>> ^mxxcon:

like i asked in that supposed dupe above, who's that chick on the left? i wasn't looking at anybody else but her. she's hot...


+ 1.

thanks; i have bad knees, and this looks like a possible solution to that ailment.

upvote for showing off 3 languages.

>> ^Yogi:

Wow...calling for firing people when people are struggling to find jobs and afford homes. Stay Classy Videosift.


uh...what? what on earth does the economy have to do with two morons who can't operate their vehicles properly, to the tune of multiple thousands of dollars of damage to an innocent bystander's property?

please rationalize those two people not being disciplined or fired over this.

this video needs more JUMP.

oh, Side-SHOW Bob.

this parody doesn't hold much water due to the fact that this is based on a true story; and the movie was truer to the facts in this case than most other "based on a true story"'s. so, meh.

>> ^mxxcon:

that girl on the left is hot


yes yes yes. WHO is she?

see what i did there.

he should have presented the villians in the reverse order, for a more shocking buildup.

>> ^Sarzy:

It's his first film since the frightening extent of his craziness was revealed via those leaked voicemails. Not a lot of space up there -- post-crazy seemed to sum it up.


so your contention is that he wasn't crazy before the leaked voicemails? that makes as little sense as the implication of the title, that he is no longer crazy.

upvote for keith richards/mikes hard lemonade...

that was one of the most uncomfortable things i've ever watched.

we need a name that's witty at first, but that seems less funny each time you hear it.

*beg

or a 2:19 loop of one particular dunk =)>> ^handmethekeysyou:

As a Knicks fan in the 90s, I expected this video to be a John Starks retrospective.