Greatest chick I was ever with was quiet as a church mouse and only made sounds when they were forced out of her. Chicks who are loud annoy the hell out of me.

>> ^Enzoblue:

Greatest chick I was ever with was quiet as a church mouse and only made sounds when they were forced out of her. Chicks who are loud annoy the hell out of me.


How did you fit your penis in a church mouse ?

>> ^westy:

>> ^Enzoblue:
Greatest chick I was ever with was quiet as a church mouse and only made sounds when they were forced out of her. Chicks who are loud annoy the hell out of me.

How did you fit your penis in a church mouse ?


Who said I did? I said I forced sounds out of her.

sex is more a communication,an expression of emotional connectedness translated into a physical manifestation and not just a mundane act of procreation.

in my humble opinion women are far more adept in the art of physical communication than men are.the language they employ to express their adoration is as varied as it is profoundly subtle.
seduction is an art spoken in whispers and all we have to do is but listen.
a woman will use everything at her disposal:
the lingering stare.
the coy smile.
the flirtatious hair twirl.
let there be no mistake...
a woman plans EVERYTHING,down to the smallest detail,especially when it comes to seduction.
they have an arsenal of weapons of mass seduction and to the discerning male who understands this language there is little room for doubt the intentions and desires being broadcast on all channels.

but sadly most males are not of the discerning sort (this is due to many factors,some social,others more internally based).
so the woman is almost forced to become a blunt instrument and bash the male in the face to communicate her intentions.
so it really should not come as a surprise that some woman have been found to use the more blunt and crude instruments in their arsenal in order to get their message across.

so we have women faking orgasms and pretend moaning but even in its falseness there is still the act of love,or loving,to be more accurate,because ultimately the women is still attempting to be a good lover by making her man feel...well..like a MAN.

so let me present a little unbidden advice:
to all my male brothers.
start paying attention!
because if you start paying attention to all those seemingly innocuous cues that your woman drops on a daily basis.those fake moans and fake orgasms will no longer be...well..fake.

that being said.
i am with cenk that if you dont bring the genuine read deal i become bored real fast.
i am not interested in performance art.
i am interested in you.
let your body talk to me.
i will listen.

It's universal: in every culture, the woman makes more noise than the man does. It's a direct contradiction to the standard narrative that women trade sexual fidelity for the material support and protection from a particular man. Just think: If sex is universally shameful, and women are less libidinous, then why are they so likely to loudly announce their sexual pleasure?

It doesn't fit into what we "know," according to the central "myth" of the nature of human sexuality being one of monogamous pair-bonding. However, it does fit into the paradigm put forth in the book, Sex at Dawn, which looks at primate sexual behaviors and found that where the females make the most noise is where the females are the most promiscuous: because this attracts other males.

Interesting.

The hottest church mouse I was with screamed like a banshee! Most unexpected.

If I was more of a fuckwit, I would share this information with my flatmate who, one drunken evening, brought home a woman who screamed SO LOUDLY that it was a fucking theatrical performance. I mean, it was so unbelievably fake that I actually felt incredible pity for the poor woman. (I have since learned that she has some Serious Issues.)

But what's possibly sadder still is my flatmate's total ignorance of her malingering, and his conviction that it was the best sex he's ever had, and that it showed his sexual prowess was unprecedented.

It actually makes me feel sick thinking about it.

Clearly the 'validation' function works. To my great horror.

I always assumed it was because I paid them.

Here's the study http://www.springerlink.com/content/w6t8284q7123w214/

You can read it yourself for the low price of $35

You can read it yourself for the low price of $0! Thanks, university library subscription!

>> ^entr0py:

Here's the study http://www.springerlink.com/content/w6t8284q7123w214/
You can read it yourself for the low price of $35