during war with iran "what can i say, i screwed up.."

Whislt seeing it rise and how much force is needed i can't help but think there must be an easier way.

(an elevator!)

the music is perfect for it

'If I proved that determinism is true, would you choose to believe in it?'

if my brain's processes determined me to do so.


i would vote down just because i disagree with the guy but my brain's chosen not to due to it's physical make up.

quite an interesting thought process brought up at the end. criticizing someone's hobby and belief that it's fun, compare that to criticizing someone's religion.

she said fuks news

he copied the quote in speech marks...

>> ^MINK:
pretty much all the philosophers i have seen are just publicly rationalising their own faults. the selfish ones say we are fundamentally selfish, the hedonistic ones say we are fundamentally hedonistic, the miserable ones say the world is all shit, the scared ones say the world is an illusion etc etc.


I notice people often do this too, seems obvious why -but they don't seem to realise they're doing it. Same goes for a lot of what people say.
I was wondering what her idea of an ideal world would be, there's no point criticizing unless you can explain what would make things better and why.

I took a few with a cheapo camera :
http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v135/73/7/593485720/n593485720_1483145_7173.jpg

Because they're believed for retarded reasons.

i don't have that control bar problem, works just fine: either clicking a place of repositioning slider. maybe get a better up-to-date browser?

>> ^schmawy



Totally wrong. The argument is that he never said that they should be 'prosecuted' for it.

Great until just before the end, the concept of 'reality tunnels' is a bit too new age-y.
Someone's perception doesn't change what's actually in this universe in front of them (don't forget the other physics).

so deep dude.. it's like ULTRA deep..

quite a few inaccuracies here but at least they're talking about it.

>> ^MINK:

"evolution is the explanation for our existence"
HOW? explain to me how evolution is the explanation for our existence you pompous twat. I watched loads of your videos and all you can prove is that we evolved. From WHAT motherfucker?


apes. or much earlier : a bacteria-like lifeform.
before that?
nucleic acids.
before that?
molecules, many of which that came about from the death of massive stars.
before that?
the big bang.
what caused that?
probabilities.
dawkin's doesn't need to use anthropic/philosophical reasoning though, he uses scientific FACTS for his arguments. which is why everyone fails if they disagree with him - because he's right.

doesn't he mean transit not eclipse. perhaps i'm not clear on the definitions