*nochannel
*comedy

Dirty, dirty hippy....gtfo out of Science.

You would think selling one's soul would make for a better song....or a better career.

>> ^BoneRemake:

>> ^rembar:
Huh. The beginning of this song sounds exactly like Vanilla Ice's "Ice Ice Baby". Queen was jacking Vanilla's material???!?!
... ducks

eat your own excrement and die.
vanilla gave his popularity with his soul, to atain that is what you make fun of.

In light of Linda's post, I'm going to *discard this post for now.

I removed this post because while it is science, it's pretty low on quality info. Notably the amygdala is misspelled "amigdala".

Also some major oversimplification going on....and the cortex bit is either too confusing or straight-up wrong.

dupe comment

Choggie, your stats are completely off. I'm guessing you pulled that number off this wiki article, in which case the actual number is 17.6 suicides PER 100,000 PEOPLE, which is actually 0.0176%, not 17.6%.

....not that it matters since you're ranting out your ass anyhow.

Fake.

Not fit for the Science channel....hopefully the full National Geographic piece will be of higher quality.

Vollenweider's work is interesting though: http://www.dcp.uzh.ch/vollenweider/

*science

Goshdarn, I totally forgot about that! Thanks, Gwiz, and thanks for the welcome back. I intend to clean house for sure...

In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
If you view videosift in science.videosift.com and go to an individual video, you still have ye olde "remove from this channel" on your own channel.

I have that on http://talks.videosift.com/video/Yes-Men-hoax-Chamber-of-Commerce-press-conference for instance.

You should have it on the bottom of http://science.videosift.com/video/Balloon-Boy-Definitely-A-HOax for instance.

And welcome back, rembar, I'm looking forward to all the

This video has been removed from all channels (Science) due to invalid channel assignment - nochannel invoked by rembar. Please review the FAQ to learn about appropriate channel assignments.

You've been missed.

Incredible claims require incredible evidence. Some rando yammering away for 10 minutes without any attempt to add credulity to his out-of-left-field claims using any evidence, hell, even other testimony, does not deserve time in the Science channel.

And yes, for the record I am biased due to a severe allergy to bullshit.

*nochannel
*military
*documentaries
*politics
*engineering
*fear
*news

Out.

Strange sexual encounters with odd humanoid females makes not an alien encounter....why, if I were to relate you my activities just this past Saturday....

*nochannel
*books
*downunder
*talks
*controversy

On the topic of swine flu vaccines, Maher doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about. And that's even with some major issues to criticize, especially with pretty significant gaps being jumped in the FDA's clinical trials (relying instead on foreign trials, which are of variable reliability) right now because of the rush to get vaccines to market in preparation for if/before shit can hit the fan.

Maybe he's reasonable in questioning the many biases (social, governmental, corporate, etc.) that can influence the adoption of particular vaccines, but it's easy to handwave and fingerpoint without examining any clinical data, the kind of stuff Maher clearly hasn't even farted in the direction of much less mulled over himself.

Also Frist is delusional if he thinks the US has the best healthcare in the world. Then again, this is the same asshole who gave a completely incorrect, uninformed opinion on Schiavo's PVS based on an hour or two of video footage of her.

*nochannel

Get out.