Come on guys, he is a grey haired nutty professor presenting something that is most likely shown in schools, along with it being pretty common for scientists to not be the most fluid of communicators, and you are surprised he doesn't talk with the confidence of dan savage about sex?

Really?

Criticise the man on his chemistry, rather than his skill as a sex advice consultant.

I don't think the honourific of bamf does this guy justice.

I can kinda see where Westy comes from.
It seems to suggest that men believe that men and should be equal and are equals. However, I think that most intelligent men know that when it comes down to raw stats, yes the odds are stacked against women in many areas.

However, if a women came up to me and asked, "are we equals?" The question posed is a trap, if I say no, it appears that I believe that men are inherently better than women, and deserve a place as second class citizens, so this answer is clearly undesirable, but if I say yes, I'm more than well aware that for every dollar and man earns, a women earns 79 cents. There is dissonance between what I believe should be and what the current situation is.

So my response would hardly be concise to a question which implies a one word answer.

>> ^malakai:

I wonder if this was being taken on the girl's Gap Yah.


She too old to be on her gap yah

See, I tried to come at it with an air of a snooty bitch, but now I just feel like a bit of a dick.
And no, I will not do you laundry.

>> ^gwiz665:

It's what the internet is for! Now do my laundry.

>> ^Kerotan:
>> ^gwiz665:
Who?
>> ^Kerotan:
At least credit credit cassette boy.


The creator; he is hardly an internet sensation, but this isn't the first one he has created either.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yxi6QDwQyLU&feature=mfu_in_o
rder&list=UL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QAvkFS_cgk&feature=mfu_in_o
rder&list=UL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKeoOnSvXn4&feature=mfu_in_o
rder&list=UL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhEQLdCrmiw&feature=mfu_in_o
rder&list=UL
These combined only have a few million views on youtube.
No need to thank me for doing your research.

>> ^gwiz665:

Who?
>> ^Kerotan:
At least credit credit cassette boy.



The creator; he is hardly an internet sensation, but this isn't the first one he has created either.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yxi6QDwQyLU&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QAvkFS_cgk&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKeoOnSvXn4&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhEQLdCrmiw&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

These combined only have a few million views on youtube.
No need to thank me for doing your research.

At least credit credit cassette boy.

Needs *videogame so bad.

>> ^jmd:

Starcraft is and still is a 2 sided player base. You can enjoy the game and beat it if you learn the basics and understand the objectives of each single player map.
However when it comes to multiplayer, there are those who try and play it single player in which you simply work with the structures and units you know and like, and attempt to fight what ever the enemy may throw at you. If possible you produce counter units to a specific unit you just got your first army wiped out with.
Then you got the person who actually understands and learns how to PvP in starcraft. This person knows almost all the units and isn't afraid to use them. He does not build what he likes.. he uses his first spawn minions to both harass the other player (resources are everything. If your collectors are dead or not collecting, you are losing) and see exactly what he is building. He then designs his army around countering it and destroying it. Alot of starcraft falls into the paper rock scissors syndrome.
It becomes a lop sided battle. Even a semi pro noob will totally trounce the average player if he sees and understands what he is building. That is what happened here.


This is frustrating to me, since you kinda have the right idea, but at the same time kinda not.
yes there are times when starcraft will be rock paper scissors, for example if your blindly make alot of shit that can only shoot ground and he makes something that flies and shoots downwards, generally however this is rare at the professional level, since perhaps a strategies biggest weakness is inflexibility.
In this case, it doesn't seem like rock paper scissors at all, just that torch has better mechanics than each player, and to a great extent its not about hand speed either, its a game of memory keepy uppys, (the game when you keep the ball in the air with only without using your hands, I don't know how else to call it) you need to remember to keep building constantly, and it only gets harder as the game progresses.

Quite frankly torch could have beaten these guys with any combination of units.

Also a word on Trevor, I love him purely because when he qualified for GSL, the community at large went "who is his guy?"

Turns out he turned up to world cyber games USA, picked up a mobile game on the day, won WCG USA, got a free trip to Beijing, and finished 3rd in the world at said mobile game, and now he plays SC2.

Downvote for the music alone, a good point shouldn't need intense drumming to back it up.

>> ^EDD:

dead


*notdead

Thumbs up purely for the lady on the left signing the speech.

big thanks for the quality, there is another of these vids here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7jxAyd4-M0&feature=channel with cooller doing the talking about his win in the same set.

I'm really glad people appreciate this video.
In reply to this comment by marinara:
>> ^syncron:

Why hold a tournament of such an old game which nobody really cares about?


*quality
hell didn't play quake 3 for long, loved UT so much. (for the maps and CTF)

apparently this was recorded in july 2010. that's 10 years of quake. Nice to get inside the head of a competitive player.

"Lola, a four-year-old tabby, was discovered 15 hours later by owner Darryl Mann after he heard her cries."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-11068063

Its like the dog has sigur ros stuck in its belly.