yup , if they aren't real, howd they snatch someone and get past the cops 15 feet away. look at .22-.25 three cops in view and one guy trying to walk away from em.

i love me some privacy, and these pulls have happened before . Which just makes it all the more amazing that they were dumb enough not to assume CL was a flake factory . Of course the guys who published it are sleaze , as are Some of the respondents ,
sure there are a lot of married people , ministers , councilmen , etc. etc. . But what of those who were just having fun?
"Never say anything you wouldn't mind seeing in print the next day ." Lydon Johnson
Could you imagine if every pickup line you tried was published .

never even knew there was a video for this song , kinda wish i still didn't.
great song ,, baaaaaad video.

I understand your point Wingo , but why is it only senator from the upper midwest seem to actually both remember and defend said document in public , with realpolitk.

Hey , Winstonfield_Pennypacker ,
is all that you do hate?
With 3 votes for videos in 1.5 years?
426 comments , and 3 votes? Isn't there anything that you actually like?
Or are you in fact a modern metaphor for archie bunker .
You don't know science .
You bail out of any argument or debate as soon as it becomes clear your losing .
So you come here to bitch at people who don't believe the same as you .
To what end or effect ?
what change is it you hope to affect ?
This site isn't only about american points of view .
And just in case you hadn't noticed the pendulum went the other way the last time we had a say in it.
I hope you find something that makes you happy , somewhere , cause from reading your stuff , this aint it .

1 last thing , you haven't even heard the american left .
try amy goodman / juan gonzalez and democracy now , you've been getting it easy for a long time from the Centrist Media.
The 1st time you meet the real progressive radical left , your brains gonna go boom.

WP , you still haven't actually refuted the science .
With that all important peer-reviewed proof .
Are you talking above your pay grade?
You also don't seem to be able to refute the end of resources as a base of wealth . or really anything , with success .
if your gonna get on the court you better bring a better game than that.
WaitswithaPimpHand

Ok WP , you still cant provide good links to peer reviewed data huh ?
This is a report ( sorry pdf ) that details paleoclimate carbon ppm measurements ,
and surprise , theorizes those high levels are the case of the high temperatures .
http://earth.geology.yale.edu/~ajs/1991/04.1991.03Cerling.pdf

also
The only thing that is political in this movement is that studied observation MAY lead the way to better governance
The word is MAY , as in might , or possibly .

Have you ever heard the ultimate conspiracy theory?
It goes like this .
I don't believe in any conspiracies , because if i believed in a conspiracy , it would mean i knew something about said conspiracy , and therefore would be a danger to it , and therefore it would be a danger to me , therefore i don't believe in any conspiracies .
Circular logic is what it's called .
So what your saying is ALL the governments in the whole world except the U.S. , as they did not sign the Kyoto Accord , are working together to rip you off .
Paranoia is the easiest form of narcissism.

So lets say they win , and it's false, what do they do with all the tax money ?
How do they keep from getting whacked by a disgruntled polity?

Ok lets say they lose , and it's real .
We lose 1/3 of the worlds population , weighted more heavily among the poor , and populations near any coastline . Wasn't it well over 50% of the world population that lives within 50 miles of the coast ? We gain 40 feet , 12.19 meters , of sea level . Hence the title of this video .

Option 3 is obviously , They win and it's real .
Well they may be able to slow it down before it goes into a self-sustaining loop .
All that methane hydrate stored at the bottom of glaciers doesn't come bubbling lose . All that carbon sequestered in the permafrost stays put. Which it isn't .
http://www.321energy.com/editorials/lamontagne/lamontagne080109.html
Maybe governments have a few extra resources to deal with all the problems that will be caused by it . They still wont have enough because even their reports have been watered down .

Option 4 , They lose , and it's false .
I have a hard time addressing this one , as the odds of the latter are so low, though the odds of the former are well , a real possibility .

to videosift in general, i'm done being nice about this , i'm gonna get out a big pimp hand for any of this bullshit i see.
i spent the last 10 years working in a high carbon contributing indutry , while i knew it was most likely wrong .
so i have a big fucking chip on my shoulder and too much time on my hands .
To those who expect to raise questions , good we need questions , you better bring proof though .
Try again , Try Harder

winston , no there has not been a period since we have been able to measure it , or in ANY historical sample that has carbon ppm as high as it is now . That's in 400,000 years. The only thing that is political in this movement is that studied observation may lead the way to better governance ,with much fewer fatalities , that the current system . What is amazing is that so many defend the ole system , it's the serfs defending the royals, to prey on your old analogy . The old idea of resource based wealth , which leads to power , is just fucking doomed . It's not an if , it's a when . Hopefully enough people will see this and act before it becomes too late for ANY correction that doesnt involve half the fucking human race dying.
Also what a wonderful way to respond , with no sources, no proof, while demanding scientific credulity, yea,, your a clear logical thinker .

I seem to have a problem with the people making denials on these comments , they keep blaming corporate interests for promoting global warming . Over ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_denial ) and over (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/feb/27/climate-change-deniers-sceptics ) it has been shown the denial is funded by giant moneyed multinationals with huge conflicts of interest . If your not into reason that's fine, just don't claim that you are without expecting rebuttal .
Also , unless your getting paid for it why not go somewhere that your point of view would be appreciated, actual debate is always welcome, but your not debating , your just yelling.

can somebody get the vikings rounded up here ,, commenter above needs a can for all that *spam

*discard

*dead

*kill

*kill