So what is terrible here, is that a politician wants empirical evidence readily understandable from a common point of view by a lot of people before rushing to sacrifice our civilians in a war that is now common knowledge to be an atrocity commited by your shitty, shitty cunt-ry? You're Terrible. Where is the PROOF?

My agreement is agreeable to agree.

Chrétien likes to keep it real.

I look at him like many Americans look at Clinton - imperfect, ballsy, powerful, and with good intentions. I do remember that he was the author of the 'White Paper' as Trudeau's INAC Minister, but I also remember he balanced the budget, and said no to the Americans over Iraq under intense domestic and international pressure. The little guy from Shawinigan certainly looks good compared to the buffoon in the PMO now.

Master tautologist is master tautologist.

I think what he's saying, to put it in Rumsfeldese, is that a proof is a "known known".

The cake is a lie.

Reminds me of Dubya's "sovereign" moment.

A proof is something proven, what else do you need?

I love Chretien, he was da man. Now we have that fat fecking weasel that only neocon American wannabes have any time for, aka Stephen "Dubya II" Harper. Chretien was funny when he got pissed off at someone for asking stupid questions, not terribly eloquent, but he always seemed to be on the edge of grabbing them by the collar and shouting into their face, "stop asking me these stupid fucking question, twat!", mais en francais, of course, mon tarbarnac.