword's point. Glass bottles, at least in Central America, have nothing to do with government imposed environmental regulations.

>> ^braschlosan:

Are you denying that the bottles have a deposit on them?
>> ^grinter:
Pretty safe to assume that they are free to customers. ..maybe the same price, perhaps free, to store owners.
..and perhaps I missed wormword's point. Glass bottles, at least in Central America, have nothing to do with government imposed environmental regulations.



nope. but I am confused about why you would ask that.