That's a whole lot of stupid. I guess that makes me a deluded dissenter, since the author had the courtesy to tell us that there is nothing wrong with this argument.

*facepalm*

I think this guy doesn't believe in holes...

This just doesn't make any sense. If objects that have been built exist then we were created and did not evolve? How so? The existence of created objects disprove evolution? Nothing in this video makes any sense.

yeah, man!

What's up with these "intelligent design" enthusiasts not comprehending the difference between inanimate objects and living organisms?

Houses don't have sex! [ironic since theists tend to harp on that topic a lot]

Can we make a videosift television station please?
And make one of the channels a 24/7 informative series on evolution?

Regular updates on new findings and maybe some call-a-thons like PBS! =P

herpa derp

Here's a direct quote from the moron who posted this on YouTube:

How to be an intellectually fulfilled Atheist! (In 5 EASY steps!)

What this video is saying:
First, what this video is NOT saying. Many Atheists have (for some reaon......perhaps creating a strawman), claimed that my analogy fails, because I can't compare houses to living things, since they don't reproduce. Apparently, they think I didn't think of that (LOL). Yet, the fact that houses DON'T reproduce is exactly why I used houses. Let me explain. (In case the video went over your head, as it seems to have for many people )

I used arguements which are commonly used to support biological evolution, and showed that those same arguements can be used to support "house" evolution. Now, what does that tell us about those arguements? It means that those arguements DON'T ACTUALLY prove evolution at all (since they can be applied to houses, which we KNOW didnt evolve).

For example, take my first arguement in this video (then maybe you can figure out the rest).

Arguement #1: Bad Design.
I've actually heard Atheists claim that since some things are supposedly not designed optimally (backwards wired eye), then it wasn't design. Yet, this is a ridiculus arguement, as this video demonstrated. Just because a light switch doesn't work, would we conclude that therefore no one designed it??? Of course not! THAT is the point I am making in this video.

For the record, the imperfectness of the design is a philosophical/theological question. I believe that we live in a fallen world. That is one explanation (and I think the best one). But, scientifically speaking, you would have to be crazy to think that since something doesn't work, then therefore it wasn't designed.

Get it? Im not saying that "houses can't evolve, therefore living things didnt evolve". And I KNOW that houses didn't evolve!

Wow, did I really just have to explain all that???

sir your grasp of science is about as impressive as your grasp of flash animation.

*parody

Adding video to channels (Parody) - requested by Trancecoach.

I am assuming this a joke. The board evolves into a new board when it bends. Holy Shit this video is so bad it's making me wish I was religious. Haha