Disregarding that the takedowns of those videos might be an overreaction, the person making this video comes off as almost absurdly overly sensitive about having his stuff taken down.

He sold the safe, it's not his money anymore. If he wanted the contents, he should've let a welder open it himself. Of course he could HOPE for the good graces of the buyer, but it's not for him to expect.

If you really want to add stuff like "win" to your video, why not just add it as a tag instead of a channel? Or am I missing something here?

No but spirituality and superstitions aren't by themselves religion, or we would all each belong to hundreds of different religions. That someone tries to talk to ghosts or whatever they do doesn't naturally follow that they're religious or they deal in religious matters. The mere idea that our near and dear live on in some other form after they pass on in their current one is something which, I would imagine, predates religion as an institution by several millenia.

Next on The Chaser's War On Everything, the loaded shotgun experiment. Chris Taylor walks into stores with a loaded shotgun in his hands. See what happens...

Or, you could not put it in the religion channel because it's not religion.

>> ^Yogi:

Whoa lets hold our horses...as far as I can see TV hasn't bettered our nation in any way shape or form. Also educating our public doesn't seem to be working...it just seems to be disenfranchising the smart so they don't vote anymore.


How do you reckon it's education which disenfranchises "the smart" so they don't vote? I would think that a corrupt two-party system with equally unattractive alternatives would be a bigger factor, for instance. Also, surely you can see SOME benefits of television compared to the fifties when it first started to become commonplace, if you stop and think about it for a second.

The common thread here is more information, knowledge and context, with perhaps focus being on the information part. If disenfranchisement is the result of getting better informed, then maybe it's time to do something about the object of that information? Perhaps making people part of the process and maybe even feel like their vote matters, as well as having something or someone worth voting on.

So, it's rude towards sore losers

Is that considered rude? I thought the point of the game was to win?

Very interesting stuff!

To me it looks like an obvious marketing campaign for the republican party to gain black voters by playing on issues that they perceive as important to that demographic. I'm not talking about the movie, I haven't seen it, but rather the interviews and news segment-like ad in this clip.

The story speaks for itself. We don't need pop psychology indulgences from the intellectually barren talking head panel.

Oh, awesome! There's even more to watch then!

That was the coolest thing I've seen in a long time!

The way this video automatically goes on to the subsequent parts of the video makes it kind of unnecessary to vote on parts 2-4, as hardly anyone would start viewing them without first having seen the first.